Hearted Youtube comments on The Rational National (@therationalnational) channel.

  1. 3600
  2. 2600
  3. 2400
  4. 2200
  5. 2100
  6. 1800
  7. 1700
  8. 1700
  9. 1700
  10. 1700
  11. 1600
  12. 1600
  13. 1500
  14. 1500
  15. 1400
  16. 1400
  17. 1400
  18. 1400
  19. 1400
  20. 1400
  21. 1300
  22. 1300
  23. 1300
  24. 1200
  25. 1200
  26. 1200
  27. 1200
  28. 1200
  29. 1200
  30. 1200
  31. 1200
  32. 1100
  33. 1100
  34. 1100
  35. 1100
  36. 1100
  37. 1100
  38. 1100
  39. 1000
  40. 1000
  41. 1000
  42. 1000
  43. 1000
  44. 1000
  45. 1000
  46. 1000
  47. 996
  48. 986
  49. 975
  50. 973
  51. 962
  52. 958
  53. 952
  54. 940
  55. 937
  56. 929
  57. 916
  58. 906
  59. 896
  60. 877
  61. 871
  62. 855
  63. 855
  64. 852
  65. 845
  66. 833
  67. 832
  68. 830
  69. 827
  70. 821
  71. 819
  72. 815
  73. 814
  74. 814
  75. 810
  76. 803
  77. 800
  78. 798
  79. 795
  80. 794
  81. 788
  82. 788
  83. 785
  84. 784
  85. 779
  86. 778
  87. 777
  88. 776
  89. 775
  90. 767
  91. 763
  92. 755
  93. 752
  94. 737
  95. 736
  96. 729
  97. 728
  98. 727
  99. 707
  100. 705
  101. 702
  102. 700
  103. 695
  104. 693
  105. 684
  106. 680
  107. 680
  108. 674
  109. 670
  110. 662
  111. 659
  112. 656
  113. 652
  114. 647
  115. 646
  116. 646
  117. 645
  118. 642
  119. 638
  120. 635
  121. 631
  122. 617
  123. 614
  124. 613
  125. 612
  126. 610
  127. 607
  128. 603
  129. 599
  130. 594
  131. 593
  132. 592
  133. 592
  134. 588
  135. 586
  136. 584
  137. 583
  138. 574
  139. 568
  140. 561
  141. 561
  142. 553
  143. 552
  144. 547
  145. 543
  146. 543
  147. 542
  148. 542
  149. 541
  150. 535
  151. 533
  152. 529
  153. 529
  154. 529
  155. 528
  156. 524
  157. 523
  158. 520
  159. 519
  160. 514
  161. 512
  162. 510
  163. 508
  164. 505
  165. 503
  166. 503
  167. 502
  168. 500
  169. 495
  170. 494
  171. 493
  172. 490
  173. 490
  174. 490
  175. 474
  176. 474
  177. 473
  178. 473
  179. 473
  180. 471
  181. 469
  182. 468
  183. 467
  184. 465
  185. 463
  186. 462
  187. 459
  188. 452
  189. 445
  190. 443
  191. 439
  192. 439
  193. 438
  194. 435
  195. 435
  196. 431
  197. 431
  198. 429
  199. 429
  200. 425
  201. 424
  202. 422
  203. 420
  204. 420
  205. 419
  206. 418
  207. 411
  208. 409
  209. 408
  210. 408
  211. 405
  212. 404
  213. 404
  214. 401
  215. 400
  216. 398
  217. 397
  218. 397
  219. 397
  220. 394
  221. 391
  222. 390
  223. 389
  224. 386
  225. 386
  226. 380
  227. 380
  228. 378
  229. 377
  230. 377
  231. 376
  232. 372
  233. 371
  234. 368
  235. 367
  236. 367
  237. 367
  238. 367
  239. 365
  240. 364
  241. 363
  242. 362
  243. 362
  244. 358
  245. 358
  246. 357
  247. 355
  248. 355
  249. 354
  250. 354
  251. 353
  252. 352
  253. 351
  254. 350
  255. 350
  256. 349
  257. 349
  258. 348
  259. 348
  260. 347
  261. 345
  262. 344
  263. 344
  264. 342
  265. 342
  266. 341
  267. 341
  268. 341
  269. 340
  270. 339
  271. 338
  272. 338
  273. 336
  274. 335
  275. 334
  276. 332
  277. 331
  278. 331
  279. 330
  280. 330
  281. 329
  282. 327
  283. 327
  284. 325
  285. 324
  286. 324
  287. 323
  288. 323
  289. 323
  290. 322
  291. 320
  292. 319
  293. 317
  294. 317
  295. 316
  296. 316
  297. 315
  298. 313
  299. 313
  300. 312
  301. 312
  302. 311
  303. 311
  304. 308
  305. 307
  306. 307
  307. 305
  308. 305
  309. 304
  310. 303
  311. 303
  312. 301
  313. 301
  314. 301
  315. 301
  316. 301
  317. 300
  318. 300
  319. 300
  320. 299
  321. 299
  322. 297
  323. 296
  324. 295
  325. 295
  326. 294
  327. 293
  328. 292
  329. 292
  330. 292
  331. 291
  332. 290
  333. 289
  334. 288
  335. 287
  336. 287
  337. 285
  338. 284
  339. With all due respect to Joy Reid, she does NOT know what the fuck she is talking about with regard to the recent special election in Montana! As a Montanan who knew nothing about Quist, I was eager to find out what he stood for - especially compared to Greg Gianforte, who is a billionaire. Gianforte ran - and LOST - in the 2016 gubernatorial race in Montana. His number one rival/opponent was Steve Bullock, the incumbent, Democratic governor of Montana! Quist did NOT run a good campaign - contrary to Bernie Sander's own statement that "Quist ran a good campaign". Quist did not run a campaign that even remotely resembled the kind of campaign Bernie ran in 2016. I am not sure why Bernie said he did run a good campaign or why Quist did not run one more like Bernie's. Whatever the case, this is an entirely different topic, worthy of full discussion apart from this one. Quist's campaign was predominantly negative. It focused on Gianforte and how 'awful' he was as compared with himself. The only positive things that he included in any of his commercial advertisements were: 1) a promise that he would not institute a sales tax in Montana; 2) a commitment to keeping our public lands open to the public and; 3) a vague assurance that he would not support the 'healthcare' legislation recently passed by Congress and being considered in the Senate. Quist also did what just about every Democrat running for office in Montana does. He showed his support for gun owners. The way he did this was cringe-worthy at best. Quist proudly showed himself carrying a rifle and took a shot at a computer that I believe was supposed to belong to Gianforte. WTF?? To me, this election offered further proof that a negative campaign is a LOSING campaign!! To be sure, Quist had to beat insurmountable odds to win. Gianforte was heavily favored to win this election. After all, Montana had voted in favor of Trump over Clinton by a spread of 21 points. As such, Quist had to run a nearly flawless campaign if he ever hoped to win the election. He did not come close to running a flawless campaign. A final word for those people who have derided and chastised Montanans for electing a person into office who body-slammed a reporter (Yes, Chris Hayes, I am including you as one of the 'deriders') - let me make one thing perfectly clear! The body-slamming incident occurred on the eve of the election. By that time, more than two-thirds of Montanans had already submitted their ballots on it! If this had happened BEFORE most of us had already voted, I believe that Gianforte would have LOST!!
    283
  340. 283
  341. 282
  342. 280
  343. 280
  344. 279
  345. 279
  346. 278
  347. 276
  348. 276
  349. 275
  350. 275
  351. 274
  352. 272
  353. 270
  354. 270
  355. 269
  356. 268
  357. 268
  358. 267
  359. 266
  360. 266
  361. 263
  362. 263
  363. 261
  364. 261
  365. 260
  366. 257
  367. 257
  368. 256
  369. 255
  370. 254
  371. 254
  372. 253
  373. 253
  374. 251
  375. 250
  376. 250
  377. 249
  378. 248
  379. 248
  380. 247
  381. 247
  382. 246
  383. 246
  384. 246
  385. 243
  386. 243
  387. 243
  388. 243
  389. 242
  390. 241
  391. 241
  392. 240
  393. 240
  394. 239
  395. 238
  396. 238
  397. 238
  398. 237
  399. 234
  400. 234
  401. 234
  402. 232
  403. 232
  404. 231
  405. 231
  406. 231
  407. 230
  408. 230
  409. 230
  410. 229
  411. 229
  412. 229
  413. 228
  414. 228
  415. 228
  416. 228
  417. 228
  418. 227
  419. 226
  420. 226
  421. 226
  422. 226
  423. 226
  424. 225
  425. 224
  426. 222
  427. 221
  428. 219
  429. 219
  430. 218
  431. 218
  432. 215
  433. 214
  434. 213
  435. 213
  436. 213
  437. 213
  438. 212
  439. 212
  440. 212
  441. 212
  442. 211
  443. 210
  444. 210
  445. 210
  446. 210
  447. 210
  448. 209
  449. 208
  450. 208
  451. 207
  452. 206
  453. 205
  454. 205
  455. 205
  456. 203
  457. 202
  458. 202
  459. 202
  460. 201
  461. 200
  462. 199
  463. 199
  464. 199
  465. 198
  466. 198
  467. 198
  468. 197
  469. 197
  470. 197
  471. 196
  472. 196
  473. 196
  474. 195
  475. 194
  476. 194
  477. 193
  478. 193
  479. 193
  480. 193
  481. 192
  482. 192
  483. 191
  484. 190
  485. 189
  486. 189
  487. 189
  488. 188
  489. 187
  490. 186
  491. 186
  492. 186
  493. 186
  494. 186
  495. 185
  496. 185
  497. 185
  498. 184
  499. 184
  500. 184
  501. 184
  502. 182
  503. 182
  504. 182
  505. 182
  506. 181
  507. 181
  508. 180
  509. 180
  510. 179
  511. 179
  512. 179
  513. 176
  514. 176
  515. 176
  516. 173
  517. 173
  518. 173
  519. 173
  520. 173
  521. 172
  522. 172
  523. 171
  524. 171
  525. 171
  526. 171
  527. 171
  528. 170
  529. 170
  530. 170
  531. 170
  532. 169
  533. 169
  534. 169
  535. 169
  536. 168
  537. 168
  538. 168
  539. 167
  540. 167
  541. 167
  542. 167
  543. 167
  544. 166
  545. 166
  546. 165
  547. 165
  548. 164
  549. 164
  550. 164
  551. 164
  552. 164
  553. 164
  554. 163
  555. 163
  556. 162
  557. 162
  558. 162
  559. 162
  560. 162
  561. 162
  562. 162
  563. 161
  564. 161
  565. 161
  566. 161
  567. 161
  568. 160
  569. 160
  570. 159
  571. 159
  572. 159
  573. 158
  574. 158
  575. 157
  576. 157
  577. 156
  578. 156
  579. 155
  580. 154
  581. 154
  582. 154
  583. 154
  584. 154
  585. 154
  586. 154
  587. 153
  588. 153
  589. 153
  590. 153
  591. 153
  592. 152
  593. 152
  594. 152
  595. 152
  596. 151
  597. 151
  598. 151
  599. 151
  600. 150
  601. 150
  602. 150
  603. 150
  604. 150
  605. 150
  606. 149
  607. 149
  608. 149
  609. 149
  610. 149
  611. 148
  612. 148
  613. 147
  614. 147
  615. 147
  616. 147
  617. 146
  618. 146
  619. 145
  620. 145
  621. 144
  622. 144
  623. 144
  624. 144
  625. 144
  626. 143
  627. 143
  628. 143
  629. 143
  630. 143
  631. 142
  632. 142
  633. 142
  634. 142
  635. 141
  636. 141
  637. 140
  638. 140
  639. 140
  640. 140
  641. 140
  642. 139
  643. 138
  644. 138
  645. 138
  646. 138
  647. 138
  648. 138
  649. 138
  650. 138
  651. 137
  652. 136
  653. 136
  654. 136
  655. 135
  656. 135
  657. 135
  658. 134
  659. 134
  660. 134
  661. 133
  662. 133
  663. 133
  664. 133
  665. 132
  666. 132
  667. 132
  668. 131
  669. 131
  670. 131
  671. 131
  672. 131
  673. 131
  674. 130
  675. 130
  676. 130
  677. 130
  678. 130
  679. 130
  680. 129
  681. 129
  682. 129
  683. 128
  684. 128
  685. 128
  686. 127
  687. 127
  688. 127
  689. 127
  690. 127
  691. 127
  692. 127
  693. 127
  694. 126
  695. 126
  696. 126
  697. 126
  698. 126
  699. 125
  700. 124
  701. 124
  702. 123
  703. 123
  704. 123
  705. 123
  706. 123
  707. 123
  708. 123
  709. 123
  710. 123
  711. 123
  712. 122
  713. 122
  714. 122
  715. 122
  716. 122
  717. 122
  718. 122
  719. 121
  720. 121
  721. 121
  722. 121
  723. 120
  724. 120
  725. 119
  726. 119
  727. 119
  728. 119
  729. 119
  730. 119
  731. 118
  732. 118
  733. 118
  734. 118
  735. 117
  736. 117
  737. 117
  738. 117
  739. 117
  740. 117
  741. 116
  742. 115
  743. 115
  744. 115
  745. 114
  746. 114
  747. 114
  748. 113
  749. 113
  750. 112
  751. 112
  752. 111
  753. 111
  754. 111
  755. 111
  756. 111
  757. 111
  758. 111
  759. 111
  760. 110
  761. 110
  762. 110
  763. 110
  764. 110
  765. 109
  766. 109
  767. 109
  768. 109
  769. 109
  770. 109
  771. 108
  772. 108
  773. 108
  774. 108
  775. 108
  776. 108
  777. 108
  778. 108
  779. 108
  780. 108
  781. 107
  782. 107
  783. 107
  784. 107
  785. 107
  786. 107
  787. 106
  788. 106
  789. 106
  790. 106
  791. 106
  792. 106
  793. 106
  794. 106
  795. 105
  796. 105
  797. 105
  798. 105
  799. 105
  800. 104
  801. 104
  802. 104
  803. 104
  804. 104
  805. 104
  806. 103
  807. 103
  808. 103
  809. 103
  810. 103
  811. 103
  812. 103
  813. 103
  814. 103
  815. 103
  816. 103
  817. 102
  818. 102
  819. 102
  820. 102
  821. 102
  822. 102
  823. 102
  824. 102
  825. 102
  826. 101
  827. 101
  828. 101
  829. 101
  830. 101
  831. 101
  832. 101
  833. 100
  834. 100
  835. 100
  836. 100
  837. 100
  838. 100
  839. 100
  840. 100
  841. 100
  842. 100
  843. 100
  844. 100
  845. 99
  846. 99
  847. 99
  848. 99
  849. 99
  850. 99
  851. 99
  852. 99
  853. 99
  854. 99
  855. 98
  856. 98
  857. 98
  858. 97
  859. 97
  860. 97
  861. 97
  862. 97
  863. 96
  864. 96
  865. 96
  866. 96
  867. 95
  868. 95
  869. 95
  870. 95
  871. 95
  872. 95
  873. 95
  874. 94
  875. 94
  876. 94
  877. 94
  878. 94
  879. 94
  880. 94
  881. 93
  882. 93
  883. 93
  884. 93
  885. 93
  886. 93
  887. 93
  888. 92
  889. 92
  890. 92
  891. 92
  892. 92
  893. 92
  894. 91
  895. 91
  896. 91
  897. 91
  898. 91
  899. 91
  900. 91
  901. 91
  902. 91
  903. 91
  904. 90
  905. 90
  906. 90
  907. 90
  908. 89
  909. 89
  910. 89
  911. 89
  912. 89
  913. 89
  914. 89
  915. 89
  916. 88
  917. 88
  918. 88
  919. 88
  920. 88
  921. 88
  922. 88
  923. 88
  924. 87
  925. 87
  926. 87
  927. 87
  928. 87
  929. 87
  930. 87
  931. 87
  932. 87
  933. 86
  934. 86
  935. 86
  936. 86
  937. 86
  938. 85
  939. 85
  940. 85
  941. 85
  942. 85
  943. 85
  944. 85
  945. 85
  946. 84
  947. 84
  948. 84
  949. 84
  950. 84
  951. 84
  952. 84
  953. 84
  954. 83
  955. 83
  956. 83
  957. 83
  958. 83
  959. 83
  960. 82
  961. 82
  962. 82
  963. 82
  964. 82
  965. 82
  966. 81
  967. 81
  968. 81
  969. 81
  970. 81
  971. 81
  972. 81
  973. 81
  974. 81
  975. 81
  976. 81
  977. 81
  978. 80
  979. 80
  980. 80
  981. 80
  982. 80
  983. 80
  984. 80
  985. 80
  986. 80
  987. 80
  988. 80
  989. 79
  990. 79
  991. 79
  992. 79
  993. 79
  994. 78
  995. 78
  996. 78
  997. 78
  998. 77
  999. 77
  1000. 77
  1001. 77
  1002. 77
  1003. 77
  1004. 77
  1005. 77
  1006. 76
  1007. 76
  1008. 76
  1009. 76
  1010. 76
  1011. 76
  1012. 75
  1013. 75
  1014. 75
  1015. 75
  1016. 75
  1017. 75
  1018. 75
  1019. 75
  1020. 74
  1021. 74
  1022. 74
  1023. 74
  1024. 74
  1025. 74
  1026. 74
  1027. 74
  1028. 73
  1029. 73
  1030. 73
  1031. 73
  1032. 73
  1033. 73
  1034. 73
  1035. 73
  1036. 73
  1037. 73
  1038. 73
  1039. 73
  1040. 73
  1041. 72
  1042. 72
  1043. 72
  1044. 72
  1045. 72
  1046. 72
  1047. 72
  1048. 72
  1049. 72
  1050. 72
  1051. 72
  1052. 72
  1053. 72
  1054. 71
  1055. 71
  1056. 71
  1057. 71
  1058. 71
  1059. 71
  1060. 71
  1061. 71
  1062. 71
  1063. 70
  1064. 70
  1065. 70
  1066. 70
  1067. 70
  1068. 70
  1069. 70
  1070. 70
  1071. 70
  1072. 70
  1073. 70
  1074. 70
  1075. 70
  1076. 70
  1077. 70
  1078. 70
  1079. 69
  1080. 69
  1081. 69
  1082. 69
  1083. 69
  1084. 69
  1085. 69
  1086. 69
  1087. 69
  1088. 69
  1089. 69
  1090. 69
  1091. 68
  1092. 68
  1093. 68
  1094. 68
  1095. 68
  1096. 68
  1097. 68
  1098. 68
  1099. 68
  1100. 68
  1101. 68
  1102. 67
  1103. 67
  1104. 67
  1105. 67
  1106. 67
  1107. 67
  1108. 67
  1109. 67
  1110. 67
  1111. 67
  1112. 67
  1113. 67
  1114. 66
  1115. 66
  1116. 66
  1117. 66
  1118. 66
  1119. 66
  1120. 66
  1121. 66
  1122. 66
  1123. 66
  1124. 66
  1125. 66
  1126. 66
  1127. 66
  1128. 66
  1129. 66
  1130. 66
  1131. 66
  1132. 66
  1133. 66
  1134. 65
  1135. 65
  1136. 65
  1137. 65
  1138. 65
  1139. 65
  1140. 65
  1141. 65
  1142. 65
  1143. 65
  1144. 65
  1145. 65
  1146. 65
  1147. 65
  1148. 65
  1149. 64
  1150. 64
  1151. 64
  1152. 64
  1153. 64
  1154. 64
  1155. 64
  1156. 64
  1157. 64
  1158. 64
  1159. 64
  1160. 64
  1161. 63
  1162. 63
  1163. 63
  1164. 63
  1165. 63
  1166. 63
  1167. 63
  1168. 63
  1169. 63
  1170. 63
  1171. 63
  1172. 63
  1173. 63
  1174. 62
  1175. 62
  1176. 62
  1177. 62
  1178. 62
  1179. 62
  1180. 62
  1181. 62
  1182. 62
  1183. 62
  1184. 62
  1185. 62
  1186. 62
  1187. 62
  1188. 62
  1189. 62
  1190. 62
  1191. 62
  1192. 61
  1193. 61
  1194. 61
  1195. 61
  1196. 61
  1197. 61
  1198. 61
  1199. 61
  1200. 61
  1201. 61
  1202. 61
  1203. 61
  1204. 61
  1205. 60
  1206. 60
  1207. 60
  1208. 60
  1209. 60
  1210. 60
  1211. 60
  1212. 60
  1213. 59
  1214. 59
  1215. 59
  1216. 59
  1217. 59
  1218. 59
  1219. 59
  1220. 59
  1221. 59
  1222. 59
  1223. 59
  1224. 59
  1225. 59
  1226. 59
  1227. 58
  1228. 58
  1229. 58
  1230. 58
  1231. 58
  1232. 58
  1233. 58
  1234. 58
  1235. 58
  1236. 58
  1237. 58
  1238. 58
  1239. 58
  1240. 58
  1241. 58
  1242. 58
  1243. 58
  1244. 58
  1245. 58
  1246. 58
  1247. 58
  1248. 58
  1249. 58
  1250. 58
  1251. 58
  1252. 58
  1253. 57
  1254. 57
  1255. 57
  1256. 57
  1257. 57
  1258. 57
  1259. Thank you. I hadn’t read any of the previous posts in question and I didn’t care to because I knew they were from a time when he was a conservative, he has always owned his prior views, and I know what his views are now. Now that I have seen one, if this is representative of the other comments, what the hell! I can totally hear him saying that and I know that it was a backhanded comment about himself and not actually about women. As a woman, I can’t even describe my feelings about what I hope is a change to the systematic discrimination/abuse of women in this country. However, there have been instances where I feel condemnation has been unwarranted and a definite (and I hate to use a trump term) witchhunt. You can’t take issue with every comment made in the past (and I’m not talking about actual criminal action) especially if it is obvious that person no longer shares that view. This is definitely one of them. A hypocrite who believes one thing and says another and even those who have changed their talking points for monetary reasons is one thing. Someone who has grown, changed their views and now fights for a new cause has nothing in common with that. And I’m not using the term ā€œgrownā€ to mean from a young person to an adult. The argument that he was 29 or so when he made the comments is irrelevant and stupid. It is personal growth which can happen when you’re 20 or 80. I feel the Justice Democrats were wrong and that they were untruthful in their comments. I think they were reacting out of fear. The cause is really starting to gain ground and I think they did not want to taint it with any controversy. However, I think they’ve achieved the opposite. It definitely should’ve been addressed but in an honest less knee-jerk fashion. I still believe in the candidates and in Justice Democrats and will continue to support both. But I hope they will reassess and walk back their comments on Cenk. They’ve made an issue over what I feel is a non-issue.
