Hearted Youtube comments on Spectacles (@spectacles-dm) channel.

  1. 9700
  2. 6300
  3. 4900
  4. 4600
  5. 3100
  6. 2500
  7. 2300
  8. 2200
  9. 2100
  10. 2000
  11. 1500
  12. 1400
  13. 1300
  14. 1200
  15. 1200
  16. 1100
  17. 1000
  18. 994
  19. 927
  20. 771
  21. 748
  22. 717
  23. 715
  24. 678
  25. 658
  26. 636
  27. 630
  28. 609
  29. 582
  30. Hi, I'm Matthew Lenoe's son. My sister and I have let him know about the video and, while he hasn't watched it, he's happy that his research is being shared to a wider audience. He remains convicted that Nikolaev acted alone and expressed disappointment to me in the past that his work on the murder would do little to sway public opinion, because it was meant for a scholarly audience. Now, over 100,000 people have seen this video! I'm also thankful that you did your homework and read his absolute tome of a book (over 600 pages!) to summarize it to an audience on Youtube. Seeing my dad's work in this format was really exciting, and now I have something to show my friends what he actually does. If you are willing to deal with the length, I would highly recommend picking up a copy of the book if you have any interest in forensics since there is a really interesting section on analysis of Borisov's skull, for example. Finally, I think your conclusion to the video is exactly right: it's pretty clear that we often accept conspiracy theories to justify our own views of the world and of politics. Kirov's murder has come to my mind a lot in the past two weeks or so, for obvious reasons. Often, what political assassinations do is reveal a part of a society or ideology that is deeply flawed or difficult to confront. A conspiracy theory allows the public not to meet those flaws head on by providing simple explanations. I think what my father's and your work shows is that truth still matters in public discourse, no matter what others may say.
    569
  31. 554
  32. 545
  33. 522
  34. 485
  35. 419
  36. 387
  37. 385
  38. 375
  39. 372
  40. 324
  41. 320
  42. This video was quite disappointing for me because it was such a good video idea to focus in on this election and tell its story, but I think you dropped the ball. • First I would have dropped as much explanation of other parts of the conflict as possible: just focus purely on the election. • You went really easy on Fatah here. Fatah was very corrupt in those days and they are even more hated now. I was kind of shocked to see they got 41% in the election. Fatah really were a long shot to win the whole time. • Hamas was originally a social services org, a sort of replacement for incompetent govt. They have always been out there helping people that the corrupt Fatah left behind. Criminal gangs often do the same thing, because it really does make you more popular. You can take all the credit for good deeds done and little of the blame for bad stuff the govt fails to do. • Of course the US are idiots when it comes to knowing other nation's opinions, but the Europeans also duped themselves. You should have mentioned that. • The elections were free and fair with international observers. You assumed the viewer would understand this but you should have said it. • Everyone reneged on the elections once Hamas won. The US, the EU, Fatah. That's not how elections work bro. This is the most important thing: there was no longer any mechanism to rein Hamas in! • Fatah cancelled all future elections: forever. They are a dictatorship in the West Bank now and the Palestinian people only allow them to exist because foreign countries pay the PLO worker's salaries, money that the West Bank can't afford to turn away. • Hamas followed suit and also cancelled all future elections in Gaza. I mean, why have elections if your opposition will simply cancel any future elections if they win... Yes you got a lot of this info into your video, but only in disjointed fragments of its 13 min length. This is an extremely charged topic, only focus on the facts (I may have got some of the above wrong, but I'm not producing something so I'm not going to double check), lay out a clear sequence of events, then leave it to the audience. I don't write comments like this often: only when I think people are close, but not quite achieving, greatness.
    318
  43. 316
  44. Great video on how Japanese politics got to how it is today. Boring, technocratic, and probably the true embodiment of what an End of History truly looks likes. My grandma was a university student during the Anpo protests as a right-winger, but many of her friends dropped out of university and devoted themselves to left-wing politics. One of them got pregnant and then become disillusioned with politics altogether. My grandfather who was quite conservative until his death did vote against the LDP once out of complete disgust for them, he would only do this again in the 90s. Also, at the time it seemed like the socialist parties were the party of small businesses as he was a factory owner while the LDP was the party conglomerates. And in the late 60s and 70s, there was a wave of left-wing student protests which were incredibly violent. My mother's tutor from UTokyo got sent to prison for throwing a molotov at a police officer. Also during this time one of the most notorious terrorist groups in the world came from Japan. And the political infighting within the Japanese left was so bad that I think it was not until the early 2000s when there wasn't at least one person who was injured or killed from sectarianism. And I am sure a lot of people here visited Narita airport which probably represents some of the best things about Japan, but it was the battleground of a years long battle between an unusual alliance of farmers who did not want to give up their land and leftists against Japanese riot police and construction workers which got incredibly violent. There is quiet a few footage you can find of the "Sanrizuka" movement on YouTube that shows just how crazy things got. But if anyone is interested in literature from the 1960s, check out the short stories "Seventeen" and "Death of Political Youth" by Oe Kenzaburo. It is based off of the guy who murdered Inejiro Asanuma. Some of the most intense literature I have ever read.
    291
  45. 287
  46. 279
  47. 268
  48. 267
  49. 251
  50. 249