Hearted Youtube comments on Forgotten Weapons (@ForgottenWeapons) channel.

  1. 335
  2. 333
  3. 331
  4. 330
  5. 327
  6. 326
  7. 323
  8. 318
  9. 316
  10. 316
  11. 315
  12. 313
  13. 311
  14. 310
  15. 310
  16. 309
  17. 303
  18. 302
  19. 298
  20. 298
  21. 297
  22. 294
  23. 292
  24.  @CZProtton  former soldier. I was issued a VHS-D1 and later a VHS-2D, original model, prior to product improvement. in the field it was perfectly serviceable, if a bit heavy. I absolutely hated the 3 point sling, mostly due to the doctrine of use. We had to use the guardsman's carry, rather than the legionaire's carry, so the gun always hung in front of you or even between your legs. On terrain, I reverted to legionaire's carry, so when unslung, it would hag by my side almost like a pistol and was much easier to swing behind on my back from that position when I needed it out of the way. The sights on my rifles were copies of HK sights, drum sight on the VHS-2. Very pointable and easy to align. Quite open and a very good sight picture. Utterly useless in low light conditions. The weight of the rifle was terrible. 3.9kg empty for the VHS-2D is far, far, far from ideal. Maintenance was quite easy and it really wasn't a pampered diva that demanded constant polishing and rubbing, doctrine of use aside. In terms of accuracy, "good enough for government work" as they say. I'm probably a better shooter than most, but no marksman and at 100m 5 shot groups the size of a closed fist, so 2-3 MoA roughly, with irons. I did have a problem with my particular rifle, as the flash hider would loosen after 3 shots and then the bullets would start flying willy-nilly. When it wasn't important, I didn't bother tightening it to prevent, to not damage the rifle and to not make cleaning and maintenance more of a chore. in filed, I'd either take it off or overtighten it. Having an AK style pin system to hold it in place would have been better. one last thing i noticed is that in the field, it sticks out like a sore thumb and de-camouflages the soldier. because it has a very large profile and is pitch black, it is impossible not to see in the field. it becomes a really obvious big black blob. they should start making them in FDE or just camo tape them, which is what I did with mine on one particular field exercise and the difference was staggering. The proprietary mgazines for the VHS-2 were much better than the original ones and I much prefer the G-36 style latch method to the AR style. the VHS-2 is an improvement in every way over the VHS-1, except the weight. Ergonomically better, easier to disassemble and maintain. Materials were also improved significantly. The VHS-1 could rapid fire 120 rounds before the barrel became too hot. VHS-2 upped this to 350 rounds. It's no ultra-modernized AR or AK, but it is perfectly good rifle that can hold it's own no problem with any competitor out there. In terms of bulpups, it is one of the better ones.
    289
  25. 285
  26. 285
  27. 285
  28. 282
  29. 282
  30. 280
  31. 280
  32. 278
  33. 278
  34. 277
  35. 276
  36. 276
  37. 276
  38. 272
  39. 268
  40. 267
  41. 262
  42. 259
  43. 258
  44. 257
  45. 257
  46. 257
  47. 255
  48. 254
  49. 252
  50. 251