    57
  1260. 57
  1261. 57
  1262. 57
  1263. 57
  1264. 57
  1265. 57
  1266. 57
  1267. 57
  1268. 57
  1269. 57
  1270. 57
  1271. 57
  1272. 57
  1273. 57
  1274. 57
  1275. 57
  1276. 57
  1277. 56
  1278. 56
  1279. 56
  1280. 56
  1281. 56
  1282. 56
  1283. 56
  1284. 56
  1285. 56
  1286. 56
  1287. 56
  1288. 56
  1289. 56
  1290. 56
  1291. 56
  1292. 56
  1293. 56
  1294. 56
  1295. 55
  1296. 55
  1297. 55
  1298. 55
  1299. 55
  1300. 55
  1301. 55
  1302. 55
  1303. 55
  1304. 55
  1305. 55
  1306. 55
  1307. 55
  1308. 55
  1309. 54
  1310. 54
  1311. 54
  1312. 54
  1313. 54
  1314. 54
  1315. 54
  1316. 54
  1317. 54
  1318. 54
  1319. 54
  1320. 54
  1321. 54
  1322. 54
  1323. 54
  1324. 54
  1325. 54
  1326. 53
  1327. 53
  1328. 53
  1329. 53
  1330. 53
  1331. 53
  1332. 53
  1333. 53
  1334. 53
  1335. 53
  1336. 53
  1337. 53
  1338. 53
  1339. 53
  1340. 53
  1341. 53
  1342. 53
  1343. 52
  1344. 52
  1345. 52
  1346. 52
  1347. 52
  1348. 52
  1349. 52
  1350. 52
  1351. 52
  1352. 52
  1353. 52
  1354. 52
  1355. 52
  1356. 52
  1357. 52
  1358. 52
  1359. 52
  1360. 52
  1361. 52
  1362. 52
  1363. 52
  1364. 52
  1365. 52
  1366. 51
  1367. 51
  1368. 51
  1369. 51
  1370. 51
  1371. 51
  1372. 51
  1373. 51
  1374. 51
  1375. 51
  1376. 51
  1377. 51
  1378. 51
  1379. 51
  1380. 51
  1381. 51
  1382. 51
  1383. 51
  1384. 51
  1385. 51
  1386. 51
  1387. 51
  1388. 51
  1389. 51
  1390. 51
  1391. 51
  1392. 51
  1393. 50
  1394. 50
  1395. 50
  1396. 50
  1397. 50
  1398. 50
  1399. 50
  1400. 50
  1401. 50
  1402. 50
  1403. 50
  1404. 50
  1405. 50
  1406. 50
  1407. 50
  1408. 50
  1409. 50
  1410. 50
  1411. 50
  1412. 49
  1413. 49
  1414. 49
  1415. 49
  1416. 49
  1417. 49
  1418. 49
  1419. 49
  1420. 49
  1421. 49
  1422. 49
  1423. 49
  1424. 49
  1425. 49
  1426. 49
  1427. 49
  1428. 49
  1429. 49
  1430. 49
  1431. 49
  1432. 49
  1433. 49
  1434. 49
  1435. 49
  1436. 48
  1437. 48
  1438. 48
  1439. 48
  1440. 48
  1441. 48
  1442. 48
  1443. 48
  1444. 48
  1445. 48
  1446. 48
  1447. 48
  1448. 48
  1449. 48
  1450. 48
  1451. 48
  1452. 48
  1453. 48
  1454. 48
  1455. 48
  1456. 48
  1457. 47
  1458. 47
  1459. 47
  1460. 47
  1461. 47
  1462. 47
  1463. 47
  1464. 47
  1465. 47
  1466. 47
  1467. 47
  1468. 47
  1469. 47
  1470. 47
  1471. 47
  1472. 47
  1473. 47
  1474. 47
  1475. 47
  1476. 47
  1477. 46
  1478. 46
  1479. 46
  1480. 46
  1481. 46
  1482. 46
  1483. 46
  1484. 46
  1485. 46
  1486. 46
  1487. 46
  1488. 46
  1489. 46
  1490. 46
  1491. 46
  1492. 46
  1493. 46
  1494. 46
  1495. 46
  1496. 46
  1497. 46
  1498. 46
  1499. 46
  1500. 46
  1501. 46
  1502. 45
  1503. 45
  1504. 45
  1505. 45
  1506. 45
  1507. 45
  1508. 45
  1509. 45
  1510. 45
  1511. 45
  1512. 45
  1513. 45
  1514. 45
  1515. 45
  1516. 45
  1517. 45
  1518. 45
  1519. 45
  1520. 45
  1521. 45
  1522. 45
  1523. 45
  1524. 45
  1525. 45
  1526. 45
  1527. 44
  1528. 44
  1529. 44
  1530. 44
  1531. 44
  1532. 44
  1533. 44
  1534. 44
  1535. 44
  1536. 44
  1537. 44
  1538. 44
  1539. 44
  1540. 44
  1541. 44
  1542. 44
  1543. 44
  1544. 44
  1545. 44
  1546. 44
  1547. 44
  1548. 44
  1549. 43
  1550. 43
  1551. 43
  1552. 43
  1553. 43
  1554. 43
  1555. 43
  1556. 43
  1557. 43
  1558. 43
  1559. 43
  1560. 43
  1561. 43
  1562. 43
  1563. 43
  1564. 43
  1565. 43
  1566. 43
  1567. 43
  1568. 43
  1569. 43
  1570. 43
  1571. 43
  1572. 43
  1573. 43
  1574. 43
  1575. 43
  1576. 43
  1577. 42
  1578. 42
  1579. 42
  1580. 42
  1581. 42
  1582. 42
  1583. 42
  1584. 42
  1585. 42
  1586. 42
  1587. 42
  1588. 42
  1589. 42
  1590. 42
  1591. 42
  1592. 41
  1593. 41
  1594. 41
  1595. 41
  1596. 41
  1597. 41
  1598. 41
  1599. 41
  1600. 41
  1601. 41
  1602. 41
  1603. 41
  1604. 41
  1605. 41
  1606. 41
  1607. 41
  1608. 41
  1609. 41
  1610. 41
  1611. 41
  1612. 41
  1613. 41
  1614. 41
  1615. 41
  1616. 41
  1617. 41
  1618. 41
  1619. 41
  1620. 41
  1621. 41
  1622. 41
  1623. 41
  1624. 40
  1625. 40
  1626. 40
  1627. 40
  1628. 40
  1629. 40
  1630. 40
  1631. 40
  1632. 40
  1633. 40
  1634. 40
  1635. 40
  1636. 40
  1637. 40
  1638. 40
  1639. 40
  1640. 40
  1641. 40
  1642. 40
  1643. 40
  1644. 40
  1645. 40
  1646. 40
  1647. 40
  1648. 40
  1649. 40
  1650. 39
  1651. 39
  1652. My country, Portugal, is a good example of how neoliberal/neoconservative politics and austerity are absolutely ineffective and hurt the middle class. After the 2008 financial crisis, we had a center right party in power (who, ironically, got elected for criticizing the previous government's plans for austerity) that spent 4 years implementing austerity: more taxes, higher taxes, frozen career progression, cuts to social security, pensions, etc. The middle class took a giant toll because the party wanted to appease the UE and the IMF, the latter even sent a special team called "troika" to analyze our situation, that advised our government to implement even more austerity. After 4 years, the middle class was poorer, the economy was worse, unemployment was worse, AND a half a dozen of the biggest banks crashed (despite "troika's" thorough analysis, they seemed to have missed that coming). No one was held accountable for the banks, and tax payers ended up having to inject millions back into them 2015 elections come, and while that same party (actually a coalition of 2 right wing parties) had the highest percentage of the vote, there were more votes on the left dispersed over 3 different parties. So they decided to make a coalition of their own and ended up being the ones holding government. The right wing coalition called it a coup, said the "devil" was coming because a left coalition would overspend and bankrupt the country. The new left wing government ended austerity, returned people their pensions and their salaries, raised the minimum wage, and more... Results? The economy is flourishing, unemployment has been reduced significantly, exports are higher, the deficit is the lowest it's ever been in the past 40 years.
    39
  1653. 39
  1654. 39
  1655. 39
  1656. 39
  1657. 39
  1658. 39
  1659. 39
  1660. 39
  1661. 39
  1662. 39
  1663. 39
  1664. 39
  1665. 39
  1666. 39
  1667. 39
  1668. 39
  1669. 39
  1670. 39
  1671. 39
  1672. 39
  1673. 39
  1674. 39
  1675. 39
  1676. 39
  1677. 39
  1678. 39
  1679. 39
  1680. 39
  1681. 39
  1682. 39
  1683. 39
  1684. 39
  1685. 38
  1686. 38
  1687. 38
  1688. 38
  1689. 38
  1690. 38
  1691. 38
  1692. 38
  1693. 38
  1694. 38
  1695. 38
  1696. 38
  1697. 38
  1698. 38
  1699. 38
  1700. 38
  1701. 38
  1702. 38
  1703. 38
  1704. 38
  1705. 38
  1706. 38
  1707. 38
  1708. 38
  1709. 38
  1710. 38
  1711. 38
  1712. 38
  1713. 38
  1714. 37
  1715. 37
  1716. 37
  1717. 37
  1718. 37
  1719. 37
  1720. 37
  1721. 37
  1722. 37
  1723. 37
  1724. 37
  1725. 37
  1726. 37
  1727. 37
  1728. 37
  1729. 37
  1730. 37
  1731. 37
  1732. 37
  1733. 37
  1734. 37
  1735. 37
  1736. 37
  1737. 37
  1738. 37
  1739. 37
  1740. 37
  1741. 37
  1742. 37
  1743. 37
  1744. 36
  1745. 36
  1746. 36
  1747. 36
  1748. 36
  1749. 36
  1750. 36
  1751. 36
  1752. 36
  1753. 36
  1754. 36
  1755. 36
  1756. 36
  1757. 36
  1758. 36
  1759. 36
  1760. 36
  1761. 36
  1762. 36
  1763. 36
  1764. 36
  1765. 36
  1766. 36
  1767. 36
  1768. 36
  1769. 36
  1770. 36
  1771. 36
  1772. 36
  1773. 36
  1774. 36
  1775. 36
  1776. 36
  1777. 36
  1778. 36
  1779. 35
  1780. 35
  1781. 35
  1782. 35
  1783. 35
  1784. 35
  1785. 35
  1786. 35
  1787. 35
  1788. 35
  1789. 35
  1790. 35
  1791. 35
  1792. 35
  1793. 35
  1794. 35
  1795. 35
  1796. 35
  1797. 35
  1798. 35
  1799. 35
  1800. 35
  1801. 35
  1802. 35
  1803. 35
  1804. 35
  1805. 35
  1806. 35
  1807. 35
  1808. 35
  1809. 35
  1810. 35
  1811. 35
  1812. 35
  1813. 35
  1814. 35
  1815. 35
  1816. 35
  1817. 35
  1818. 34
  1819. 34
  1820. 34
  1821. 34
  1822. 34
  1823. 34
  1824. 34
  1825. 34
  1826. 34
  1827. 34
  1828. 34
  1829. 34
  1830. 34
  1831. 34
  1832. 34
  1833. 34
  1834. 34
  1835. 34
  1836. 34
  1837. 34
  1838. 34
  1839. 34
  1840. 34
  1841. 34
  1842. 34
  1843. 34
  1844. 34
  1845. 34
  1846. 34
  1847. 34
  1848. 34
  1849. 34
  1850. 34
  1851. 34
  1852. 34
  1853. 33
  1854. 33
  1855. 33
  1856. 33
  1857. 33
  1858. 33
  1859. 33
  1860. 33
  1861. 33
  1862. 33
  1863. 33
  1864. 33
  1865. 33
  1866. 33
  1867. 33
  1868. 33
  1869. 33
  1870. 33
  1871. 33
  1872. 33
  1873. 33
  1874. 33
  1875. 33
  1876. 33
  1877. 33
  1878. 33
  1879. 33
  1880. 33
  1881. 33
  1882. 33
  1883. 33
  1884. 33
  1885. 33
  1886. 33
  1887. 33
  1888. 33
  1889. 33
  1890. 33
  1891. 33
  1892. 32
  1893. 32
  1894. 32
  1895. 32
  1896. 32
  1897. 32
  1898. 32
  1899. 32
  1900. 32
  1901. 32
  1902. 32
  1903. 32
  1904. 32
  1905. 32
  1906. 32
  1907. 32
  1908. 32
  1909. 32
  1910. 32
  1911. 32
  1912. 32
  1913. 32
  1914. 32
  1915. 32
  1916. 32
  1917. 32
  1918. 32
  1919. 32
  1920. 32
  1921. 32
  1922. Dean Cutler I once believed that. And I grant you you have a noble intention, I’m sure. However you do realize that your right-libertarian/anarcho capitalist vision would completely destroy civil rights in the United States, right? It would quickly revert back into pre-civil rights era savagery. After the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts you get considerable more racial equality and national prosperity, despite the reduction of some negative freedom, I believe net freedom for all peoples was increased. Pure negative freedom would undermine all progress towards racial/sexual/religious freedom. That’s why during the civil rights era the bigots of the south switched from language of segregation to language of negative freedom, and freedom of association. That’s why they say ā€œit’s my right to live in peaceā€ or ā€œI can discriminate against who I like. It’s my right.ā€ To enforce de facto, not de jure, segregation. That’s why the Republican Party of today has its strongest supporters in the same states that supported Jim Crow and made up the Confederacy, for one. It’s all told to us very well in a book called ā€œWhite Flightā€ by Kevin Kruse. The local white homeowners in Atlanta resisted actual desegregation for many years after old Jim Crow laws were repealed, until the civil rights legislation came in. This phenomenon actually spread in the reaction to civil rights in the 70s, and civil rights has been able to curb it to a great extent. But they continue to be successful at it in many ways to this day. You’ve heard of white flight, the practice of redlining, and the tyranny of local homeowners’ associations. Read the Kruse book. Understand it. You’re young I imagine and so am I. We don’t really appreciate how terrible things were in those times. We imagined people would just play nice once you remove the state. Not true. You say we shouldn’t interfere in private business, well then does that mean you’re ok with legalizing slavery? I know slavery was often enforced by states, but often times it operated outside of the law, and if there’s no government there there’s very little to prevent slave markets from being established. Look at Africa. I’m not talking Stalinism or authoritarianism, but you do need strong liberal (in the classical sense) government to enforce these norms. Sorry. I’m sure you’ll come around.
