Hearted Youtube comments on Ziroth (@ZirothTech) channel.
-
7800
-
2700
-
1800
-
1700
-
1100
-
Recently, I had an enlightening experience while using a small electric motor on my boat. I want to share this because it illustrates the significant impact that underwater noises, like those from propellers, can have on marine life.
While I was out on the water, something remarkable happened. I switched the motor into reverse, and to my surprise, a seal popped its head up out of the water. Intrigued, I stopped the motor, and the seal submerged. But when I hit reverse again, the seal resurfaced. This wasn't a one-time occurrence. Each time I alternated between forward and reverse, even from a distance, the seal would respond by appearing while the engine was in reverse.
This was particularly striking because the motor I was using was very small and relatively quiet โ an electric model. Yet, the seal's reaction was immediate and consistent. This interaction, as amazing as it was to witness, really drove home a crucial point for me.
It made me realize the profound effect that underwater noise โ from things like propellers and even sonar โ can have on aquatic creatures. The fact that even a small, 'silent' motor could elicit such a clear response from the seal underscores the sensitivity of marine life to our human-made sounds in their environment. It's an important consideration for all of us who spend time on the water and a reminder of the broader environmental impact of our activities.
895
-
793
-
792
-
774
-
762
-
711
-
667
-
655
-
608
-
580
-
576
-
547
-
512
-
510
-
488
-
472
-
462
-
450
-
393
-
as someone who has spent most of the last 18 years on oil rigs, as a geologist, and later an engineer, I can say that the process to drill deep geothermal wells is not really any different to conventional oil and gas drilling. We have the technology to drill very deeply already, we don't need this new plasma method that will use an incredible amount of electricity. Just because some technology exists, doesnt mean it's going to be affordable, or applicable.
Geodynamics, a company in Australia already built a proof of concept for enhanced geothermal, or hot dry rock geothermal (look for Geodynamics Habanero project). They drilled multiple wells to only 4-5km deep, and circulated water between wells, generating steam, and electricity. One major economic hurdle was affordable corrosion control, not the technology to drill the wells.
Conceptually, it's awesome, no need to burn fossil fuels, etc, but the reality is that there is no point building an amazing system if you cannot maintain the equipment and sell the end product at an affordable price.
390
-
389
-
This is the first I have heard of Rondo Energy, so thank you for the introduction. However, I would like to hear more technical details about their heat storage battery.
Pros: 1) off the shelf technologies 2) simple, long life materials 3) high output temperatures (compared to other heat storage technologies). I love this part of the solution.
Cons:
1) I am very skeptical of the stated 98% storage efficiency mentioned at the start of the video. Usually, when talking about storage technology, people quote the "round trip efficiency", meaning, what percent of the input energy comes out durring discharge as usable energy. However, I suspect you are quoting the charging efficiency, meaning how much of the input energy is stored in the battery, ignoring how much energy is lost durring the extraction process.
If you really do mean "round trip efficiency", then this statistic is so outlandish, it really is "too good to be true", and begs for justification and a heavy dose of skepticism. This would be astounding, and much higher than any of the other heat storage technologies. Lithium ion itself is typically stated to have 90% round trip storage effeciency, which is higher than any other heat energy storage technology that I am aware of.
2) There is no explanation of how the heat (ie, hot air?) used after it leaves the battery. I can imagine a few uses, but some solid real world examples would have been nice.
3) There is no talk about the ideal storage charge/discharge cycle time. Is this technology better suited to be used for short term (4 hour) medium term (8 to 12 hour) or long term (days/weeks) storage?
387
-
366
-
351
-
343
-
330
-
314
-
309
-
304
-
281
-
278
-
254
-
254
-
246
-
219
-
201
-
199
-
194
-
194
-
192
-
181
-
181
-
162
-
160
-
154