Comments by "Joseph Jones" (@drip369) on "Is Jesus Historical? What Do The Romans Say About Him?" video.

  1. Every time you say Christos you are saying that the Greeks said the same word, or title, as the Jews when they said Messiach, or Messiah, which means anointed one, as Christ is a title, not a last name folks. Also, people completely get this wrong but it said that He rose on the third day, not after 3 days, because if you look into the Book of Genesis a day begins at dusk and ends at sundown and the Sabbath is on Saturday, and the point where the body was killed before the dark period is just before Saturday probably around 2 in the afternoon, give or take, then you go all the way until Sunday at sunrise and the Christ was already gone, which you can say sunrise at that point in time was probably 7 in the morning so some have done the math with more accurate timing and you could easily say that the body of the Christ was only dead for less than 1.5 days or less than 18 hours so the phrasing of three days isn't a Christian bias, it's just a bad interpretation, especially since you need to make a 10% difference in the actual literature to publish your own version or perversion of a Bible. That dark period was also accounted for in Chinese records, assuming a god had died. A 3-4hr dark period, all starts and suns shut off, making it impossible to be any sort of eclipse but it was recorded in an area of the world that didn't see the ministry but then again if you look through the written language of the Chinese you will see every indicator towards a garden sin and global flood. Of course science always points to the need for some designer versus random chance so it's nice that science continuously proves the Bible's true like how all of my cells contain all the minerals found in soil when the Bible says we were pulled out of the dirt long before childbirth was a punishment for women
    1