    32
  1923. 32
  1924. 32
  1925. 32
  1926. 32
  1927. 32
  1928. 32
  1929. 32
  1930. 32
  1931. 32
  1932. 32
  1933. 32
  1934. 32
  1935. 32
  1936. 32
  1937. 32
  1938. 32
  1939. 32
  1940. 32
  1941. 32
  1942. 32
  1943. 32
  1944. 32
  1945. 32
  1946. 31
  1947. 31
  1948. 31
  1949. 31
  1950. 31
  1951. 31
  1952. 31
  1953. 31
  1954. 31
  1955. 31
  1956. 31
  1957. 31
  1958. 31
  1959. 31
  1960. 31
  1961. 31
  1962. 31
  1963. 31
  1964. 31
  1965. 31
  1966. 31
  1967. 31
  1968. 31
  1969. 31
  1970. 31
  1971. 31
  1972. 31
  1973. 31
  1974. 31
  1975. 31
  1976. 31
  1977. 31
  1978. 31
  1979. 31
  1980. 30
  1981. 30
  1982. 30
  1983. 30
  1984. 30
  1985. 30
  1986. 30
  1987. 30
  1988. 30
  1989. 30
  1990. 30
  1991. 30
  1992. 30
  1993. 30
  1994. 30
  1995. 30
  1996. 30
  1997. 30
  1998. 30
  1999. 30
  2000. 30
  2001. 30
  2002. 30
  2003. 30
  2004. 30
  2005. 30
  2006. 30
  2007. 30
  2008. 30
  2009. 30
  2010. 30
  2011. 30
  2012. 30
  2013. 30
  2014. 30
  2015. 30
  2016. 30
  2017. 30
  2018. 30
  2019. 30
  2020. 30
  2021. 29
  2022. 29
  2023. 29
  2024. 29
  2025. 29
  2026. 29
  2027. 29
  2028. 29
  2029. De-platforming is a very effective way to diminish the influence of any individual who may pose as a threat to anyone, especially if we are speaking on conspiracy theorists and reactionary-minded individuals who would create a cesspool of misinformation. Though, it is much easier when those have a smaller circle of influence to de-platform than those with a larger base. However, the endgame remains the same and that is the individual cannot espouse rhetoric on a larger scale. Those who are ardent "free-speech activists" don't seem to understand that, in the most civil libertarian means, we police ourselves, and thus, we do have the right to object and even take action to reassure that deplorable hate speech or misinformation cannot be further spread. Sadly, they prefer to exercise a sense of entitlement, as oppose to exercising personal accountability when it happens. When it comes to social networks, as long as they have guidelines, and if individuals wind up breaking them, they have every right to remove them from their platform, especially if we are talking about individuals like Alex Jones. They are still free to speak their rhetoric, but YouTube does not have to be forced to accommodate that individual, under the false pretense of free speech. If there is a slippery slope to be had, it is how we allow those on the Right to manipulate the conversation and create a false narrative, basically confusing the general populace, who are very simple in their thinking and bring to respond in a very fear-based manner. And thus, the result of that is what occurred in 2016, when Agent Orange was elected in the White House. So, "more speech" is never the answer in this regard. That's often regurgitated by those from a position a privilege, and not by those who are genuinely concerned about providing a more equitable future for everyone.
    29
  2030. 29
  2031. 29
  2032. 29
  2033. 29
  2034. 29
  2035. 29
  2036. 29
  2037. 29
  2038. 29
  2039. 29
  2040. 29
  2041. 29
  2042. 29
  2043. 29
  2044. 29
  2045. 29
  2046. 29
  2047. 29
  2048. 29
  2049. 29
  2050. 29
  2051. 29
  2052. 29
  2053. 29
  2054. 29
  2055. 29
  2056. 29
  2057. 29
  2058. 29
  2059. 28
  2060. 28
  2061. 28
  2062. 28
  2063. 28
  2064. 28
  2065. 28
  2066. 28
  2067. 28
  2068. 28
  2069. 28
  2070. 28
  2071. 28
  2072. 28
  2073. 28
  2074. 28
  2075. 28
  2076. 28
  2077. 28
  2078. 28
  2079. 28
  2080. 28
  2081. 28
  2082. 28
  2083. 28
  2084. 28
  2085. 28
  2086. 28
  2087. 28
  2088. 28
  2089. 28
  2090. 28
  2091. 28
  2092. 28
  2093. 28
  2094. 28
  2095. 28
  2096. 28
  2097. 28
  2098. 28
  2099. 28
  2100. 28
  2101. 28
  2102. 28
  2103. 28
  2104. 28
  2105. 28
  2106. 28
  2107. 28
  2108. 28
  2109. 28
  2110. 27
  2111. 27
  2112. 27
  2113. 27
  2114. 27
  2115. 27
  2116. 27
  2117. 27
  2118. 27
  2119. 27
  2120. 27
  2121. 27
  2122. 27
  2123. 27
  2124. 27
  2125. 27
  2126. 27
  2127. 27
  2128. 27
  2129. 27
  2130. 27
  2131. 27
  2132. 27
  2133. 27
  2134. 27
  2135. 27
  2136. 27
  2137. 27
  2138. 27
  2139. 27
  2140. 27
  2141. 27
  2142. 27
  2143. 27
  2144. 27
  2145. 27
  2146. 27
  2147. 27
  2148. 27
  2149. 27
  2150. 27
  2151. What unbelievable bull shit. Can it be any wonder that the Democratic party has lost all over the place, that they lost to Donald Trump? Bernie Sanders is one of the MOST self aware politicians around. What in God's name is negative toward Barrack in these remarks? That he's charismatic? That his charisma outshines the poor performance of the party slugs? I would hope #45 himself might weigh in on this slander, tell us whether he regards it as in any way disparaging of himself? Oh, and one further thing. Suppose that Bernie HAD said something negative about Barrack, just for the sake of argument. Why would that reflect negatively on MLK, Jr.?? I have long been convinced and told to anyone who would listen that MLK, Jr. was the greatest American leader of the 20th century, and I underscore that in a personal sense. I mean, he was MY greatest leader, not just generally, but he was MY greatest leader, the one I esteemed above all, the one who led me in coming up years, who made me do stuff, who captured my ideals and my political actions springing from those ideals. Given that Bernie and I share political upbringing in the 50s and 60s, including notably being followers of MLK, Jr., I cannot imagine that Bernie would hold MLK, Jr., in any but the greatest awe. Why then would Bakari Sellars somehow infer that IF BERNIE were saying something critical about Barrack (which he was not), that necessarily reflects negatively on MLK, Jr? Why would it be an insult to MLK, Jr., to say something critical of a contemporary black democratic politician? Is Obama somehow elevated to sainthood because he's the first black man elected President? Do you think we white folks from the civil rights era did nothing to get Barrack elected? Do you think Jessie Jackson's tears were somehow wetter than ours the night Barrack won? I do not. I think we were crying from a shared well of experience, or, of course, not exactly the same, but deeply shared. There is something dreadfully wrong in Sellars interpretation of these events.
    27
  2152. 27
  2153. 27
  2154. 26
  2155. 26
  2156. 26
  2157. 26
  2158. 26
  2159. 26
  2160. 26
  2161. 26
  2162. 26
  2163. 26
  2164. 26
  2165. 26
  2166. 26
  2167. 26
  2168. 26
  2169. 26
  2170. 26
  2171. 26
  2172. 26
  2173. 26
  2174. 26
  2175. 26
  2176. David, I actually very much agree with most of what you said. You are right, this is in fact a culture war issue. What's amazing is that I probably would have disagreed with you earlier in the year, but the issue with Sarah Huckabee Sanders is what opened my eyes. People on the left are almost always playing defence against the the right while simultaneously defending the right as well. Trump enacts a terrible and fascist policy that separates children from their parents, a member from his administration is politely asked to leave a restuarant after a vote from the working staff; because customers there may have a problem with her being there due to the administration's horrible actions, the right makes it seem like they're always being victimized by the left, and the response from the many on the left is "we shouldn't let this happen because it might set a precedent where people begin kicking others out of restuarants because of differing political views". If the right shared this same principle, I'd agree. The problem is many on the right claim that private businesses SHOULD have the right to do just that. The right uses the left's fears of the possibility of them being censored or in some way having a privilege taken away against them. People on the right would NEVER defend the left the way the left is defending Alex Jones. This gives Alex Jones and others like him more power. Reasons like this is why the playing field is not even. I am concerned that this might set a precedent, but I am more concerned about the precedent that has been set already. If you don't learn from history you are doomed to repeat it. It is possible that this might set a precedent, but history has shown us that it is a GUARANTEE that the right will use their power to shame, silence, and defame their opposition. Alex Jones is not a victim. He brought this on himself. He has caused others to be victims. We can not continue to let the right play the victim and 'free speech' card. They do not care about freedom of speech or expression. If they did they would want the NFL to rehire Colin Kaepernick the way the left wants Alex Jones to be replatformed. The right has control of every branch of government, they most likely will in the future control the Supreme Court. They accuse the left on shutting down speech at college campuses when recent data has proven the right shuts down speech a lot more; and they are now trying to punish teachers who criticize or have disagreements with their side while trying to change academia to benefit their ideology. They accuse the left of of worshiping celebrities but they love Trump, Regan, and others like Kid Rock (who at least at one time wanted to run for office). Many people on the left did not want Oprah to run for President when it was believed she might. They accuse the left of being cult like but they are the ones who never criticize their leaders / representatives. I still remember progressives getting upset with Bernie when he endorsed Hillary Clinton and when he went on that tour with Tom Perez. I should make it clear that not everyone on the right likes Trump or is a bad person. I've ranted enough. Good video.
    26
  2177. 26
  2178. 26
  2179. 26
  2180. 26
  2181. 26
  2182. 26
  2183. 26
  2184. 26
  2185. 26
  2186. 26
  2187. 26
  2188. 26
  2189. 26
  2190. 26
  2191. 26
  2192. 26
  2193. 26
  2194. 26
  2195. 26
  2196. 26
  2197. 26
  2198. 25
  2199. 25
  2200. 25
  2201. 25
  2202. 25
  2203. 25
  2204. 25
  2205. 25
  2206. 25
  2207. 25
  2208. 25
  2209. 25
  2210. 25
  2211. 25
  2212. 25
  2213. 25
  2214. 25
  2215. 25
  2216. 25
  2217. 25
  2218. 25
  2219. 25
  2220. 25
  2221. 25
  2222. 25
  2223. 25
  2224. 25
  2225. 25
  2226. 25
  2227. 25
  2228. 25
  2229. 25
  2230. 25
  2231. 25
  2232. 25
  2233. 25
  2234. 25
  2235. 25
  2236. 25
  2237. 25
  2238. 25
  2239. 25
  2240. 25
  2241. 25
  2242. 25
  2243. 25
  2244. 25
  2245. 25
  2246. 25
  2247. 25
  2248. 25
  2249. 25
  2250. 24
  2251. 24
  2252. 24
  2253. 24
  2254. 24
  2255. 24
  2256. 24
  2257. 24
  2258. 24
  2259. 24
  2260. 24
  2261. 24
  2262. 24
  2263. 24
  2264. 24
  2265. 24
  2266. 24
  2267. 24
  2268. 24
  2269. 24
  2270. 24
  2271. 24
  2272. 24
  2273. 24
  2274. 24
  2275. 24
  2276. 24
  2277. 24
  2278. 24
  2279. 24
  2280. 24
  2281. I think I am SOLD on the NDP now. If what he is saying stays true.... I know he has my vote! I voted conservative last time because I felt they were the least offensive. If Jagmeet Singh sticks to and runs on what he just said, it's a done deal for me! Now onto my comments. Your basic income argument.... It's a complex argument... If Welfare and min wage becomes the same..... I am sure for some it would be hard to motivate them to continue to work.... I feel radical changes need to be made within those programs to prevent abuse.... But I do feel it would be great that if you honestly fell on hard times, that the government will properly support you... Also looking at Canada Pension.... They deserve more no doubt.... but the money needs to come from somewhere.... but if you worked min wage jobs your whole life or just a little over... How can you expect to retire and survive when your only going to get 55% of your original wages moving forward. Worse yet now you likely have all kinds of medications that are expensive.... So on that note I do hope something can be done for government coverage of that. Just like our healthcare. and Dentistry should also be considered part of health care! If he is able to generate enough money from his changes to policy, I fully support this happening! Please keep reporting about him! as well about all the other candidates in our next election! Having you spoon feed me all this is allot more easy then me spending hours digging online for information!
    24
  2282. 24
  2283. 24
  2284. 24
  2285. 24
  2286. 24
  2287. 24
  2288. 24
  2289. 24
  2290. 24
  2291. 24
  2292. 24
  2293. 24
  2294. 24
  2295. 23
  2296. 23
  2297. 23
  2298. 23
  2299. 23
  2300. 23
  2301. 23
  2302. 23
  2303. 23
  2304. 23
  2305. 23
  2306. 23
  2307. 23
  2308. 23
  2309. 23
  2310. 23
  2311. 23
  2312. 23
  2313. 23
  2314. 23
  2315. 23
  2316. 23
  2317. 23
  2318. 23
  2319. 23
  2320. 23
  2321. 23
  2322. 23
  2323. 23
  2324. 23
  2325. 23
  2326. 23
  2327. 23
  2328. 23
  2329. 23
  2330. 23
  2331. 23
  2332. 23
  2333. 23
  2334. 23
  2335. 23
  2336. 23
  2337. 23
  2338. 23
  2339. 23
  2340. 23
  2341. 23
  2342. 23
  2343. 23
  2344. 23
  2345. 23
  2346. 23
  2347. 23
  2348. 23
  2349. 23
  2350. 23
  2351. 23
  2352. 23
  2353. 23
  2354. 23
  2355. 22
  2356. 22
  2357. 22
  2358. 22
  2359. 22
  2360. 22
  2361. 22
  2362. 22
  2363. 22
  2364. 22
  2365. 22
  2366. 22
  2367. 22
  2368. 22
  2369. 22
  2370. 22
  2371. 22
  2372. 22
  2373. 22
  2374. 22
  2375. 22
  2376. 22
  2377. 22
  2378. 22
  2379. 22
  2380. 22
  2381. 22
  2382. 22
  2383. 22
  2384. 22
  2385. 22
  2386. 22
  2387. 22
  2388. 22
  2389. 22
  2390. 22
  2391. 22
  2392. 22
  2393. 22
  2394. 22
  2395. 22
  2396. 22
  2397. 22
  2398. 22
  2399. 22
  2400. 22
  2401. 22
  2402. 22
  2403. 22
  2404. 22
  2405. 22
  2406. 22
  2407. 22
  2408. 22
  2409. 21
  2410. 21
  2411. 21
  2412. 21
  2413. 21
  2414. 21
  2415. 21
  2416. 21
  2417. 21
  2418. 21
  2419. 21
  2420. 21
  2421. 21
  2422. 21
  2423. 21
  2424. 21
  2425. 21
  2426. 21
  2427. 21
  2428. 21
  2429. 21
  2430. 21
  2431. 21
  2432. 21
  2433. 21
  2434. 21
  2435. 21
  2436. 21
  2437. 21
  2438. 21
  2439. 21
  2440. 21
  2441. 21
  2442. 21
  2443. 21
  2444. 21
  2445. 21
  2446. 21
  2447. 21
  2448. 21
  2449. 21
  2450. 21
  2451. 21
  2452. 21
  2453. 21
  2454. 21
  2455. 21
  2456. 21
  2457. 21
  2458. 21
  2459. 21
  2460. 21
  2461. 21
  2462. 21
  2463. 21
  2464. 21
  2465. 21
  2466. 21
  2467. 21
  2468. 21
  2469. 21
  2470. 20
  2471. 20
  2472. 20
  2473. 20
  2474. 20
  2475. 20
  2476. 20
  2477. 20
  2478. 20
  2479. 20
  2480. 20
  2481. 20
  2482. 20
  2483. 20
  2484. 20
  2485. 20
  2486. 20
  2487. 20
  2488. 20
  2489. 20
  2490. 20
  2491. 20
  2492. 20
  2493. 20
  2494. 20
  2495. 20
  2496. 20
  2497. 20
  2498. 20
  2499. 20
  2500. 20
  2501. 20
  2502. 20
  2503. 20
  2504. 20
  2505. 20
  2506. 20
  2507. 20
  2508. 20
  2509. 20
  2510. 20
  2511. 20
  2512. 20
  2513. 20
  2514. 20
  2515. 20
  2516. 20
  2517. 20
  2518. 20
  2519. 20
  2520. 20
  2521. 20
  2522. 20
  2523. 20
  2524. The Bee Movie recently came on Netflix, and me and my family decided to watch it for the meme. I largely enjoyed, but as the movie went on I noticed something sinister. The Bee Movie is fascist propaganda. My family thought I was insane but it's true. Let's look at the story here. Barry B. Benson, faced with the soul-sucking repetitiveness of proletarian life working for Honex, decides to try to free himself and goes outside of the hive. After doing outside stuff, he figures out that bees are being exploited by humans, because humans are expropriating their honey/surplus value. Barry, having achieved class consciousness, starts a lawsuit/proletarian revolution. Barry, with the help of the bee proletariat, wins. Post-scarcity is reached, and fully automated luxury bee communism is achieved. It should be paradise. However, this is not where the movie ends. Because of some bullshit mismanagement, bees just stop doing anything, including pollination. The world's vegetation begins to die, and Barry has to deal with the guilt of closing his class-traitor girlfriend's flower shop and spelling the end of life on earth as we know it. To solve the issue, the bees work with the humans to solve the crisis, and afterwards, bees continue to make honey and allow humans to use it. In other words, they solve their problems by ending fully automated luxury bee communism and promoting FUCKING CLASS COLLABORATION. How dare Jerry Seinfeld imply that fully automated luxury bee communism would doom us? How dare he try to tell us that fascist class collaboration is the answer? Who knew that by watching and sharing increasingly accelerating apian cinematic memes we were helping the enemy? I don't beelieve it.
