Hearted Youtube comments on The Aesthetic City (@the_aesthetic_city) channel.
-
10
-
I'm a history PhD candidate and It's startling how similar my experience in graduate school has been. Just replace "modern" with "postmodern," and practically everything mentioned in the video is the same. A bland European monoculture that raises an autoimmune response against other ideas. It's the same in literature, languages, art history, and religious studies.
In my first few years I tried to bring in alternative viewpoints, but I got smacked down and even accused of having right-wing sympathies (I don't). Eventually I got discouraged and just wanted to graduate, so I started putting gibberish from Lacan, Butler, et al in my (otherwise good) papers and pretended to understand gibberish while other people were speaking it, and the result was that I became well-liked in my department and got money and pats on the head.
Teaching is the only part of the job that feels honest and worthwhile, but we are strongly advised to spend as little time on our classes as possible and direct our energy into publishing, conferences, and grant writing. If I wanted to, I could halve the time I spend on my classes and experience no negative repercussions whatsoever, but seeing the students get excited about history is the only thing that keeps me going.
So, yeah, long story short, it's infested all the humanities I know of. (Is architecture a humanity? I think this channel would say yes.)
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
I'm very excited about the way that the discussion around architecture has been shifting recently!
I remember even a few years ago being annoyed that most of the people publicly supporting traditional architecture were also regressive conservatives (notably trump). It seemed to me that people were unable to separate the notion that "old buildings were more beautiful" from "the past was better than today". The way I saw it, modernity just had a PR problem. Modern medicine, democracy, and social welfare made the average person's life orders of magnitude better and more luxurious than even 100 years ago, and yet we chose to keep building ugly, oppressive buildings and dangerous car-centric cities. It was silly. The people of the past didn't really deserve the beautiful cities they lived in, as they were built on the backs of slavery and conquest. Yet today, when we are much more ethical (though by no means completely, there's a lot of work left to do), we couldn't replicate the beauty of the past?
I couldn't help but wonder if our ugly cities contributed to people's delusion that the past was better. How could cities so well-designed and beautiful be home to such oppressive, disgusting regimes? How could slavers live in grandeur whilst we lived in squalor? I can imagine some people coming to the conclusion that modernity must not be as good as it seems. Without beauty, we fail to see our progress.
It's only been a few years, and yet now the situation is completely different. We have a growing urbanist movement online and in real life. More importantly, it is a movement rooted in egalitarian ideals - we won't replicate the disgusting societies of the past, but instead work towards ones where everybody can live in peace and happiness. One where the beauty is deserved. I couldn't be happier! Keep on fighting the good fight, and day by day we will make the world a better place!
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7