Comments by "Yesica1993" (@Yesica1993) on "The Critical Drinker"
channel.
-
434
-
383
-
322
-
245
-
243
-
161
-
121
-
99
-
77
-
74
-
62
-
57
-
47
-
44
-
40
-
40
-
34
-
29
-
26
-
22
-
21
-
18
-
17
-
13
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Haven't seen the movie and now have no desire to. But that's what I got from this review, as well as from a more detailed, point by point plot description I read on another site. The thing is, it would've been bad enough if he'd left his family for another woman. Why make it a man? To hear Drinker call it religious prejudice or bigotry (some phrase like that) felt like a punch in the gut. If it had been another woman instead of man, would he have said that? Most people, Christian or religious or not, still know it's morally wrong to cheat and leave your spouse like that. Doubly so if it involved leaving your child. He would've never called it religious prejudice/bigotry if it had been a woman. But because for 2,000 years, and way more than that, if you include the Old Testament, the Bible has frowned on sodomy. It's not like it's a secret. And I'm guessing it's not the only religion that does. But it's always Christians/Christianity that's the villains. No other religion is treated this way, except maybe Judaism at times. And that's just the root of Christianity, so it's similar. This was so disappointing.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4