    19
  2525. 19
  2526. 19
  2527. 19
  2528. 19
  2529. 19
  2530. 19
  2531. 19
  2532. 19
  2533. 19
  2534. 19
  2535. 19
  2536. 19
  2537. 19
  2538. 19
  2539. 19
  2540. 19
  2541. 19
  2542. 19
  2543. 19
  2544. 19
  2545. 19
  2546. 19
  2547. 19
  2548. 19
  2549. 19
  2550. 19
  2551. 19
  2552. 19
  2553. 19
  2554. 19
  2555. 19
  2556. 19
  2557. 19
  2558. 19
  2559. 19
  2560. 19
  2561. 19
  2562. 19
  2563. 19
  2564. 19
  2565. 19
  2566. 19
  2567. 19
  2568. 19
  2569. 19
  2570. 19
  2571. 19
  2572. 19
  2573. 19
  2574. 19
  2575. 19
  2576. 19
  2577. 19
  2578. 19
  2579. 19
  2580. 19
  2581. 19
  2582. 19
  2583. 19
  2584. 19
  2585. 19
  2586. 19
  2587. 19
  2588. 19
  2589. 19
  2590. 19
  2591. 19
  2592. 19
  2593. 19
  2594. 18
  2595. 18
  2596. 18
  2597. 18
  2598. 18
  2599. 18
  2600. 18
  2601. 18
  2602. 18
  2603. 18
  2604. 18
  2605. 18
  2606. 18
  2607. 18
  2608. 18
  2609. 18
  2610. 18
  2611. 18
  2612. 18
  2613. 18
  2614. 18
  2615. 18
  2616. 18
  2617. 18
  2618. 18
  2619. 18
  2620. 18
  2621. 18
  2622. 18
  2623. 18
  2624. 18
  2625. 18
  2626. 18
  2627. 18
  2628. 18
  2629. 18
  2630. 18
  2631. 18
  2632. 18
  2633. 18
  2634. 18
  2635. 18
  2636. 18
  2637. 18
  2638. 18
  2639. 18
  2640. 18
  2641. 18
  2642. 18
  2643. 18
  2644. 18
  2645. 18
  2646. 18
  2647. 18
  2648. 18
  2649. 18
  2650. 18
  2651. 18
  2652. 18
  2653. 18
  2654. 18
  2655. 18
  2656. 18
  2657. 18
  2658. 18
  2659. 18
  2660. 18
  2661. 18
  2662. 18
  2663. 18
  2664. 18
  2665. 18
  2666. 18
  2667. 18
  2668. 18
  2669. 18
  2670. 17
  2671. 17
  2672. 17
  2673. 17
  2674. 17
  2675. 17
  2676. 17
  2677. 17
  2678. 17
  2679. 17
  2680. 17
  2681. 17
  2682. 17
  2683. 17
  2684. 17
  2685. 17
  2686. 17
  2687. 17
  2688. 17
  2689. 17
  2690. 17
  2691. 17
  2692. 17
  2693. 17
  2694. 17
  2695. 17
  2696. 17
  2697. 17
  2698. 17
  2699. 17
  2700. 17
  2701. 17
  2702. 17
  2703. 17
  2704. 17
  2705. 17
  2706. 17
  2707. 17
  2708. 17
  2709. 17
  2710. 17
  2711. 17
  2712. 17
  2713. 17
  2714. 17
  2715. 17
  2716. 17
  2717. 17
  2718. 17
  2719. 17
  2720. 17
  2721. 17
  2722. 17
  2723. 17
  2724. 17
  2725. 17
  2726. 17
  2727. 17
  2728. 17
  2729. 17
  2730. 17
  2731. 17
  2732. 17
  2733. 17
  2734. 17
  2735. 17
  2736. 17
  2737. 17
  2738. 17
  2739. 17
  2740. 17
  2741. 17
  2742. 16
  2743. 16
  2744. 16
  2745. 16
  2746. 16
  2747. The problem lies in the voters as well. You have to be a party member, paying your dues, and take marching orders from their rich donors, or you are not a Democrat. Wait, what? If liberal Democrats truly care about pulling the American political system back from the right, they need to stop making excuses for their elected officials and realize they are simply not fighting for them. They are the ones who make the remark that Bernie's progressive policies are like a dream, but you would think they would rather have someone fight to get the best possible outcomes rather than handicapping themselves with "incremental change". Bernie's been saying the same things in Congress for decades for crying out loud. I am pretty sure Bernie would love his fight end in a dream come true. The worst part is how they allow Republicans to set the tone excusing Democrats for not being able to accomplish their goals. Progressive policies aren't possible because Republicans will obstruct, but of course they will! They are fighting for what their constituents and donors want and our Democratic officials need to do the same on their end with US being the people they listen to, but as long as the voters don't put their feet to the fire, they won't care. Obama needed to fight for the single payer option and not outright take it off the table as he did, and by doing so, he weaken his position in the negotiating table from the start! It's amazing how many Democrats don't see that stating "we have to be realistic" without noticing that that's not how you barter. You set the price you ultimately want and come down to what the buyer is willing to pay. Democrats are the worst negotiators in the world, but that's probably why many business owners are Republicans.
    16
  2748. 16
  2749. 16
  2750. 16
  2751. 16
  2752. 16
  2753. 16
  2754. 16
  2755. 16
  2756. 16
  2757. 16
  2758. 16
  2759. 16
  2760. 16
  2761. 16
  2762. 16
  2763. 16
  2764. 16
  2765. 16
  2766. 16
  2767. 16
  2768. 16
  2769. 16
  2770. 16
  2771. 16
  2772. 16
  2773. 16
  2774. 16
  2775. 16
  2776. 16
  2777. 16
  2778. 16
  2779. 16
  2780. 16
  2781. 16
  2782. 16
  2783. 16
  2784. 16
  2785. 16
  2786. 16
  2787. 16
  2788. 16
  2789. 16
  2790. 16
  2791. 16
  2792. 16
  2793. 16
  2794. 16
  2795. 16
  2796. 16
  2797. 16
  2798. 16
  2799. 16
  2800. 16
  2801. 16
  2802. 16
  2803. 16
  2804. 16
  2805. 16
  2806. 16
  2807. 16
  2808. 16
  2809. 16
  2810. 16
  2811. 16
  2812. 16
  2813. 15
  2814. 15
  2815. 15
  2816. 15
  2817. 15
  2818. 15
  2819. 15
  2820. 15
  2821. 15
  2822. 15
  2823. 15
  2824. 15
  2825. 15
  2826. 15
  2827. 15
  2828. 15
  2829. 15
  2830. 15
  2831. 15
  2832. 15
  2833. 15
  2834. 15
  2835. 15
  2836. 15
  2837. 15
  2838. 15
  2839. 15
  2840. 15
  2841. 15
  2842. 15
  2843. 15
  2844. 15
  2845. 15
  2846. 15
  2847. 15
  2848. 15
  2849. 15
  2850. 15
  2851. 15
  2852. 15
  2853. 15
  2854. 15
  2855. 15
  2856. 15
  2857. 15
  2858. 15
  2859. 15
  2860. 15
  2861. 15
  2862. 15
  2863. 15
  2864. 15
  2865. 15
  2866. 15
  2867. 15
  2868. 15
  2869. 15
  2870. 15
  2871. 15
  2872. 15
  2873. 15
  2874. 15
  2875. 15
  2876. 15
  2877. 15
  2878. 15
  2879. 15
  2880. 15
  2881. 14
  2882. 14
  2883. 14
  2884. 14
  2885. 14
  2886. 14
  2887. 14
  2888. 14
  2889. 14
  2890. 14
  2891. 14
  2892. 14
  2893. 14
  2894. 14
  2895. 14
  2896. 14
  2897. 14
  2898. 14
  2899. 14
  2900. 14
  2901. 14
  2902. 14
  2903. 14
  2904. 14
  2905. 14
  2906. 14
  2907. 14
  2908. 14
  2909. 14
  2910. 14
  2911. 14
  2912. 14
  2913. 14
  2914. 14
  2915. 14
  2916. 14
  2917. 14
  2918. 14
  2919. 14
  2920. 14
  2921. 14
  2922. 14
  2923. 14
  2924. 14
  2925. 14
  2926. 14
  2927. 14
  2928. 14
  2929. 14
  2930. 14
  2931. 14
  2932. 14
  2933. Jordan Peterson is eloquent and exhudes a certain charm that many of his young followers find very attactive. However, behind that layer, deep down, there is an intolerance and hatred that he rationalizes to himself and others as a righteous struggle against evil forces that would corrupt, enslave and destroy civilization, namely, Marxism and Postmodernism. However, he refuses to understand that Marxism and Postmodernism are complex, diverse historical movements in which many of their major thinkers often disagree with each other. He is very skillful at using logical fallacies, like strawman, false cause, red herring and unwarranted generalization. He seems to be almost a cult figure as exemplified by the vitriol that many of his followers throw at anyone who has the temerity to say anything critical of him. I wonder how many of his followers have read Karl Marx, Rosa Luxemburg, Antonio Gramsci, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Max Horkheimer, etc. Or when it comes to Postmodernism, how many of his followers have read Jaques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard, etc.? And not just read, but how many have honestly, with an open mind, tried to understand what these thinkers said? It's a lot easier to read some quick Wikipedia summaries and to believe that one has understood those thinkers, and then to believe Jordan Peterson's interpretation. What I find most disturbing in Jordan Peterson is his desire or need to impose on his students his own distorted interpretations. Sure, there is much to criticize in Marxism, Postmodernism and in what goes on in the culture today, but to demonize Marxism and Post-modernism and to want others to accept that demonization is not what an open minded, responsible educator does.
    14
  2934. Another sellout corporate Democrat that wants to appeal to the moderate base in the Republican Party. turn his back on the left Progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Ask Hillary Clinton how that strategy work for her. These Democrats care about one thing and that's corporations and rich people. we can all owe that to Bill Clinton because he turned the Democratic party into a party that sought all out the rich corporate interest and the elite billionaire donors to replace unions and workers as a source of money. They sold the Democratic Party to the rich people for price. Give us your billions and will do your bidding. to hell with the unions and The Working Man. All of the policies coming out of Clinton's Administration and Obama's administration have benefited for the larger degree the rich and the corporations. they refused hold the rich, Banks, and their corporations accountable for the crimes and in justices that they've done. they refused to free the American public from the grip of the military industrial complex that fills the coffers of these rich people and their corporations. NAFTA was a giveaway to the rich. The Affordable Care Act was a giveaway to the rich to the insurance companies. Obama made the Bush tax cuts permanent another big plus for the rich. Clinton deregulated the financial sector another big win for the rich. Bill Clinton decimated welfare. Obama didn't end the never ending wars in the Middle East that keep sucking money out government Treasury because these puppets are handpicked and groomed by the rich to deceive us that we are living in a democracy. They talk all these Grand lofty leftist ideals. They know the language well but they also know how to sell you on the line that my hands were tied. I had to reach across the aisle. better yet with Obama ,the obstruction argument, but Republicans could not obstruct him the first two years he had total control. neither bill or obama did anything to do away with right to work laws, which would be a big boost to unions. Neither bill or obama bring the minimum wage up to what it truly should be which is right around $21 an hour. Neither one of them did anything to fight the prison industrial complex that the rich and EnRich themselves off of. Bill Clinton's crime bill only made the prison industrial complex more potent. Obama didn't hold any of the bankers that caused the crash in 2008 accountable. Not a single CEO went to jail for all of the financial destruction they sowed. People lost their jobs. People lost their savings. People lost their homes. People lost their 401K retirement. some people lost their lives because they couldn't take the fact that he lost everything. some people committed suicide. some people lost all of the above, But the fat cats on Wall Street got richer and so has Obama. Obama has collected I think about $120 million dollars from the bankers since he left office. It's his back pay. The same way the clintons have collected their back pay for their faithful service to the rich and their corporations and Banks. Hope we can believe in? NOPE! Obama took hope and turned us all into DOPES. You can't even get them to stand for the fight for $15 min wage. However now that there's a Republican president and everything is controlled by Republicans they will pound their chest and make all these GRANDIOSE Progressive demands because they know they don't have the power to do it. if they ever do happen to get the power, they will be doing the same thing the Republicans are doing now with what they promised their base. They will be reneging and lying and backtracking and saying we can't do it. we don't really know what to do with how to start it or we don't have a plan to get it started. It is all an elaborate con game.
    14
  2935. 14
  2936. 14
  2937. 14
  2938. 14
  2939. 14
  2940. 14
  2941. 14
  2942. 14
  2943. 14
  2944. 14
  2945. 14
  2946. 14
  2947. 14
  2948. 14
  2949. 14
  2950. 14
  2951. 14
  2952. 14
  2953. 14
  2954. 14
  2955. 14
  2956. 14
  2957. 14
  2958. 13
  2959. 13
  2960. 13
  2961. 13
  2962. 13
  2963. 13
  2964. 13
  2965. 13
  2966. 13
  2967. 13
  2968. 13
  2969. 13
  2970. 13
  2971. 13
  2972. 13
  2973. 13
  2974. 13
  2975. 13
  2976. 13
  2977. 13
  2978. 13
  2979. 13
  2980. 13
  2981. 13
  2982. 13
  2983. 13
  2984. 13
  2985. 13
  2986. 13
  2987. 13
  2988. 13
  2989. 13
  2990. 13
  2991. 13
  2992. 13
  2993. 13
  2994. 13
  2995. 13
  2996. 13
  2997. 13
  2998. itsinmyvein - I'm having a lot of trouble understanding what you're saying in your post. At one point, you characterize different races as being different species. And you describe them as not being able to or not wanting to reproduce together. Neanderthals were a separate and distinct species from homo sapiens sapiens, but the two groups reproduced together. Not only that, they produced viable offspring, and there are many homo sapiens sapiens living today with Neanderthal genes. Then you started speaking of North Koreans being a separate and distinct race. There has only been a separation between North Korea and South Korea since 1945. My father is older than that. No new "race" was produced by making a geopolitical boundary 73 years ago. And then you claimed that Native Americans were a separate and distinct race, when they actually descended from populations in Asia and share many of the same genetic traits with those populations today. There was no genetic analysis, when Europeans first arrived that demonstrated that Native Americans were a separate and distinct race. I'm not sure why you identified yourself as a student of behavioral biology, either. If you understand the scientific method, you should know that it doesn't use appeals to authority. And, by your own claim, you're just a student anyway. And behavioral biology isn't the same thing as studying the genetic traits of various populations of humans (although, maybe you had some course that you think informs your positions). I could post sources to support my previous post, but that's not the subject of this video. In addition, I really don't care to fight that fight. Almost everyone has been socialized to believe that there are separate and distinct races of humans. To many people, it's a significant part of their sense of self. They want to believe that there are separate and distinct races of humans. And there is even a lot of race-based scientific research because almost all scientists have been socialized to believe that there are separate and distinct races of humans and there is a good deal of funding for such research. But none of it is scientifically valid because none of it uses discrete samples.
    13
  2999. 13
  3000. 13
  3001. 13
  3002. 13
  3003. 13
  3004. 13
  3005. 13
  3006. 13
  3007. 13
  3008. 13
  3009. 13
  3010. 13
  3011. 13
  3012. 13
  3013. 13
  3014. 13
  3015. 13
  3016. 13
  3017. 13
  3018. 13
  3019. 13
  3020. 13
  3021. 13
  3022. 13
  3023. 13
  3024. 13
  3025. 13
  3026. 13
  3027. 13
  3028. 13
  3029. 12
  3030. I totally agree with you, Mr National. I think the reason why this journalist thought she had Jeremy over a barrel is because in 1984 (when I was 15😯😯) the Northern Ireland peace talks were in complete disarray. Jeremy C had a large hand in negotiating the deal that eventually brought about peace. It was pure shit stirring on Sky's part, which is why I will not buy into their TV subscription service. Not only is it shit stirring, but it goes to show that there are no depths to which Murdoch's henchmen will stoop, no one's sensitivities they care about. It wouldn't matter to them if - as a result of their shit-stirring - troubles in N.I. Started again. As long as they could point their finger at the person they were attempting to destroy. If anything, I think Rational National does Sky News a favour by insinuating that one interviewer was at fault. It was the whole network, that's been out to destroy Jeremy Corbyn ever since he gained a position of power within the Labour Party. He is dangerous to Sky, because,it's largely owned by Rupert Murdoch who stands to have a much higher tax bill should Labour under JC ever take power. Tony Blair, the last labour leader who won an election here, was more right wing than even Margaret Thatcher was totally bought out by Murdoch - you scratch my back and I'll make sure my newspaper group will cover you favourably. Corbyn has more scruples than that. The fact that Sky won't ever come outright and ask, "Why do you want to raise taxes for the super-rich, thereby depriving Rupert Murdoch, our boss, of a few quid?" shows that they know how incorrect the question is. So they try to find something else to string him up with. It makes my blood boil.
    12
  3031. 12
  3032. 12
  3033. 12
  3034. 12
  3035. 12
  3036. 12
  3037. 12
  3038. 12
  3039. 12
  3040. 12
  3041. 12
  3042. 12
  3043. 12
  3044. 12
  3045. 12
  3046. 12
  3047. 12
  3048. 12
  3049. 12
  3050. 12
  3051. 12
  3052. 12
  3053. 12
  3054. 12
  3055. 12
  3056. 12
  3057. 12
  3058. 12
  3059. 12
  3060. 12
  3061. 12
  3062. 12
  3063. 12
  3064. 12
  3065. 12
  3066. 12
  3067. 12
  3068. 12
  3069. 12
  3070. 12
  3071. 12
  3072. 12
  3073. 12
  3074. 12
  3075. 12
  3076. 12
  3077. 12
  3078. 12
  3079. 12
  3080. 12
  3081. 12
  3082. 12
  3083. 12
  3084. 12
  3085. 12
  3086. 12
  3087. 12
  3088. 12
  3089. 12
  3090. 12
  3091. 12
  3092. 12
  3093. 12
  3094. 12
  3095. 12
  3096. 12
  3097. 12
  3098. 12
  3099. 12
  3100. 12
  3101. 12
  3102. 12
  3103. 12
  3104. 12
  3105. 12
  3106. 12
  3107. 12
  3108. 12
  3109. 12
  3110. 12
  3111. 12
  3112. 12
  3113. 12
  3114. 12
  3115. 12
  3116. 12
  3117. 12
  3118. 12
  3119. 12
  3120. 12
  3121. 12
  3122. 12
  3123. 12
  3124. 12
  3125. 12
  3126. 12
  3127. 12
  3128. 12
  3129. 12
  3130. 12
  3131. 12
  3132. 11
  3133. 11
  3134. 11
  3135. 11
  3136. 11
  3137. 11
  3138. 11
  3139. 11
  3140. 11
  3141. 11
  3142. 11
  3143. 11
  3144. 11
  3145. 11
  3146. 11
  3147. 11
  3148. 11
  3149. 11
  3150. 11
  3151. 11
  3152. 11
  3153. 11
  3154. 11
  3155. 11
  3156. 11
  3157. 11
  3158. 11
  3159. 11
  3160. 11
  3161. 11
  3162. 11
  3163. 11
  3164. 11
  3165. 11
  3166. 11
  3167. 11
  3168. 11
  3169. 11
  3170. 11
  3171. 11
  3172. 11
  3173. 11
  3174. 11
  3175. 11
  3176. 11
  3177. 11
  3178. 11
  3179. 11
  3180. 11
  3181. 11
  3182. 11
  3183. 11
  3184. 11
  3185. 11
  3186. 11
  3187. 11
  3188. 11
  3189. 11
  3190. 11
  3191. 11
  3192. 11
  3193. 11
  3194. 11
  3195. 11
  3196. 11
  3197. 11
  3198. 11
  3199. 11
  3200. 11
  3201. 11
  3202. 11
  3203. 11
  3204. 11
  3205. 11
  3206. 11
  3207. 11
  3208. 11
  3209. 11
  3210. 11
  3211. 11
  3212. 11
  3213. 11
  3214. 11
  3215. 11
  3216. 11
  3217. 11
  3218. 11
  3219. 11
  3220. 11
  3221. 11
  3222. 11
  3223. 11
  3224. 11
  3225. 11
  3226. 11
  3227. 11
  3228. 11
  3229. 11
  3230. 11
  3231. 11
  3232. 10
  3233. 10
  3234. 10
  3235. 10
  3236. 10
  3237. 10
  3238. 10
  3239. 10
  3240. 10
  3241. 10
  3242. 10
  3243. 10
  3244. 10
  3245. 10
  3246. 10
  3247. 10
  3248. 10
  3249. 10
  3250. 10
  3251. 10
  3252. 10
  3253. 10
  3254. 10
  3255. 10
  3256. 10
  3257. 10
  3258. 10
  3259. 10
  3260. 10
  3261. 10
  3262. 10
  3263. 10
  3264. 10
  3265. 10
  3266. 10
  3267. 10
  3268. 10
  3269. 10
  3270. 10
  3271. 10
  3272. 10
  3273. 10
  3274. 10
  3275. 10
  3276. 10
  3277. 10
  3278. 10
  3279. 10
  3280. 10
  3281. 10
  3282. 10
  3283. 10
  3284. 10
  3285. Now I know you're a Right wing boot licker ( undoubtedly hiding behind the infantile title of a "classic liberal") Re. your question ( that you added after the fact...another trait of the Right wing...subterfuge)...Trudeau is a conservative as he, and his Lib's, are Ā also into the maintenance of the economic status quo. Has Mr. Trudeau, and his Lib's, done anything re. the unsustainably low corporate tax rate?...Has Mr. Trudeau done anything about the massive public to private wealth transference ( see: Triple P's re. infrastructure)? Anything about wage stagnation?...Anything about Bill C-51 ( the surveillance state) other than renaming it?...Anything about electoral reform? Subsidies to profitable oil and gas corporations? I'll await your Albertan/rural Canadian response on those...The Lib's are Con's with a smile...They DO give the odd offset on social issues. This is what they use to differentiate themselves from the Con's ( like the corporate Democrats in the US). On economic matters, and that is where the rubber meets the proverbial road, I defy anyone to tell me the difference. Re. That you actually think the Nazi's were of "the Left"...Again,now I know you're a Right wing boot licker...I suppose you think that, because of the verbiage, East Germany was called the "Democratic Republic of Germany" and it was also a "democracy". I also assume the because of this that Eric Honecker , and his STASI< were staunch defenders of democracy?...And seeing as you're a fan of definitions and a fan of "running a country like a business", let's get one from the source and not Mr. Webster..."Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of the state and corporate power..."...Benito Mussolini...He was the co-author of the Fascist manifesto, by the way... The rest is a miss mash of Paul Joseph Watson/ Jordan Peterson pseudo intellectual drivel I'm not prepared to spend any time on...And my point stands... You're a Right wing boot licker,drunk on your own version of identity politics and economics, and The Rebel is where you belong..
