Hearted Youtube comments on Forgotten Weapons (@ForgottenWeapons) channel.
-
335
-
333
-
331
-
330
-
327
-
326
-
323
-
318
-
Might get lost in the comments here, but Ian, I want to thank you for being one of, if not THE, leading historian cataloging as much as you possibly can across a wide array of firearms and engineering. I'd like to imagine one day an entire bookshelf of my home dedicated to your published works, as well as those books being used as reference material for other students of history and engineering, firearms designers, and hobbyists for centuries to come. It isn't recognized very often, but you have devoted a very substantial chunk of your life to doing work that most people don't even think about.
Thank you for doing what you do, I sincerely hope your name is high up in the history books, have yourself a happy new year!
316
-
316
-
315
-
313
-
311
-
310
-
310
-
Darn it Ian, whenever I think that I've got a nice gun idea, you jump in like, "Been there, done it" ;) , I've just got myself a trashy Polish AKM with a bent barrel, in order to do exactly that, just using a Mini-Beryl gas block/front sight, and old Beryl side-folder stock... I work in a gun store in Poland so sometimes I get some old surpluss firearms that are too messed up for sale, and that's also why I'm using Polish parts, it's much easier to get the regional product... Also, I'm going to cut my barrel a tiny bit longer, i'm going for about 10 inches (I want a gun, not a repeating flashbang...) It's nice to see though that I'm sometimes getting similar ideas as Gun Jesus did, even if I'm a bit late ;)
309
-
303
-
302
-
298
-
6:38 Dmitri Kochetov is actually quite a notable man. Coming from the line of Tula gunsmiths, a brilliant student, he was employed as an army gunsmith during WWI, where he used not just to service guns, but to invent some new devices such as flare launchers. In 1920 he was employed as the head of hunting arms department of Tula Arms Factory, and worked on the design of a shotgun that was later given as a gift to Lenin. He was involved in designing civilian firearms, and his most brilliant child would be a TOZ-8 rimfire rifle, designed in order to compete with german sports rifle designs and a new rifle designed by Alexey Smirnsky (another soviet designer and participant of Stockholm Olympics in 1912, he also designed a PE top mount for Mosin). Also he designed a first soviet civilian hunting rifle, NK-8,2
298
-
297
-
294
-
292
-
@CZProtton former soldier.
I was issued a VHS-D1 and later a VHS-2D, original model, prior to product improvement.
in the field it was perfectly serviceable, if a bit heavy. I absolutely hated the 3 point sling, mostly due to the doctrine of use.
We had to use the guardsman's carry, rather than the legionaire's carry, so the gun always hung in front of you or even between your legs. On terrain, I reverted to legionaire's carry, so when unslung, it would hag by my side almost like a pistol and was much easier to swing behind on my back from that position when I needed it out of the way.
The sights on my rifles were copies of HK sights, drum sight on the VHS-2. Very pointable and easy to align. Quite open and a very good sight picture. Utterly useless in low light conditions.
The weight of the rifle was terrible. 3.9kg empty for the VHS-2D is far, far, far from ideal. Maintenance was quite easy and it really wasn't a pampered diva that demanded constant polishing and rubbing, doctrine of use aside.
In terms of accuracy, "good enough for government work" as they say. I'm probably a better shooter than most, but no marksman and at 100m 5 shot groups the size of a closed fist, so 2-3 MoA roughly, with irons.
I did have a problem with my particular rifle, as the flash hider would loosen after 3 shots and then the bullets would start flying willy-nilly.
When it wasn't important, I didn't bother tightening it to prevent, to not damage the rifle and to not make cleaning and maintenance more of a chore. in filed, I'd either take it off or overtighten it. Having an AK style pin system to hold it in place would have been better.
one last thing i noticed is that in the field, it sticks out like a sore thumb and de-camouflages the soldier.
because it has a very large profile and is pitch black, it is impossible not to see in the field. it becomes a really obvious big black blob.
they should start making them in FDE or just camo tape them, which is what I did with mine on one particular field exercise and the difference was staggering.
The proprietary mgazines for the VHS-2 were much better than the original ones and I much prefer the G-36 style latch method to the AR style.
the VHS-2 is an improvement in every way over the VHS-1, except the weight. Ergonomically better, easier to disassemble and maintain.
Materials were also improved significantly.
The VHS-1 could rapid fire 120 rounds before the barrel became too hot. VHS-2 upped this to 350 rounds.
It's no ultra-modernized AR or AK, but it is perfectly good rifle that can hold it's own no problem with any competitor out there.
In terms of bulpups, it is one of the better ones.
289
-
285
-
285
-
285
-
282
-
282
-
280
-
280
-
278
-
278
-
The adoption of the M240 by the US was driven by the absolutely dismal performance of the M73 as a tank coaxial machinegun. The relatively flimsy receiver of the M60 (and resultant light weight) was useful as an infantry weapon, but it caused problems when the gun was mounted. Firing the M60 caused it to beat itself apart and it would eventually get to the point you could change everything from the flash suppressor to the buttplate and the receiver would not hold them in close enough formation to be reliable. Once upon a time the unit armorer had a "stretch" gage for the receiver and he could check for excessively worn receiver. Replacement receivers were actually once a repair part. By the late Seventies, early Eighties armorers were condemning receivers at an alarming rate and the stock of replacement receivers was exhausted. To solve the problem Ordnance took away the gages. If the M60 was used as a pure infantry weapon and only fired off the bipod or the shoulder it would last maybe 30,000 to 40,000 rounds before it got to that point. If it was mounted, using the mount adapter, like on its tripod, on an ACAV, or a gun jeep 12,000 rounds was enough to stretch it beyond limits. It's a pays yer money, takes yer pick kinda situation.
277
-
276
-
276
-
276
-
272
-
268
-
267
-
262
-
259
-
258
-
257
-
257
-
257
-
255
-
254
-
252
-
251