Hearted Youtube comments on Spectacles (@spectacles-dm) channel.
-
9700
-
6300
-
4900
-
4600
-
3100
-
2500
-
2300
-
2200
-
2100
-
2000
-
1500
-
1400
-
1300
-
1200
-
1200
-
1100
-
1000
-
994
-
927
-
771
-
748
-
717
-
715
-
678
-
658
-
636
-
630
-
609
-
582
-
Hi, I'm Matthew Lenoe's son. My sister and I have let him know about the video and, while he hasn't watched it, he's happy that his research is being shared to a wider audience. He remains convicted that Nikolaev acted alone and expressed disappointment to me in the past that his work on the murder would do little to sway public opinion, because it was meant for a scholarly audience. Now, over 100,000 people have seen this video!
I'm also thankful that you did your homework and read his absolute tome of a book (over 600 pages!) to summarize it to an audience on Youtube. Seeing my dad's work in this format was really exciting, and now I have something to show my friends what he actually does. If you are willing to deal with the length, I would highly recommend picking up a copy of the book if you have any interest in forensics since there is a really interesting section on analysis of Borisov's skull, for example.
Finally, I think your conclusion to the video is exactly right: it's pretty clear that we often accept conspiracy theories to justify our own views of the world and of politics. Kirov's murder has come to my mind a lot in the past two weeks or so, for obvious reasons. Often, what political assassinations do is reveal a part of a society or ideology that is deeply flawed or difficult to confront. A conspiracy theory allows the public not to meet those flaws head on by providing simple explanations. I think what my father's and your work shows is that truth still matters in public discourse, no matter what others may say.
569
-
554
-
545
-
522
-
485
-
419
-
387
-
385
-
I lived in Hungary at the time and Hungarian is my second native language.
There is a shocking lack of balanced talk about how and why this is happening. And enough Hungarians understand enough English to feel that they are being attacked by "western media", which often makes things worse., I have to say, which is upsetting.
I was expecting similar here, but this video was just great.
I would have maybe added that the opposition party really messed up not only with that speech, but also the heavy handed way they cracked down on protesters...though there might have been agents setting off the fights and violence. Either way, it just added even more oil to the bonfire.
It was legit scary....and now....
I would also add that there is also, sadly, a long history where people feel left in the cold in Eastern Europe, definitely in Hungary, and thinking they will never be accepted in the west nor ever be anything but on their own...so that adds to such power hungry people's ability to manipulate the public.
It's a complicated situation, but this was the first well-made video I've seen explaining the gist of it to someone who might not really understand what's going on.
Great video, mate.
Thanks.
Edit: a link about the "M (agyar) TV Siege"
https://index.hu/belfold/ost060919/
375
-
372
-
324
-
320
-
This video was quite disappointing for me because it was such a good video idea to focus in on this election and tell its story, but I think you dropped the ball.
• First I would have dropped as much explanation of other parts of the conflict as possible: just focus purely on the election.
• You went really easy on Fatah here. Fatah was very corrupt in those days and they are even more hated now. I was kind of shocked to see they got 41% in the election. Fatah really were a long shot to win the whole time.
• Hamas was originally a social services org, a sort of replacement for incompetent govt. They have always been out there helping people that the corrupt Fatah left behind. Criminal gangs often do the same thing, because it really does make you more popular. You can take all the credit for good deeds done and little of the blame for bad stuff the govt fails to do.
• Of course the US are idiots when it comes to knowing other nation's opinions, but the Europeans also duped themselves. You should have mentioned that.
• The elections were free and fair with international observers. You assumed the viewer would understand this but you should have said it.
• Everyone reneged on the elections once Hamas won. The US, the EU, Fatah. That's not how elections work bro. This is the most important thing: there was no longer any mechanism to rein Hamas in!
• Fatah cancelled all future elections: forever. They are a dictatorship in the West Bank now and the Palestinian people only allow them to exist because foreign countries pay the PLO worker's salaries, money that the West Bank can't afford to turn away.
• Hamas followed suit and also cancelled all future elections in Gaza. I mean, why have elections if your opposition will simply cancel any future elections if they win...
Yes you got a lot of this info into your video, but only in disjointed fragments of its 13 min length. This is an extremely charged topic, only focus on the facts (I may have got some of the above wrong, but I'm not producing something so I'm not going to double check), lay out a clear sequence of events, then leave it to the audience.
I don't write comments like this often: only when I think people are close, but not quite achieving, greatness.
318
-
316
-
291
-
287
-
279
-
268
-
267
-
251
-
249