    10
  3286. 10
  3287. 10
  3288. 10
  3289. 10
  3290. 10
  3291. 10
  3292. 10
  3293. 10
  3294. 10
  3295. 10
  3296. 10
  3297. 10
  3298. 10
  3299. 10
  3300. 10
  3301. 10
  3302. 10
  3303. 10
  3304. 10
  3305. 10
  3306. 10
  3307. 10
  3308. 10
  3309. 10
  3310. 10
  3311. 10
  3312. 10
  3313. 10
  3314. 10
  3315. 10
  3316. 10
  3317. 10
  3318. 10
  3319. 10
  3320. 10
  3321. 10
  3322. 10
  3323. 10
  3324. 10
  3325. 10
  3326. 10
  3327. 10
  3328. 10
  3329. 10
  3330. 10
  3331. 10
  3332. 10
  3333. 10
  3334. 10
  3335. 9
  3336. 9
  3337. 9
  3338. 9
  3339. 9
  3340. 9
  3341. 9
  3342. 9
  3343. 9
  3344. 9
  3345. 9
  3346. As a Quebecer, I've got a couple of things to say. First of, let's note that the Quebec's liberal party is the right wing party in the assembly, let's not fool ourselves. Secondly, this is important to note tant a couple of years back the Parti QuƩbƩcois tried to ban all visible religious symbols for public employees, not reciepients, which actually would be king of secular, I think it's unessessary, but as a quebecer I know how people hate religion here, not just ''other religions'', all of them, so I get where the sentiment comes from. What the liberals tried here is to implement religious neutrality, not the saparation of church and stat, but neutrality which is different. They tried to end the debate but haven't because their law is really dum. You gotta understand, with winter, it is sometimes a necessity to have your face covered in quebec, believe me. This is now a law that can be implemented, it's realy dumb. thirdly, it is interesting that the Liberals did this because they are the party taht most imigrants vote for, and they usually feel targeted by those mesures. The liberal party isn't a xenophobic party overall, they just wanted to close a debate but ended with a dumb law. Finally, it is very very important to understand the views people have of religion in quebec. Recently I saw a poll stating that only 34% of people believed in God, that's realy fucking low. The catholic church fucked us up so bad we ended up hating every thing reminding us of religious control of people. This anti-religious symbol sentiment is not all racism and xenephobia, English Canada tend to judge us very rapidly without trying to understand our history and culture and it gets really fucking frusfrating. And btw, for fucks sake, take the old fucking crucifix down my assembly.
    9
  3347. 9
  3348. 9
  3349. 9
  3350. 9
  3351. 9
  3352. 9
  3353. 9
  3354. 9
  3355. 9
  3356. 9
  3357. 9
  3358. I really appreciated what Mr. Roland Martin explained - and when he stated "there is a big difference between His-Story and History! So aptly put! I am a 71 year old Canadian - who - just a few years ago, learned what was done to OUR Indigenous peoples when a Tuberculosis Epidemic began to decimate their population - our Government at the time, did basically NOTHING about this - because it was assumed only our Indigenous population was affected, so what the hell, let 'em die off! However, WHEN this terrible disease ALSO began affecting so-called White people - well then, MY GOD, the Canadian Govt. at the time "We have to DO something"! They then made sure the Indigenous people had their own hospitals - the whites had THEIR own hospitals! When it was discovered that a certain experimental surgery, which entailed the removal of a rib - DID NOT work - Doctors stopped doing this to patients in the so-called White Hospitals within 6 months! In the Indigenous hospitals - this failed experiment was STILL PRACTICED for THREE YEARS!!! THIS is why, to this day, you can still see some Indigenous Elders who were subjected to this disgusting practice - they appear slumped or not fully upright. I WAS NEVER TAUGHT THIS HISTORY IN SCHOOL! WHY NOT!!!! I am SURE no one is taught THIS or any other UGLY CRAP our Canadian Government has practiced -- anywhere in my country. WHY NOT!!! THIS IS PART OF OUR HISTORY - instead we are taught his-story or their story! This is DISGUSTING!!! How can ANY COUNTRY learn, grow, and advance toward a more peaceful, respectful understand of so-called "others" and become truly ONE, as a nation, as a global entity, as anything humane - IF WE ARE NOT TAUGHT THE FAILINGS OF OUR OWN GOVERNMENTS!!! PEOPLE EVERYWHERE, whatever our nationality - learn from our mistakes - not our successes! I am FURIOUS at my Canadian education - and at ANY country's educational system that does NOT teach TRUTH! TRUTH IS POWER!!! I want TRUE HISTORY taught in every single one of our schools - right across Canada - THE above and every other UGLY Piece of History is our RIGHT TO KNOW as citizens of our country! TRUE HISTORY - NOT HIS-STORY.
    9
  3359. 9
  3360. 9
  3361. 9
  3362. 9
  3363. 9
  3364. 9
  3365. 9
  3366. 9
  3367. 9
  3368. 9
  3369. 9
  3370. 9
  3371. 9
  3372. 9
  3373. 9
  3374. 9
  3375. 9
  3376. 9
  3377. 9
  3378. 9
  3379. 9
  3380. 9
  3381. 9
  3382. 9
  3383. 9
  3384. 9
  3385. 9
  3386. 9
  3387. 9
  3388. 9
  3389. 9
  3390. 9
  3391. 9
  3392. 9
  3393. 9
  3394. 9
  3395. 9
  3396. 9
  3397. 9
  3398. 9
  3399. 9
  3400. 9
  3401. 9
  3402. 9
  3403. 9
  3404. 9
  3405. 9
  3406. 9
  3407. 9
  3408. 9
  3409. 9
  3410. 9
  3411. 9
  3412. 9
  3413. 9
  3414. 9
  3415. 9
  3416. 9
  3417. 9
  3418. 9
  3419. 9
  3420. 9
  3421. 9
  3422. 9
  3423. 9
  3424. 9
  3425. 9
  3426. 9
  3427. 9
  3428. Interesting that the downvotes actually don't have many arguments. Two thoughts. 1. On the video itself. The current internet-obsession with "principles" lacks any understanding of nuance or the word "principle" itself. To most so-called free-speech advocates: all speech is equal, all speech should be encouraged, and all speech should be represented in the mainstream. I really appreciated your breakdown of this issue because you hit back against the idea that if one supports free speech, one must also support the subsidization and propagation of that speech or they are unprincipled. This is a false dichotomy and a ridiculous idea in general. 1a. It's very difficult to have this discussion in this manner without appearing to be an apologist for one's own side while condemning the same behaviour of the opposite. While I think you did well, this is a point We - as in The Left, broadly - must make often and must support with as much evidence as possible, logical and experiential. I've been thinking of it in terms of a logical syllogism, which would be ideal, but I have not yet found the simple, decisive, convincing argument I'm striving for. By what method can We achieve this in the same way the absolutists achieve have? 1b. Maher actually is being principled - if his position is that all speech among public figures should be debated, discussed, and criticised without fear of such significant harm to their private life. Just as you are being principled in your own position. He's certainly incorrect on the bullying part, though. 2. The best counterargument against the boycott, in my estimation, is that no mob-mentality should be encouraged in any charged issue, especially when it comes to one's career and health (losing one's job and experiencing public evisceration is certainly not good for one's health). While I may be in favour of certain results, I actually do disagree with the method Mr. Hogg is using to achieve his desired outcome. The Center and the Left are coming together to boycott Laura Ingraham, but what will happen if the Center and the Right come together against a socialist, communist, or "social justice warrior?" This is not a slippery-slope, it is a reasonable comparison, and I believe the result will be the same. Such extreme tactics should never be employed against one's enemies if they do not wish to experience the same in response. Nor should they prod a hungry wolf. Further, Mr. Hogg appears to be advocating boycott of Ms. Ingraham largely in response to her unprofessional criticism of his private life, not due to the views you allege. In my opinion this is a significant tactical flaw, as it allows those broadly concerned with the tenor of political debate to criticise Hogg's escalation of the situation, rather than engaging with the substance of any argument against her show. Thus, I do hope that Hogg and others learn from this and their next target is properly deconstructed, as Nathan Robinson so expertly did in his article on Ben Shapiro ("The Cool Kid's Philosopher"). Great video as always, David! Cheers
    9
  3429. 9
  3430. 9
  3431. 9
  3432. 9
  3433. 9
  3434. 9
  3435. 9
  3436. 9
  3437. 9
  3438. 9
  3439. 9
  3440. 9
  3441. 9
  3442. 9
  3443. 9
  3444. 9
  3445. 8
  3446. 8
  3447. 8
  3448. 8
  3449. 8
  3450. 8
  3451. 8
  3452. 8
  3453. 8
  3454. 8
  3455. 8
  3456. 8
  3457. 8
  3458. 8
  3459. 8
  3460. 8
  3461. 8
  3462. 8
  3463. 8
  3464. 8
  3465. 8
  3466. 8
  3467. 8
  3468. 8
  3469. 8
  3470. 8
  3471. 8
  3472. 8
  3473. 8
  3474. 8
  3475. 8
  3476. 8
  3477. 8
  3478. 8
  3479. 8
  3480. 8
  3481. 8
  3482. 8
  3483. 8
  3484. 8
  3485. 8
  3486. 8
  3487. 8
  3488. 8
  3489. 8
  3490. 8
  3491. 8
  3492. 8
  3493. 8
  3494. 8
  3495. 8
  3496. 8
  3497. 8
  3498. 8
  3499. 8
  3500. 8
  3501. 8
  3502. 8
  3503. 8
  3504. 8
  3505. 8
  3506. 8
  3507. 8
  3508. 8
  3509. 8
  3510. 8
  3511. 8
  3512. 8
  3513. 8
  3514. 8
  3515. 8
  3516. 8
  3517. 8
  3518. 8
  3519. 8
  3520. 8
  3521. 8
  3522. 8
  3523. 8
  3524. 8
  3525. 8
  3526. 8
  3527. 8
  3528. 8
  3529. 8
  3530. 8
  3531. 8
  3532. 8
  3533. 8
  3534. 8
  3535. 8
  3536. 8
  3537. 8
  3538. 8
  3539. 8
  3540. 8
  3541. 8
  3542. 8
  3543. 8
  3544. 8
  3545. 8
  3546. 8
  3547. 8
  3548. 8
  3549. 8
  3550. 8
  3551. 8
  3552. 8
  3553. 8
  3554. 8
  3555. 8
  3556. 8
  3557. 8
  3558. 8
  3559. 8
  3560. 8
  3561. 8
  3562. 8
  3563. 8
  3564. 8
  3565. 8
  3566. 8
  3567. 7
  3568. 7
  3569. 7
  3570. 7
  3571. 7
  3572. 7
  3573. 7
  3574. 7
  3575. 7
  3576. 7
  3577. 7
  3578. 7
  3579. 7
  3580. 7
  3581. 7
  3582. 7
  3583. 7
  3584. 7
  3585. Things we could do immediately are decriminalize, then legalize (and regulate) all naturally occurring drugs. But even before we did that, we could make these drugs readily available to people. People hooked on opioids and other drugs could go to "drug dispensing centers" and get a minimum amount of the drug on which they are addicted. This would cause the demand for drugs - from cartels - to DROP! Addicts would no longer have to engage in illegal, immoral or criminal behaviors to get these drugs. By getting a minimum amount of the drug on which they are addicted, they could be STABILIZED!! And during this period of stabilization, outreach workers could meet with them and find out what THEY want and need for themselves and their lives. They would NOT be treated as if they were damaged, flawed or BAD! The problem with so many countries - and the USA is one of the worst - is in the way we approach mind-altering substances in the first place. Our country sends out very mixed messages about them. On the one hand, alcohol, cigarettes and caffeine are legal. All three of these substances can - and do - lead to death in the people who use them. On the other hand, drugs like marijuana, amphetamines and heroin are illegal. Why do we legalize some - but not the other - drugs? Much of it depends upon who is using them. Cocaine was legal in this country back in the 1920's. It wasn't until People of Color and members of other minority groups started using them (and this became known to government officials) that the government decided to make them ILLEGAL!! In essence, our government used the legal system as a means to punish members of minority communities. And once they did this, they could have police pick them up and charge them with a crime for using substances. Once charged, they could throw the book at them and put them in prisons and jails. Once imprisoned, they could use the inmates for slave labor for a variety of companies and jobs. A lesser-known motivation for charging and imprisoning People of Color was to turn them back into slaves. A whole lot of people were not happy when People of Color were freed from slavery. THIS was one, very effective strategy these folks could use to, in essence, engage in slavery practices but NOT have it called slavery.
    7
  3586. 7
  3587. 7
  3588. 7
  3589. 7
  3590. 7
  3591. 7
  3592. 7
  3593. 7
  3594. 7
  3595. 7
  3596. 7
  3597. 7
  3598. 7
  3599. 7
  3600. 7
  3601. 7
  3602. 7
  3603. 7
  3604. 7
  3605. 7
  3606. 7
  3607. 7
  3608. 7
  3609. 7
  3610. 7
  3611. 7
  3612. 7
  3613. 7
  3614. 7
  3615. 7
  3616. 7
  3617. 7
  3618. 7
  3619. 7
  3620. 7
  3621. 7
  3622. 7
  3623. 7
  3624. 7
  3625. 7
  3626. 7
  3627. 7
  3628. 7
  3629. 7
  3630. 7
  3631. 7
  3632. 7
  3633. 7
  3634. 7
  3635. 7
  3636. 7
  3637. 7
  3638. 7
  3639. 7
  3640. 7
  3641. 7
  3642. 7
  3643. 7
  3644. 7
  3645. 7
  3646. 7
  3647. 7
  3648. 7
  3649. 7
  3650. 7
  3651. 7
  3652. 7
  3653. 7
  3654. 7
  3655. 7
  3656. 7
  3657. 7
  3658. 7
  3659. 7
  3660. 7
  3661. 7
  3662. 7
  3663. 7
  3664. 7
  3665. 7
  3666. 7
  3667. 7
  3668. 7
  3669. 7
  3670. 7
  3671. 7
  3672. 7
  3673. 7
  3674. 7
  3675. 7
  3676. 7
  3677. 7
  3678. 7
  3679. 7
  3680. 7
  3681. 7
  3682. 7
  3683. 7
  3684. 7
  3685. 7
  3686. 7
  3687. 7
  3688. 7
  3689. 7
  3690. 7
  3691. 7
  3692. 7
  3693. 7
  3694. 7
  3695. 7
  3696. 7
  3697. 7
  3698. 7
  3699. 7
  3700. 7
  3701. 7
  3702. 7
  3703. 7
  3704. 7
  3705. 7
  3706. 7
  3707. 7
  3708. 7
  3709. 7
  3710. 6
  3711. 6
  3712. 6
  3713. 6
  3714. 6
  3715. This news story is like so many news stories that the media uses to control public sentiment and public opinion. In 2010 Barack Obama authorized the assassination of an American citizen, in Yemen. This citizen wasn't charged, or convicted of any crime. This goes against US law and policy. The administration was sued by the ACLU but nothing came of it, the issue was a minor talking point in the 2012 election. There are laws and protections that are supposed to prevent the government from illegally entering your home, seizing you property, and imprisoning ANYONE of us without just cause, much less terminating a human life. Omar Khadr is a born Canadian citizen. Like every other individual on this planet, he has the right to his beliefs, religion and to pursue those beliefs as long as they don't infringe on anyone else's rights and freedom. The Iraq war and every other war since which the US has spearheaded in that region has never been supported by any Canadian Prime Minister, except the Conservatives under Stephen Harper. While I might not agree with what Omar Khadr did in going to war, regardless of which side, he is entitled to follow his conscience and his God. After being captured as a child soldier he was taken to Guantanamo, tortured denied his basic human rights, and left without the protection of every Canadian citizen, which is guaranteed by our "Charter of Rights and Freedoms" because of his beliefs, and the side he chose to support. The Stephen Harper government basically left this child to die. If this was a child captured by the Germans in WW2, and the possibility to return this child to his homeland presented itself, it would have been done without a second thought. The Honourable Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did the right thing in acknowledging and righting the abuse of a Canadian citizen. He made sure the laws and rules of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms are applied to every citizen, and it isn't determined by your religion, your ethnicity, or any other affiliation, than you are a Canadian citizen. I don't believe in, or support wars, but the media which is controlled by entities who feel it is appropriate to take away peoples rights in the court of public opinion and have their causes supported as wrong as they may be, needs to be addressed.
