Hearted Youtube comments on Munro Live (@MunroLive) channel.

  1. 8500
  2. 7100
  3. 1800
  4. 1700
  5. 1600
  6. 1500
  7. 1400
  8. 1000
  9. 1000
  10. 1000
  11. 985
  12. 945
  13. 899
  14. 894
  15. 884
  16. 876
  17. 823
  18. 795
  19. 793
  20. 779
  21. 770
  22. 769
  23. 760
  24. 753
  25. 739
  26. 725
  27. 716
  28. 709
  29. 705
  30. 701
  31. 691
  32. 672
  33. 642
  34. 626
  35. Thanks Sandy for this motor teardown. I can comment on the winding technology wound vs hairpin. I work with engineers to help them simulate and design these different types of windings and they both come with pros and cons. Wound windings are well known and more flexible in their design, you can make them fill a slot of any shape with a rather good fill factor. The insulation between each separate wire makes that fill factor impossible to reach 80% for instance. Designers usually can go up to 50-60% of copper in the slot. In terms of layout it is also easier to do any sort of connection as you can bend and reposition wires "easily". The cooling of these wires is not very easy as it comes as a large bundle of wire with resin/impregnation around them. Hairpin windings are a recent trend as they provide some benefits. The fill factor can be a bit higher but the slot has to be rectangular. Also as you mentioned Sandy, with higher speeds, you have higher frequency currents and then you can start to have eddy currents and proximity effects going on. It means the current goes mostly on the outside of the section, so you increase your AC losses. Also the conductor closer to the rotor and the airgap sees more varying magnetic flux density which also generate more losses as well as unbalances between wires. The connection of several paths of hairpins also creates unbalances in genral and you can have circulating currents. So in general, it looks easier on paper, or to manufacture and assemble but it means more challenges and less flexibility in the design. I think Tesla kept the wound windings for the simplicity it brings even if it may mean a slightly lower fill factor. They chose initially induction motors over PM motors for the same reason. Regarding the V shape or W shape of the magnets, it is obviously a very sensitive design depending on the performance to achieve, the magnets help for the low speed torque and the V shape acts to create reluctance torque at higher speeds. A tiny change in angle or dimension can change the torque or performance by 10% and the cost of magnet material as well. I work with Altair and we can test and simulate those several multiphysics effects. More than happy to answer any questions.
    607
  36. 602
  37. 601
  38. 600
  39. 585
  40. 575
  41. 566
  42. 558
  43. 552
  44. 537
  45. 537
  46. 533
  47. 532
  48. 524
  49. 520
  50. 518