    6
  3716. 6
  3717. 6
  3718. 6
  3719. 6
  3720. 6
  3721. 6
  3722. 6
  3723. 6
  3724. 6
  3725. 6
  3726. 6
  3727. 6
  3728. 6
  3729. 6
  3730. 6
  3731. 6
  3732. 6
  3733. 6
  3734. 6
  3735. 6
  3736. 6
  3737. 6
  3738. 6
  3739. Dyson did a great job here in the debate. No one is brave enough to call this pseudointellectual out on his bullshit. JPs argument about "what percentage" is ridiculous. It's akin to saying, "How much black paint do I have to apply to my face before it becomes black face? Does a dot count?" It's a mindless retort, and completely obfuscates the simple realities of race relations in the US. Privilege is obvious to anyone who has any sense of how the world works. I have had a tough life. And yet, I understand that my personal circumstances in life would be even harder had I possessed melanin in my skin. I wouldn't retort by saying, as Peterson has, "you know nothing about me or my background!". It sounds so childish, and intellectually dishonest. How is this so difficult to understand? You have to be oblivious not to notice. It's no wonder why Dyson exploded as he did. Although, his explosion was precise and cutting. So you have two options, either blacks are genetically inferior and that's why they suffer. Or, everyone is pretty much the same, we are all the same species, but some struggle more than others for psychosocial reasons. Since race is meaningless in the study of anthropology, since there is more genetic differences within a racial group than opposing racial groups, the answer is clearly the psychosocial option. Identical twins given to poor and rich foster homes had different IQ scores; The twin living in the rich household had 10 IQ points higher than the twin raised poor. We know how IQ is affected by environment. It's why no scientist would claim that IQ is only a genetic factor but of various factors. Btw, when is JP going to that church with Dyson?
    6
  3740. 6
  3741. 6
  3742. 6
  3743. 6
  3744. 6
  3745. 6
  3746. 6
  3747. 6
  3748. 6
  3749. 6
  3750. 6
  3751. 6
  3752. 6
  3753. 6
  3754. 6
  3755. 6
  3756. 6
  3757. 6
  3758. 6
  3759. 6
  3760. 6
  3761. 6
  3762. 6
  3763. 6
  3764. 6
  3765. 6
  3766. 6
  3767. 6
  3768. 6
  3769. 6
  3770. 6
  3771. 6
  3772. 6
  3773. 6
  3774. 6
  3775. 6
  3776. 6
  3777. 6
  3778. 6
  3779. 6
  3780. 6
  3781. 6
  3782. 6
  3783. 6
  3784. 6
  3785. 6
  3786. 6
  3787. 6
  3788. 6
  3789. 6
  3790. 6
  3791. 6
  3792. 6
  3793. 6
  3794. 6
  3795. 6
  3796. 6
  3797. 6
  3798. 6
  3799. 6
  3800. 6
  3801. 6
  3802. 6
  3803. 6
  3804. 6
  3805. 6
  3806. 6
  3807. 6
  3808. 6
  3809. 6
  3810. 6
  3811. 6
  3812. 6
  3813. 6
  3814. 6
  3815. 6
  3816. 6
  3817. 6
  3818. 6
  3819. 6
  3820. 6
  3821. 6
  3822. 6
  3823. 6
  3824. 6
  3825. 6
  3826. 6
  3827. 6
  3828. 6
  3829. 6
  3830. 6
  3831. 6
  3832. 6
  3833. 6
  3834. 6
  3835. 6
  3836. 6
  3837. 6
  3838. 6
  3839. 6
  3840. 6
  3841. 6
  3842. 6
  3843. 6
  3844. 6
  3845. 6
  3846. 6
  3847. 6
  3848. 6
  3849. 6
  3850. 6
  3851. 6
  3852. 6
  3853. 6
  3854. 6
  3855. 6
  3856. 6
  3857. +Furious Styles -- where's your data on this issue? I found one that studied 20+ years worth of data, and they came to the conclusion of "no". Here you go, the consensus report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine for 2017; https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23550/the-economic-and-fiscal-consequences-of-immigration In it they state that "the Economic and Fiscal Consequences of Immigration finds that the long-term impact of immigration on the wages and employment of native-born workers overall is very small, and that any negative impacts are most likely to be found for prior immigrants or native-born high school dropouts. First-generation immigrants are more costly to governments than are the native-born, but the second generation are among the strongest fiscal and economic contributors in the U.S. This report concludes that immigration has an overall positive impact on long-run economic growth in the U.S." The immigration policy has absolutely nothing to do with living wage increases; wages have been stagnant for decades, and the lack of regulation on the issue is what lead to the drastically shitty decline this country has been in. That problem has been around waaaaaaaaay before DACA, and way before any significant influx of immigrants. Besides that, I find it odd how on the one hand folks say immigrants hurt wages for the working poor, yet simultaneously fight against any effort to raise the wages of said working poor. Priorities in this country are out of wack.
    6
  3858. 6
  3859. 6
  3860. 6
  3861. 6
  3862. 6
  3863. 6
  3864. 6
  3865. 6
  3866. 5
  3867. 5
  3868. 5
  3869. 5
  3870. 5
  3871. 5
  3872. 5
  3873. 5
  3874. 5
  3875. 5
  3876. 5
  3877. 5
  3878. 5
  3879. 5
  3880. 5
  3881. 5
  3882. 5
  3883. 5
  3884. 5
  3885. 5
  3886. 5
  3887. 5
  3888. 5
  3889. 5
  3890. 5
  3891. 5
  3892. 5
  3893. 5
  3894. 5
  3895. 5
  3896. 5
  3897. 5
  3898. 5
  3899. 5
  3900. 5
  3901. 5
  3902. 5
  3903. 5
  3904. 5
  3905. 5
  3906. 5
  3907. 5
  3908. 5
  3909. 5
  3910. 5
  3911. 5
  3912. 5
  3913. 5
  3914. 5
  3915. 5
  3916. 5
  3917. 5
  3918. 5
  3919. 5
  3920. 5
  3921. 5
  3922. 5
  3923. 5
  3924. 5
  3925. 5
  3926. 5
  3927. 5
  3928. 5
  3929. 5
  3930. 5
  3931. 5
  3932. 5
  3933. 5
  3934. 5
  3935. 5
  3936. 5
  3937. 5
  3938. 5
  3939. 5
  3940. 5
  3941. 5
  3942. 5
  3943. 5
  3944. 5
  3945. 5
  3946. 5
  3947. 5
  3948. 5
  3949. 5
  3950. 5
  3951. 5
  3952. 5
  3953. 5
  3954. 5
  3955. 5
  3956. 5
  3957. 5
  3958. 5
  3959. 5
  3960. 5
  3961. 5
  3962. 5
  3963. 5
  3964. 5
  3965. 5
  3966. 5
  3967. 5
  3968. 5
  3969. 5
  3970. 5
  3971. 5
  3972. 5
  3973. 5
  3974. 5
  3975. 5
  3976. I think we are having a big problem with the caveats employers seem to be taking advantage of between hiring fulltime employees versus part-time employees, with the latter being cheaper for them. PT or contract employees do not have the same entitlements or benefits as fulltime employees, it is much easier to terminate them, and employees do not have to guarantee 40 hours of work per week. PT employees can also be paid much less than fulltime employees by considering them as "entry level", which is not clearly defined. Unions have been declining when we really need them, people think dues are a reason to not have a union, but they will fight for you and protect you. It's worth it to have their expertise and knowledge on your side. We need some form of regulation for PT & FT, with a minimum requirement of FT employees based upon a complex consideration of company size and business levels etc. Or to require that only actual entry level positions are paid minimum wage, with wages increasing with seniority/responsibilities/education etc. FT is only described as "35-40 hr/wk". Most people are being grossly underpaid, and no one who works should be under the poverty level, or struggling to make ends meet. Often employers offer extra hours, so you end up working 40 hours, but your schedule is only 25. All the FT with none of the benefits. We need better wages and better management of tax dollars. That would make a huge difference in our quality of life. $15/hr is great for minimum wage, but any job that isn't entry level should be paid more than that, we shouldn't all be paid the minimum simply because companies want to pocket more money. It's disgraceful mistreatment of the people they rely on to make the company profitable in the first place. * Edit, that job loss myth doesn't take jobs created into account either.
    5
  3977. 5
  3978. 5
  3979. 5
  3980. 5
  3981. 5
  3982. 5
  3983. 5
  3984. 5
  3985. 5
  3986. 5
  3987. 5
  3988. 5
  3989. Right on. I just wrote about the Alabama election and we’re in total agreement. Doug Jones won in large part because of the African-American vote on Tuesday, Dec. 12, 2017. He also won because Roy Moore was a horrible candidate who drove enough people to vote for Jones or write in another candidate. If not for the allegations, Moore’s nutty self could have easily won. Sadly, the Democratic establishment will take all the wrong lessons from this. They believe that centrism is the answer but it is the scourge of the Democratic Party. It’s a huge reason why many people lost their safety net during the Clinton years it and it is part of the reason the party is decimated across the country. Also, centrism signals the Democrats’ capitulation to the Republicans. Centrists do not make good candidates, but populists do. Again, Jones won due to extenuating circumstances. Jones only won by a point and he didn’t even win half the vote. There was a perfect storm created in the aftermath of the Harvey Weinstein revelations and the amount of fail on the Republican side. Democrats would do well to take care of the people who really make up their base and stop with this cutesy centrist BS. BTW, I love seeing the amount of research you do for your videos. Here’s the post I wrote for anyone who’s interested: https://shmaltzandmenudo.wordpress.com/2017/12/13/if-you-told-me-that-alabama-could-turn-blue/ I made it scannable for the most part, but the best sections are at the end.
    5
  3990. 5
  3991. 5
  3992. 5
  3993. 5
  3994. 5
  3995. 5
  3996. 5
  3997. 5
  3998. 5
  3999. 5
  4000. 5
  4001. 5
  4002. 5
  4003. 5
  4004. 5
  4005. 5
  4006. 5
  4007. 5
  4008. 5
  4009. 5
  4010. 5
  4011. 5
  4012. 5
  4013. 5
  4014. 5
  4015. 5
  4016. 5
  4017. 5
  4018. 5
  4019. 5
  4020. 5
  4021. 5
  4022. 5
  4023. 5
  4024. 5
  4025. 5
  4026. 5
  4027. 5
  4028. 5
  4029. 5
  4030. 5
  4031. 5
  4032. 5
  4033. 5
  4034. 5
  4035. 5
  4036. 5
  4037. 5
  4038. 5
  4039. 5
  4040. 5
  4041. 5
  4042. 5
  4043. 5
  4044. 5
  4045. 5
  4046. 5
  4047. 5
  4048. 5
  4049. 5
  4050. 5
  4051. 5
  4052. 5
  4053. 5
  4054. 5
  4055. 5
  4056. 5
  4057. 5
  4058. 5
  4059. 5
  4060. 5
  4061. 5
  4062. 5
  4063. 5
  4064. 5
  4065. 5
  4066. 5
  4067. 5
  4068. 5
  4069. 5
  4070. 5
  4071. 4
  4072. 4
  4073. 4
  4074. 4
  4075. 4
  4076. 4
  4077. 4
  4078. 4
  4079. 4
  4080. 4
  4081. 4
  4082. 4
  4083. 4
  4084. 4
  4085. 4
  4086. 4
  4087. 4
  4088. 4
  4089. 4
  4090. 4
  4091. 4
  4092. 4
  4093. 4
  4094. 4
  4095. 4
  4096. 4
  4097. 4
  4098. 4
  4099. 4
  4100. 4
  4101. 4
  4102. 4
  4103. 4
  4104. 4
  4105. 4
  4106. 4
  4107. 4
  4108. 4
  4109. 4
  4110. 4
  4111. 4
  4112. 4
  4113. 4
  4114. 4
  4115. 4
  4116. 4
  4117. 4
  4118. 4
  4119. 4
  4120. 4
  4121. 4
  4122. 4
  4123. 4
  4124. 4
  4125. 4
  4126. 4
  4127. 4
  4128. 4
  4129. 4
  4130. 4
  4131. 4
  4132. 4
  4133. 4
  4134. 4
  4135. 4
  4136. 4
  4137. 4
  4138. 4
  4139. 4
  4140. 4
  4141. 4
  4142. 4
  4143. 4
  4144. 4
  4145. 4
  4146. 4
  4147. 4
  4148. 4
  4149. 4
  4150. 4
  4151. 4
  4152. 4
  4153. 4
  4154. 4
  4155. 4
  4156. 4
  4157. 4
  4158. 4
  4159. 4
  4160. 4
  4161. 4
  4162. 4
  4163. 4
  4164. 4
  4165. 4
  4166. 4
  4167. 4
  4168. 4
  4169. 4
  4170. 4
  4171. 4
  4172. 4
  4173. 4
  4174. 4
  4175. 4
  4176. 4
  4177. 4
  4178. 4
  4179. 4
  4180. 4
  4181. 4
  4182. 4
  4183. 4
  4184. 4
  4185. 4
  4186. 4
  4187. 4
  4188. 4
  4189. 4
  4190. 4
  4191. 4
  4192. 4
  4193. 4
  4194. 4
  4195. 4
  4196. 4
  4197. 4
  4198. 4
  4199. 4
  4200. 4
  4201. 4
  4202. 4
  4203. 4
  4204. 4
  4205. 4
  4206. 4
  4207. 4
  4208. 4
  4209. 4
  4210. 4
  4211. 4
  4212. 4
  4213. 4
  4214. 4
  4215. 4
  4216. 4
  4217. 4
  4218. 4
  4219. 4
  4220. 4
  4221. 4
  4222. 4
  4223. 4
  4224. 4
  4225. 4
  4226. 4
  4227. 4
  4228. 4
  4229. 4
  4230. 4
  4231. 4
  4232. 4
  4233. 4
  4234. 4
  4235. 4
  4236. 4
  4237. 4
  4238. 4
  4239. 4
  4240. Not trying to be a douche but how much does it cost to put up a channel like yours ? I love what you do but basically you're just giving your insights and opinions on topics of the day. Same as I am doing. Yes I know you put a lot of time into it. I put a lot of time into trying to educate myself on what's going on in our government and economic policies. I think you will get enough support to keep doing what you are passionate about. As do I but I don't do it because I think that's my ticket to riches. Much like authors if what you say is of enough interest then people will pay to hear what you have to say. Don't get me wrong, it sucks that Google/ YouTube has to try and squash public discourse but they aren't banning you. Just cutting off your purse strings. Thereby discouraging those like you from making this your life's work. Keep doing what you're doing. You are building your brand. Explore other avenues of revenue. Maybe you won't get rich but you'll never work a day in your life if you truly love what you do. You are very good @ what you do. You'll get by until we get another way to be compensated by another medium provider. Every band wants to be a rock star but not everyone gets to reach that level. But the true lovers & artists keep doing what makes their life fulfilled at whatever level they can keep doing it. Like Debbie Lusignan, Tim Black, etc... you have a following that will support you. I don't believe it's about the money for you so don't make it about the money. Do what you love, it comes through. When people see that they'll come through for you. Best of luck , I will support you in your endeavors because you do the community a noble service.
    4
  4241. 4
  4242. 4
  4243. 4
  4244. 4
  4245. 4
  4246. 4
  4247. 4
  4248. 4
  4249. 4
  4250. 4
  4251. 4
  4252. 4
  4253. 4
  4254. 4
  4255. I have an idea on rebuilding Puerto Rico, our inner cites and blighted industrial towns leveraging Bernie's plan. I am a Bernie Bro but admit I was unaware he had a similar plan. Here's the deal called Inside Out and Bottoms Up Infrastructure Renewal: 1. Inside out is the rule that says the majority of the labor force, the guys with the picks the shovels, the jack hammer, the labor must come from the unemployed native inhabitant (whether the island or the inner city or WV coal town or my home town, Chester PA). Inside out also means the white collar work, the financial planning, the civil engineering, the urban planning, including multi-purpose neighborhoods, architecture, hybrid renewable power grid and seeding the ability for sustained industrial capacity (jobs), are done by students, interns, grads, and post grads who come form the communities effect. This means HBCU, Puerto Rican schools, Community colleges, local state school, and native graduates. The skin in the game is brown, black and white skin, aligned to the neighborhood or community. This ensure a major chunk of the money is spent on blue and white collar labor from the inside out. An outside in imports labor from outside the community. There is little to no distribution of earnings to benefit the community. There is little to no lasting benefit to locals either. Their pride, like the air, is sucked out of the people. They sit, like animals in the zoo, withing for their cagfe to be cleaned and some food and water left in the dark corner. 2. Bottoms up - The companies who lead the redevelopment, or reconstruction, or resurrection (pick a word) effort are small banks, and small businesses. These business must lead the financial and infrastructure planning but must hire from the inside out through apprenticeships and subcontract to start up cooperatives (employee-owned small businesses, professional and manual labor. Doing so ensure the proper distribution of funds throughout the work force, and a focus on the objective, rebuilding for the present and future well being of the inhabitants. At the same time, you have funded a job and skills training program, where workers learn a trade, like masonry, carpentry, even modern alternative energy skills. You have also taken the folks form the towns an villages who went to school an placed them next to savvy, more senior business and professional people where they learn real-world business, social, technical, and engineering, panning, manufacturing and lifecycle skills. A Top Down methodology begins with the largest investment banks, largest engineering firms, and the largest city planners and real estate developers. They all will take a significant cut of the funding for high salaries, bonuses, befits and other remuneration. Their work will not employ indigenous people, but the haute classe, from the blue blooded universities, and privileged classes. Their objective will be the highest return on their investments by taking the grant money and putting it to work to gentrify the area, creating office space, apartments and town houses to be filled by the rich, many foreign (international) wealthy. I don't have time to go on. I am a slow typist and as you can see make a lot of mistakes. But eh idea of an inside out and top down is the best way to create more jobs for more Americans that resurrects our fallen, blighted communities, incorporates the latest in alternative energy generation, the best ideas in urban planning, and plants the seeds for renewed growth in our industrial capacity. This reduced poverty and crime, provides good work for our under and unemployed, for our kids coming out of college, for small businesses, regional banks and local governments. I realize I under-expressed the need to pull in manufacturing companies into the master plan, but you get the idea. It would be damn sad if Goldman Sachs and Halliburton get the contract to rebuild Puerto Rico or any place. Thanks .
    4
  4256. What a conceited, selfish prick. Not everyone wants to be a billionaire, you know. It's not "aspirational" for me to be like this greedy, out-of-touch, vapid loser who thinks there's nothing more to life than hoarding money, than conspicuously gorging himself at a lavish banquet right in the middle of a widespread famine while the planet boils and multiple species are going extinct at an alarming rate. My own fiscal "aspiration" is to finally have basic financial security for my children and I so that we can, oh, I don't know, maybe have a decent home, take a week's vacation every couple of years, get a proper education and someday retire in comfort and dignity. We're not asking for a lot, and we're all too happy to work for it; I work too fucking hard to struggle so much to feed my children, to live paycheck to paycheck. Yes, sometimes I skip meals so that my kids don't have to. Yes, I once nearly died of sepsis from an easily treatable illness simply for lack of health care coverage. And yes, affordable housing is so scarce where I live that my two kids and I have been tripled up in my mother's spare bedroom since January because even most 1 bedroom apartments are wildly out of reach here. Food, health care, and shelter; I'm not asking for a lot when I work so hard to feed and nurture people for a living, especially when I live in the richest country mankind has ever seen. But people like this sanctimonious asshole aren't satisfied with merely being fabulously wealthy. They want to buy our government too, so they can continue to siphon our own meager wealth on up to themselves. And they won't be satisfied until they have all of it. Whew! You were right, David, that really pissed me off! Especially since he name-checked my own senator, Ron Wyden, who is just a corporatist in sheep's clothing. At least we still have Sen. Merkley here in Oregon, who actually fights to get money out of politics.
    4
  4257. 4
  4258. 4
  4259. 4
  4260. 4
  4261. 4
  4262. 4
  4263. 4
  4264. 4
  4265. 4
  4266. 4
  4267. 4
  4268. 4
  4269. 4
  4270. 4
  4271. 4
  4272. 4
  4273. 4
  4274. 4
  4275. 4
  4276. 4
  4277. 4
  4278. 4
  4279. 4
  4280. 4
  4281. 4
  4282. 4
  4283. 4
  4284. 4
  4285. 4
  4286. 4
  4287. 4
  4288. 4
  4289. 4
  4290. 4
  4291. 4
  4292. 4
  4293. 4
  4294. 4
  4295. 4
  4296. 4
  4297. 4
  4298. 4
  4299. 4
  4300. 4
  4301. 4
  4302. 4
  4303. Hey David, my apologies after a long night of studying, but I think you've missed the mark pretty badly on Mr. Jones. As someone who ran as a local candidate in the past, I believe you're aware that what's on a website is not representative of the entirety of what you're running on. Even though Jones is running for senate, which seems like something that should have big, national implications, the races are often heavily focused on local issues. So let me give you a brief rundown of things Doug Jones is on record as being for. Doug Jones has publicly called for protecting teacher's unions and expanding funding to public schools. Doug Jones has advocated for strong, protected voting rights laws (one of the very most important issues in the US, period). Doug Jones has advocated for expanding Medicaid in the state, advocated for Healthcare as a human right, and has endorsed universal Healthcare. Doug Jones has advocated for public investment(!!) in jobs across struggling rural communities. Doug Jones has also advocated for a living wage - and let me stop you for a moment as well. A living wage in and of itself is a huge commitment. A lack of specificity on this issue is not inherently negative. Perhaps more importantly, we need to get this idea of "$15 or bust" out of our heads. $10/hr in Alabama is likely a living wage across most of that state, and a system that guarantees a living wage to everyone could be effectively regulated county-by-county. While most of these seem moderate or "establishment" in a national context, Doug Jones is likely the furthest left candidate for national office in Alabama in two decades. He is certainly the furthest left Democrat. Leftists should be cheering for his victory and immediately pushing him to be more specific, more committed, and more progressive. Lastly, on the topic of voters, enthusiasm and the party. Doug Jones is not the most charismatic guy, no issue there. But we should not be looking at this on an individual level. There are critical flaws and failures in the structure of the Democratic party that have nothing to do with political issues. As the party currently stands, it could magically have the strongest, most popular platform ever, and many of these candidates would still lose! You cannot consistently win on charisma or issues alone, you also need the systems behind you that make everything go. I'd highly suggest tuning into the Democratic Reform Commission and listening to what folks like Nomiki Konst and Nina Turner have to say, if you haven't already. I really rambled after all! I really do hope you read at least a little bit of it. Thank you for the video and cheers.
    4
  4304. 4
  4305. 4
  4306. 4
  4307. 4
  4308. 4
  4309. 4
  4310. 4
  4311. 4
  4312. 4
  4313. 4
  4314. 4
  4315. 4
  4316. 4
  4317. 4
  4318. 4
  4319. 4
  4320. 4
  4321. 4
  4322. 3
  4323. 3
  4324. 3
  4325. As a New Zealander watching all the way from Perth, Western Australia (yes, quite the mouthful), I only started taking an interest in US politics the moment I learned about Bernie Sanders and his progressive platform and having the courage to stand against the 1%. And then, Jeremy Corbyn emerged as UK Labour Party Leader along with the mass media smear campaign launched against him at every turn leading into the Brexit referendum and of course, last week's Snap Election resulting in his ultimate surge in popularity. Such an astonishing result that was. For a long time, I have been in search of independent media challenging what the corporate wing has been churning out over the years and funnily enough, that all began with Russell Brand's Trews lol. Then I stumbled upon TYT, which lead to the likes of Jimmy Dore, Kyle Kulinski's Secular Talk and The Humanist Report AND NOW most recently - your show, so I thank you for providing an honest and for lack of a better word, 'rational' point of view where other so-called progressive platforms choose to attack other outlets for disagreeing with their POVs (not naming names), so keep up the good work indeed, Dave. I'll become a Patron for sure - no worries mate! :) In other news, however, NZ is holding an election in September, just saying. Our last PM John Key was a stooge for Obama and was blatantly in support of the TPP which I do believe his resignation was the best thing he ever did. Furthermore, also believing he resigned because Trump became President which "was" going to derail his hopes of the TPP ever going ahead. Key was a Merill-Lynch banker on Wall Street btw so that too oughta tell you something. Anyway, NZ needs change as much as the UK and US but we're still a long way from the style of policies that Corbyn and Sanders are offering.
    3
  4326. 3
  4327. 3
  4328. 3
  4329. 3
  4330. 3
  4331. 3
  4332. 3
  4333. 3
  4334. 3
  4335. 3
  4336. 3
  4337. 3
  4338. 3
  4339. 3
  4340. 3
  4341. 3
  4342. 3
  4343. 3
  4344. 3
  4345. 3
  4346. 3
  4347. 3
  4348. 3
  4349. 3
  4350. 3
  4351. 3
  4352. 3
  4353. 3
  4354. 3
  4355. 3
  4356. 3
  4357. 3
  4358. 3
  4359. 3
  4360. 3
  4361. 3
  4362. 3
  4363. 3
  4364. 3
  4365. 3
  4366. 3
  4367. 3
  4368. 3
  4369. 3
  4370. 3
  4371. 3
  4372. 3
  4373. 3
  4374. 3
  4375. 3
  4376. 3
  4377. 3
  4378. 3
  4379. 3
  4380. 3
  4381. 3
  4382. 3
  4383. 3
  4384. 3
  4385. 3
  4386. 3
  4387. 3
  4388. 3
  4389. 3
  4390. 3
  4391. 3
  4392. 3
  4393. 3
  4394. 3
  4395. 3
  4396. 3
  4397. 3
  4398. 3
  4399. 3
  4400. 3
  4401. 3
  4402. 3
  4403. 3
  4404. 3
  4405. 3
  4406. 3
  4407. 3
  4408. 3
  4409. 3
  4410. 3
  4411. 3
  4412. 3
  4413. 3
  4414. 3
  4415. 3
  4416. 3
  4417. 3
  4418. 3
  4419. 3
  4420. 3
  4421. 3
  4422. 3
  4423. 3
  4424. 3
  4425. 3
  4426. 3
  4427. 3
  4428. 3
  4429. 3
  4430. 3
  4431. 3
  4432. 3
  4433. 3
  4434. 3
  4435. 3
  4436. 3
  4437. 3
  4438. 3
  4439. 3
  4440. David, only a few questions / commemts here in general and not being patronizing and these can be rhetorical obviously. do you incorporate SEO / keyword research? Just testing freestyle can help too while learning the more technical stuff that one doesnt know yet. For instance try simple tests like adding a politically relevant banking topic bc 1st national bank of texas is trending or has a high payout ad search. If someone says Hillary always reply when you can adding the word Clinton because it ranks higher with both words. Bernie Sanders? throw in 2016. Bernie Sanders 2016 is highest ranked. This are just random madeup tweaks or examples. Need more than twitter to draw more viewers. Need other owned sites as both draws and $ streams and backups, like syndicating your videos and content across media. People have complained about losing hundreds of videos. Heartbreaking stuff. Cant one request review of any demonitization with standard cut and paste replies to save time? Do the videos in question say they were demonitized or are there just no adsense ad bot matches from adverters at this time? Campaigns begin and end and advertizers change paramaters. Like they may not want to be on a national anthem protest video etc. after the first week when things get nastier so they exclude those matches on videos. Or they just want the first week of a video. You already know a this type stuff, so who am I talking to. You know about how the ad bots work now by checking out key things about your video, your audience, the devices they use, the comments, what they are guessing are your audience demographic etc... advertizers have their own bots and prowl and go bid in bot to bot auctions with youtube bots arbitraging the bids. Creators need to get an overview if they dont already have an idea of how to find the best ways to work the arena so to speak. I would be sure to put an educational fair use statement in the descriptions of videos when using video clips, including news clips, from others? Avoid other ppls music (and use nice free music) but I think you already avoid the music issue. which is a little saddish bc music is so good. but tricky. There are free tools that can help with optimization to improve your earnings where small techniques and tweaks and tips can add up. I will be back with one sample link to a guy on youtube who has a recent listing of top ten free keyword tools. https://youtu.be/qclUCIApN_o look in his description of his video he has the links. FYI on this video of yours I got three different ads run. google, kfc and a wordswift or some program that helps fill out forms automatically. Edit: do triple stack playlists? your playlists are under utilized. linked / affiliate marketing? where do ppl order your tshirt mug cap calendar etc? Where is your downloadable ebook... A Canadian's View of The State of American Progressive Politics? based off your channel. Sponsors. Mail Time where people send you money and gifts to your PO Box. Honestly some ppl will do that rather than PayPal or Patreon, but that too.
    3
  4441. 3
  4442. 3
  4443. 3
  4444. 3
  4445. 3
  4446. 3
  4447. 3
  4448. 3
  4449. 3
  4450. 3
  4451. 3
  4452. 3
  4453. 3
  4454. 3
  4455. 3
  4456. 3
  4457. 3
  4458. 3
  4459. 3
  4460. 3
  4461. 3
  4462. 3
  4463. 3
  4464. 3
  4465. 3
  4466. 3
  4467. 3
  4468. 3
  4469. 3
  4470. 3
  4471. 3
  4472. 3
  4473. 3
  4474. 3
  4475. 3
  4476. 3
  4477. 3
  4478. 3
  4479. 3
  4480. 3
  4481. 3
  4482. 3
  4483. 3
  4484. "Ford ran for the 2014 Toronto mayoral election and lost. In 2011, Ford promoted an alternative plan for the Port Lands district of Toronto, including a monorail, a boat-in hotel, the world's largest Ferris wheel and a mega-mall. The plan was ridiculed in the media and council voted it down—including by members of the mayoral executive committee. Ford caused controversy after revealing that his brother Rob would be served a subpoena if Rob's friend and driver Alexander Lisi went to court over charges of extortion. Ford commented that the subpoena was in "payback" of Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair not getting a contract renewal with the Toronto Police Service, saying "This is why we need a change at the top", in regards to Blair's contract. Blair filed a defamation lawsuit, demanding a written apology in exchange for dropping the suit. Ford apologized verbally and then later apologized and retracted the comments in writing. An investigative report by The Globe and Mail published in May 2013 alleged that Ford sold hashish at James Gardens for several years in the 1980s, based on interviews with anonymous sources. Ford, who had never been charged with an offence, denied the allegations and accused the newspaper of unfairly targeting his brother, then-Mayor Rob Ford. The newspaper defended its report and its use of anonymous sources at an Ontario Press Council hearing, which dismissed complaints against the newspaper and found that its coverage was "fair and ethical". Ford said at the time that he planned to sue the newspaper for libel. When asked in a 2018 interview why he had not sued, he replied that he had decided a lawsuit would be a "waste of time". In regards to Northern Ontario, Ford criticized the Liberal government for not proceeding quickly enough to develop the Northern Ontario Ring of Fire, saying that he'd get on a bulldozer himself if necessary. His comments in regards to Ring of Fire development have been criticized as being "simplistic" and disregarding the patience required to negotiate with Indigenous peoples in regards to land claims and ensuring Indigenous communities receive a share of any economic gains." Yeah, "not" a loser, I guess.
    3
  4485. 3
  4486. 3
  4487. 3
  4488. 3
  4489. 3
  4490. 3
  4491. 3
  4492. 3
  4493. 3
  4494. 3
  4495. 3
  4496. 3
  4497. 3
  4498. 3
  4499. 3
  4500. 3
  4501. 3
  4502. 3
  4503. 3
  4504. 3
  4505. 3
  4506. 3
  4507. 3
  4508. 3
  4509. 3
  4510. 3
  4511. 3
  4512. 3
  4513. 3
  4514. 3
  4515. 3
  4516. 3
  4517. 3
  4518. 3
  4519. 3
  4520. 3
  4521. 3
  4522. 3
  4523. 3
  4524. 3
  4525. 3
  4526. 3
  4527. 3
  4528. 3
  4529. 3
  4530. 3
  4531. 3
  4532. 3
  4533. 3
  4534. 3
  4535. 3
  4536. 3
  4537. 3
  4538. 3
  4539. 3
  4540. 3
  4541. 3
  4542. 3
  4543. 3
  4544. 3
  4545. 3
  4546. 3
  4547. 3
  4548. 3
  4549. 3
  4550. 3
  4551. 3
  4552. 3
  4553. 3
  4554. 3
  4555. 3
  4556. 3
  4557. 3
  4558. 3
  4559. 3
  4560. 3
  4561. 3
  4562. 3
  4563. 3
  4564. 3
  4565. 3
  4566. 3
  4567. 3
  4568. 3
  4569. 3
  4570. 3
  4571. 3
  4572. 3
  4573. 3
  4574. 3
  4575. 3
  4576. 3
  4577. 3
  4578. 3
  4579. 3
  4580. 3
  4581. 3
  4582. 3
  4583. 3
  4584. 3
  4585. 3
  4586. 3
  4587. 3
  4588. 3
  4589. 3
  4590. 3
  4591. 3
  4592. 3
  4593. 3
  4594. 3
  4595. 3
  4596. 3
  4597. 3
  4598. 3
  4599. 3
  4600. 3
  4601. 3
  4602. 3
  4603. 3
  4604. 3
  4605. 3
  4606. 3
  4607. 3
  4608. 3
  4609. 3
  4610. 3
  4611. 3
  4612. 3
  4613. 3
  4614. 3
  4615. 3
  4616. 3
  4617. 3
  4618. 3
  4619. 3
  4620. 3
  4621. 3
  4622. 3
  4623. 3
  4624. 3
  4625. 3
  4626. 3
  4627. 3
  4628. 3
  4629. 3
  4630. 3
  4631. 3
  4632. 3
  4633. 3
  4634. 3
  4635. 3
  4636. 3
  4637. 3
  4638. 3
  4639. 3
  4640. 3
  4641. 3
  4642. 3
  4643. 3
  4644. 3
  4645. 3
  4646. 3
  4647. 3
  4648. 3
  4649. 3
  4650. 3
  4651. 3
  4652. 3
  4653. 3
  4654. 3
  4655. 3
  4656. 3
  4657. 3
  4658. 3
  4659. 3
  4660. 3
  4661. 3
  4662. 3
  4663. 3
  4664. 3
  4665. 3
  4666. 3
  4667. 3
  4668. 3
  4669. 3
  4670. 3
  4671. 3
  4672. 3
  4673. 3
  4674. 3
  4675. 3
  4676. 3
  4677. 3
  4678. 3
  4679. 3
  4680. 3
  4681. 3
  4682. 3
  4683. 3
  4684. 3
  4685. 3
  4686. 3
  4687. 3
  4688. 3
  4689. 3
  4690. 3
  4691. 3
  4692. 3
  4693. 3
  4694. 3
  4695. 3
  4696. 3
  4697. 3
  4698. 3
  4699. 3
  4700. 3
  4701. 3
  4702. 3
  4703. 3
  4704. 3
  4705. 3
  4706. 3
  4707. 3
  4708. 3
  4709. 3
  4710. 3
  4711. 3
  4712. 3
  4713. 3
  4714. 3
  4715. 3
  4716. 3
  4717. 3
  4718. 3
  4719. 3
  4720. 3
  4721. 2
  4722. 2
  4723. 2
  4724. 2
  4725. 2
  4726. 2
  4727. 2
  4728. 2
  4729. 2
  4730. 2
  4731. 2
  4732. 2
  4733. 2
  4734. 2
  4735. 2
  4736. 2
  4737. 2
  4738. 2
  4739. 2
  4740. 2
  4741. 2
  4742. 2
  4743. 2
  4744. 2
  4745. 2
  4746. Lets be honest to all. Whether you like Jeremy Corbyn or Not. I can actually show you UK newspapers that were hostile and went pass the mark in personal attacks on the man. He showed dignity and professionalism most of times when ever he was asked to appear on the " UK Media". Theresa May, lost a lot of credibility around the Uk in regards to her refusal to debate to the nation about her Manifesto against Jeremy Corbyn and the Political leaders from the Uk - leading up to the debate about their manifesto. PEOPLE DON'T FORGET THESE THINGS David Cameron (TORY) called out Gordon Brown (LABOUR) to appear on a live Debate and he really didn't want to appear. And eventual he did When Theresa May and the Tory Party finally did come out clean about the Tory manifesto - it shocked alot of people around the UK - even amoungst Tory supporters - who couldn't believe what they were hearing. And to top it all it wasn't costed!!! The Labour party lost the General Election that is fact. But, they "Won" over the minds of a lot of people around the country as they wanted to discuss policies (*which they costed!!) - instead of smearing people/s. People want to know what yo are going to try an help them - Not wanting hear about "Smears" about people all the time People general do not like "bullies"; and the countless amounts of peoples that have come out and stated that they were wrong about Jeremy Corbyn is eye opening as well. The same peoples/media outlets that were for the Tory party are now attacking Theresa May and why did she call or an early election and her manifesto.....
    2
  4747. 2
  4748. 2
  4749. 2
  4750. 2
  4751. 2
  4752. 2
  4753. 2
  4754. 2
  4755. 2
  4756. 2
  4757. 2
  4758. 2
  4759. 2
  4760. 2
  4761. 2
  4762. 2
  4763. 2
  4764. 2
  4765. 2
  4766. 2
  4767. 2
  4768. 2
  4769. 2
  4770. 2
  4771. 2
  4772. 2
  4773. 2
  4774. 2
  4775. 2
  4776. 2
  4777. 2
  4778. 2
  4779. 2
  4780. 2
  4781. 2
  4782. 2
  4783. 2
  4784. 2
  4785. 2
  4786. 2
  4787. 2
  4788. 2
  4789. 2
  4790. 2
  4791. 2
  4792. 2
  4793. 2
  4794. 2
  4795. 2
  4796. 2
  4797. 2
  4798. 2
  4799. 2
  4800. 2
  4801. 2
  4802. 2
  4803. 2
  4804. 2
  4805. 2
  4806. 2
  4807. 2
  4808. I understand the sentiment completely, and in the case of the United States and Britain, and likely the rest of Europe, a socialist revolution seems on the rise, and for good reason. Corporations have really manipulated their political systems unabashedly. Now the chickens are coming home to roost, and the backlash is nigh. But Canada is a bit different. It's been implementing progressive policies incrementally, and the neoliberals that run Canada are actually liberals (and also literally Liberal, as in their party name). They have their buddies in the corporate sector, but by and large the corporate sector likes all of the social programs implemented by the government, because that means they have less social programs that they need to implemented for their own employees. Also for the most part, corporations don't bear a big burden of the social programs, it's mostly paid for through income and sales taxes. Corporate taxes in Canada are pretty low. Corporations have no reason to be against social programs, and actually benefit from them. So unlike American Democrats, who are neoliberals but are actually old-school conservatives, Canadian neoliberals are old-school liberals. So there isn't really a groundswell of support for NDP or other far-left parties, because the center-left party has been by and large responsive to Canadian's demands. This happens in both the provincial and federal levels, the Liberals seem to draw on massive support because no one is really too worried about them cutting social programs. Now, I think one problem with the Liberals is that they get into power and do break some promises. Such as Trudeau reneging on his promise to reform the Canadian electoral system, because now that he's in power, he's happy that the existing system got him elected. If he was smart, then he should have gone through with his promise, and likely he would've been voted back in with another majority because he actually did keep his promise. For that reason alone, I'd be inclined to vote NDP this time.
    2
  4809. 2
  4810. 2
  4811. 2
  4812. 2
  4813. 2
  4814. 2
  4815. 2
  4816. 2
  4817. 2
  4818. 2
  4819. 2
  4820. 2
  4821. 2
  4822. 2
  4823. 2
  4824. 2
  4825. 2
  4826. 2
  4827. 2
  4828. 2
  4829. 2
  4830. 2
  4831. 2
  4832. 2
  4833. 2
  4834. 2
  4835. 2
  4836. 2
  4837. 2
  4838. 2
  4839. 2
  4840. 2
  4841. 2
  4842. 2
  4843. 2
  4844. 2
  4845. 2
  4846. 2
  4847. 2
  4848. 2
  4849. 2
  4850. 2
  4851. 2
  4852. 2
  4853. 2
  4854. 2
  4855. 2
  4856. 2
  4857. 2
  4858. 2
  4859. 2
  4860. 2
  4861. 2
  4862. 2
  4863. 2
  4864. 2
  4865. 2
  4866. 2
  4867. 2
  4868. 2
  4869. 2
  4870. 2
  4871. 2
  4872. 2
  4873. 2
  4874. 2
  4875. 2
  4876. 2
  4877. 2
  4878. 2
  4879. 2
  4880. 2
  4881. 2
  4882. 2
  4883. 2
  4884. 2
  4885. 2
  4886. 2
  4887. 2
  4888. 2
  4889. 2
  4890. 2
  4891. 2
  4892. 2
  4893. 2
  4894. 2
  4895. 2
  4896. 2
  4897. 2
  4898. 2
  4899. 2
  4900. 2
  4901. 2
  4902. 2
  4903. 2
  4904. Add a link to your favorite book/cd/etc. to the description in your video, to your Amazon Associates Program. You get about 5% of every sale forever and ever. If you wonder why: because Youtube was ultimately taken over by Google. See Dejanews. http://www.fastusenet.org/blog/what-is-dejanews-where-did-it-go.html By the way my channel of many years was blocked for some mysterious reason. They never said why, so I'd have to guess. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Google-Acquires-Dejacom-17652.asp Why Dejanews was important: "DejaNews revolutionized the nature of Usenet. First, it offered a Web-based view of Usenet. Although Web browsers dating back to Mosaic include the ability to read and post on Usenet, many users never explored those features. DejaNews' Web interface exposed Usenet to millions of Web users; in fact, many new users thought that DejaNews was Usenet." What happened when Google took over: "As for the Google takeover, Deja's rich structured-searching functionality was lost, replaced by Google's much simpler interface. Google admitted the shortcomings of its search interface, while attempting to emphasize the positive: "The current beta service available on this site lacks browsing, posting, and many other important features. We are working hard to provide these. Due to the logistical and financial constraints of the Deja service, there was no viable way to keep the service going. Now that the Usenet data has been safely archived, we are focusing our efforts on implementing these important features. Please bear with us during this transition."" ""Deja Refugee," who requested anonymity in order to protect professional relationships, also noted the link-rot effect of the abrupt switchover: "As of February 12, all the major search engines, including Google—and some Web sites of Google's own search engine customers—now have THOUSANDS OF INDEXED WEB PAGES WITH LINKS GOOGLE HAS BROKEN—links to Deja articles which no longer work. For that matter, many of Deja's postings themselves contain links (also presumably now broken) to other postings. In other words, Google has instantaneously devalued the content it acquired." "Search engine experts also took note. Greg R. Notess commented on searchengineshowdown.com: "The database is considerably smaller and the search features much less powerful than we had on Deja last week.""
    2
  4905. 2
  4906. 2
  4907. 2
  4908. 2
  4909. 2
  4910. 2
  4911. 2
  4912. 2
  4913. 2
  4914. 2
  4915. 2
  4916. 2
  4917. 2
  4918. 2
  4919. 2
  4920. 2
  4921. 2
  4922. 2
  4923. 2
  4924. 2
  4925. 2
  4926. 2
  4927. 2
  4928. 2
  4929. 2
  4930. 2
  4931. 2
  4932. 2
  4933. 2
  4934. 2
  4935. 2
  4936. 2
  4937. 2
  4938. 2
  4939. 2
  4940. 2
  4941. 2
  4942. 2
  4943. 2
  4944. 2
  4945. 2
  4946. 2
  4947. 2
  4948. 2
  4949. 2
  4950. 2
  4951. 2
  4952. 2
  4953. 2
  4954. 2
  4955. 2
  4956. 2
  4957. 2
  4958. 2
  4959. 2
  4960. 2
  4961. 2
  4962. 2
  4963. 2
  4964. 2
  4965. 2
  4966. 2
  4967. 2
  4968. 2
  4969. 2
  4970. 2
  4971. 2
  4972. 2
  4973. 2
  4974. 2
  4975. 2
  4976. 2
  4977. 2
  4978. 2
  4979. 2
  4980. 2
  4981. 2
  4982. 2
  4983. 2
  4984. 2
  4985. 2
  4986. 2
  4987. 2
  4988. 2
  4989. 2
  4990. 2
  4991. 2
  4992. 2
  4993. 2
  4994. 2
  4995. 2
  4996. 2
  4997. 2
  4998. 2
  4999. 2
  5000. 2
  5001. 2
  5002. 2
  5003. 2
  5004. 2
  5005. 2
  5006. 2
  5007. 2
  5008. 2
  5009. 2
  5010. 2
  5011. 2
  5012. 2
  5013. 2
  5014. 2
  5015. 2
  5016. 2
  5017. 2
  5018. 2
  5019. 2
  5020. 2
  5021. 2
  5022. 2
  5023. 2
  5024. 2
  5025. 2
  5026. 2
  5027. 2
  5028. 2
  5029. 2
  5030. 2
  5031. 2
  5032. 2
  5033. 2
  5034. 2
  5035. 2
  5036. 2
  5037. 2
  5038. 2
  5039. 2
  5040. 2
  5041. 2
  5042. 2
  5043. 2
  5044. 2
  5045. 2
  5046. 2
  5047. 2
  5048. 2
  5049. 2
  5050. 2
  5051. 2
  5052. 2
  5053. 2
  5054. 2
  5055. 2
  5056. 2
  5057. 2
  5058. I have one point of contention with the "you have nothing to worry about" statement - but it actually agrees with your overall argument. YouTube has had multiple controversies around restricting access to and inexplicably punishing channels that produce LGBTQ+ content. Users viewing the site in restricted mode - something parents use to filter out content that isn't meant for children - often have these channels totally filtered out, with few if any of their videos visible. This is true even for channels specifically geared towards LGBTQ+ youth. And this is just one aspect of the ongoing treating of this demographic on YouTube (and on other sites besides, including Twitter and digital storefronts like Steam). So these users actually do have a lot to worry about. This, though, is why you're still right that the slippery slope argument is fallacious. Because we're already at the bottom of the slope - anybody who tells a trans content creator that they shouldn't be excited about Alex Jones getting the boot because they might be next doesn't understand that these creators are ALREADY being hit with unfair treatment. ALEX JONES is the "next" on the slippery slope. The same is true for Twitter, which refuses to punish Alex Jones and openly lies to its users by saying that Jones as never broken their terms of service - many users can tell you about how they've had accounts suspended or otherwise punished just for calling Jones bigoted after going on one of his bigoted, conspiracy-theory-fueled screeds. So do you really have nothing to worry about if you're not constantly peddling conspiracy theories and hate speech? Well, you do, actually - turns out marginalized people are also marginalized on the internet. Big surprise. But that's exactly why nobody can defend Jones by saying that we'll be next - we were first, actually. YOU'RE next. And that's a good thing, because at some point we have to step back and accept the burden of needing to look at the world and decide what is and isn't acceptable. And Alex Jones is not acceptable.
    2
  5059. 2
  5060. 2
  5061. 2
  5062. 2
  5063. 2
  5064. 2
  5065. 2
  5066. 2
  5067. 2
  5068. 2
  5069. 2
  5070. 2
  5071. 2
  5072. 2
  5073. 2
  5074. 2
  5075. 2
  5076. 2
  5077. 2
  5078. 2
  5079. 2
  5080. 2
  5081. 2
  5082. 2
  5083. 2
  5084. 2
  5085. 2
  5086. 2
  5087. 2
  5088. 2
  5089. 2
  5090. 2
  5091. 2
  5092. 2
  5093. 2
  5094. 2
  5095. 2
  5096. 2
  5097. 2
  5098. 2
  5099. 2
  5100. 2
  5101. 2
  5102. 2
  5103. 2
  5104. 2
  5105. 2
  5106. 2
  5107. 2
  5108. 2
  5109. 2
  5110. 2
  5111. 2
  5112. 2
  5113. 2
  5114. 2
  5115. 2
  5116. 2
  5117. 2
  5118. 2
  5119. 2
  5120. 2
  5121. 2
  5122. 2
  5123. 2
  5124. 2
  5125. 2
  5126. 2
  5127. 2
  5128. 2
  5129. 2
  5130. 2
  5131. 2
  5132. 2
  5133. 2
  5134. 2
  5135. 2
  5136. 2
  5137. 2
  5138. 2
  5139. 2
  5140. 2
  5141. 2
  5142. 2
  5143. 2
  5144. 2
  5145. First of all,why is she even asking this guy? And why should she care what this one person thinks?This dude looks terrified. Shouldn't he be frightened of white supremacists and people running around with automatic weapons? With his attitude,why doesn't he hop on the GOP train? What is his actual ideology as a democrat anyway? Nothing is mentioned beside his obvious terror and Donald status .David is absolutely correct in that they are advertising their corruption just by entertaining this conversation,by him being her guest and seeming to be unaware of what they just revealed as if it is totally normal and acceptable for this one guy to be her single guest , who has on one one's with a cable host and multiple US senators and can threaten them with his fearful opinion WOW, is the corruption so everyday,deep and normalized that it probably floats right over the heads of most viewers,not setting off the appropriate radars and alarms?Additionally,if Mr billionaire( uhh-oh I said the offending adjective and it is interesting that he identifies the word as descriptor rather than noun) is not into the GOP tax cuts and other cow towing to their wealthy donors ,what is this terror that strikes his heart in regard to progressives ?He is on a pedestal but it is simply subconscious and therefore so is the fear of the fall? David puts a spotlight on Another relavent topic and gives us an excellent take on this skewed disfunctional, obfuscated issue that may not be covered anywhere else or by anyone else but the estute David Doel. My extended babbling rant is over...I certainly was triggered!
    2
  5146. 2
  5147. 2
  5148. 2
  5149. 2
  5150. 2
  5151. 2
  5152. 2
  5153. 2
  5154. 2
  5155. 2
  5156. 2
  5157. 2
  5158. 2
  5159. 2
  5160. 2
  5161. 2
  5162. 2
  5163. 2
  5164. 2
  5165. 2
  5166. 2
  5167. 2
  5168. 2
  5169. 2
  5170. 2
  5171. 2
  5172. 2
  5173. 2
  5174. 2
  5175. 2
  5176. 2
  5177. 2
  5178. 2
  5179. 2
  5180. 2
  5181. 2
  5182. 2
  5183. 2
  5184. 2
  5185. 2
  5186. 2
  5187. 2
  5188. 2
  5189. 2
  5190. 2
  5191. 2
  5192. 2
  5193. 2
  5194. 2
  5195. 2
  5196. 2
  5197. 2
  5198. 2
  5199. 2
  5200. 2
  5201. 2
  5202. 2
  5203. 2
  5204. 2
  5205. 2
  5206. 2
  5207. 2
  5208. 2
  5209. 2
  5210. 2
  5211. 2
  5212. 2
  5213. 2
  5214. 2
  5215. 2
  5216. 2
  5217. 2
  5218. 2
  5219. 2
  5220. 2
  5221. 2
  5222. 2
  5223. 2
  5224. 2
  5225. 2
  5226. 2
  5227. 2
  5228. 2
  5229. 2
  5230. 2
  5231. 2
  5232. 2
  5233. 2
  5234. 2
  5235. 2
  5236. 2
  5237. 2
  5238. 2
  5239. 2
  5240. 2
  5241. 2
  5242. 2
  5243. 2
  5244. 2
  5245. 2
  5246. 2
  5247. 2
  5248. 2
  5249. 2
  5250. 2
  5251. 2
  5252. 2
  5253. 2
  5254. 2
  5255. 2
  5256. 2
  5257. 2
  5258. 2
  5259. 2
  5260. 2
  5261. 2
  5262. 2
  5263. 2
  5264. 2
  5265. 2
  5266. 2
  5267. 2
  5268. 2
  5269. 2
  5270. 2
  5271. 2
  5272. 2
  5273. 2
  5274. 2
  5275. 2
  5276. 2
  5277. 2
  5278. 2
  5279. 2
  5280. 2
  5281. 2
  5282. 2
  5283. 2
  5284. 2
  5285. 2
  5286. 2
  5287. 2
  5288. 2
  5289. 2
  5290. 2
  5291. 2
  5292. 2
  5293. 2
  5294. 2
  5295. 2
  5296. 2
  5297. 2
  5298. 2
  5299. 2
  5300. 2
  5301. 2
  5302. 2
  5303. 2
  5304. 2
  5305. 2
  5306. 2
  5307. 2
  5308. 2
  5309. 2
  5310. 2
  5311. 2
  5312. 2
  5313. 2
  5314. 2
  5315. 2
  5316. 2
  5317. 2
  5318. 2
  5319. 2
  5320. 2
  5321. 2
  5322. 2
  5323. 2
  5324. 2
  5325. 2
  5326. 2
  5327. 2
  5328. 2
  5329. 2
  5330. 2
  5331. 2
  5332. 2
  5333. 2
  5334. 2
  5335. 2
  5336. 2
  5337. 2
  5338. 2
  5339. 2
  5340. 2
  5341. 2
  5342. 2
  5343. 2
  5344. 2
  5345. 2
  5346. 2
  5347. 2
  5348. 2
  5349. 2
  5350. 2
  5351. 2
  5352. 2
  5353. 2
  5354. 2
  5355. 2
  5356. 2
  5357. 2
  5358. 2
  5359. 2
  5360. 2
  5361. 2
  5362. 2
  5363. 2
  5364. 2
  5365. 2
  5366. 2
  5367. 2
  5368. 2
  5369. 2
  5370. 2
  5371. 2
  5372. 2
  5373. 2
  5374. 2
  5375. 2
  5376. 2
  5377. 2
  5378. 2
  5379. 2
  5380. 2
  5381. 2
  5382. 2
  5383. 2
  5384. 2
  5385. 2
  5386. 2
  5387. 2
  5388. 2
  5389. 2
  5390. 2
  5391. 2
  5392. 2
  5393. 2
  5394. 2
  5395. 2
  5396. 2
  5397. 2
  5398. 2
  5399. 2
  5400. 2
  5401. 2
  5402. 2
  5403. 2
  5404. 2
  5405. 2
  5406. 2
  5407. 2
  5408. 2
  5409. 2
  5410. 2
  5411. 2
  5412. 2
  5413. 2
  5414. 2
  5415. 2
  5416. 2
  5417. 2
  5418. 2
  5419. 2
  5420. 2
  5421. 2
  5422. 2
  5423. 2
  5424. 2
  5425. 2
  5426. 2
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435. 1
  5436. 1
  5437. 1
  5438. 1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445. 1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449. 1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1
  5464. 1
  5465. 1
  5466. 1
  5467. 1
  5468. 1
  5469. 1
  5470. 1
  5471. 1
  5472. 1
  5473. 1
  5474. 1
  5475. 1
  5476. 1
  5477. 1
  5478. 1
  5479. 1
  5480. 1
  5481. 1
  5482. 1
  5483. 1
  5484. 1
  5485. 1
  5486. 1
  5487. 1
  5488. 1
  5489. 1
  5490. 1
  5491. 1
  5492. 1
  5493. 1
  5494. 1
  5495. 1
  5496. 1
  5497. 1
  5498. 1
  5499. 1
  5500. 1
  5501. 1
  5502. 1
  5503. 1
  5504. 1
  5505. 1
  5506. 1
  5507. 1
  5508. 1
  5509. 1
  5510. 1
  5511. 1
  5512. 1
  5513. 1
  5514. 1
  5515. 1
  5516. 1
  5517. 1
  5518. 1
  5519. 1
  5520. 1
  5521. 1
  5522. 1
  5523. 1
  5524. 1
  5525. 1
  5526. 1
  5527. 1
  5528. 1
  5529. 1
  5530. 1
  5531. 1
  5532. 1
  5533. 1
  5534. 1
  5535. 1
  5536. 1
  5537. 1
  5538. 1
  5539. 1
  5540. 1
  5541. 1
  5542. 1
  5543. 1
  5544. 1
  5545. 1
  5546. 1
  5547. 1
  5548. 1
  5549. 1
  5550. 1
  5551. 1
  5552. 1
  5553. 1
  5554. 1
  5555. 1
  5556. 1
  5557. 1
  5558. 1
  5559. 1
  5560. 1
  5561. 1
  5562. 1
  5563. 1
  5564. 1
  5565. 1
  5566. 1
  5567. 1
  5568. 1
  5569. 1
  5570. 1
  5571. 1
  5572. 1
  5573. 1
  5574. 1
  5575. 1
  5576. 1
  5577. 1
  5578. 1
  5579. 1
  5580. 1
  5581. 1
  5582. 1
  5583. 1
  5584. 1
  5585. 1
  5586. 1
  5587. 1
  5588. 1
  5589. 1