Comments by "Joseph Jones" (@drip369) on "PowerfulJRE"
channel.
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
None of the fossil records explain any evolutionary changes, all they show is a couple of different designs. Not one single primate grew a forehead to become human, and some people may say the Sasquatch is the missing link but name another primate that has a claw on the back of its heel? I'll wait. There's nothing new from thousands of years ago outside of a couple of different color changes and sizes. Everything is still the same, there is no crossovers of different animals becoming other animals in the fossil records, that's why when you read about anything that has to do with Evolution you will notice the language always begins the article or paragraph with imaginary language. It's always imagine this, think of it that way, picture it this way, etc etc. It's always imaginary language
Also, carbon dating only has an accuracy of about 5,500 years, and if you think science allows errors beyond a multiple of decimal points, why would science then allow billions of years of error to explain the age of the Earth anything above the number one is a big enough error that the results and the testing methods are considered invalid. So if carbon dating can claim this part of a rock is 6,000 years old and that part of the very same rock is 10,000 years old, but for the last 7,000 years nothing has changed shape, that is considered a bad method or a bad result. They don't have answers, which is why they just keep adding more and more and more time because they don't want people realizing that carbon dating is mostly useless because when you start getting extreme errors, how can you trust the method? Just imagine testing one rock and getting one date and then months later testing the very same rock and getting a different result? That is not good science, so I am completely okay with Mel Gibson not believing in carbon dating because it is not a trusted method. Even radio dating is not a trusted method. If you used a ruler to measure and you kept getting different results every time you use that ruler, is it a good ruler? No. If you use a digital scale and it gave a different reading every time you tested the same item, is it a good scale? No it is not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
48:35 it wasn't three days later, it was "on the third day." People get this wrong all the time. If you really look into how the Jews were instructed to view the calendar (3 30day months followed by a solstice), because of reading the Torah, a new day starts when the sun sets so preparation day is Friday, the day before the Sabbath. The Christ was slain somewhat early in the evening/ late in the afternoon, on Friday, let's just say around 4:00 p.m., the family&followers all spend their Sabbath mourning, and, after the sun sets now, it is Sunday, Creation day, a day folks should celebrate, yet, just before the sun rises, which at that time of year might have been around 5:30 in the morning, the Christ was already gone. That is less than 48 hours! 1.5 days days 36 hours. It was on the 3rd day because Sunday and Friday are separated by the Sabbath. I can understand it being hard for people to believe in the resurrection, but this very same Word that spoke Creation used to walk with Adam. The very same Word that spoke Creation used to walk with Enoch, and even spoke a lot to Moses, Abraham, and a bunch of others. That very same Living Word came through the physical body to experience life the same way we do here in the physical world, having only 23 chromosomes which was verified by scientists who got a hold of a sample from the shroud. All Sciences point towards Creation, as all evolutionary "stories" have to start with some sort of imaginary lingo, because it's a theory. The Bible said we came from the soil; science has proven that every last mineral and just about every bacteria found in soil are found in every cell of our bodies. The Bible is proven by science, evolution is a lie because if we didn't have every organ every mental physical and spiritual ability that we have to adapt and survive, our species would have died off. How would a fish randomly have the ability to breathe on land and all of the sudden have a stomach to eat from the sand giving it enough strength to move around to get away from the water before the tide comes so that it can magically give itself the ability to reproduce with itself so that more can be present and more can just randomly change? If our brains didn't have memory, how would we survive? Google tells me that my shoulder muscle evolved from my oblique muscle but how would I have been able to feed myself and provide for myself if I wasn't able to raise my arm? Good thing the lord gave me everything I needed on day one when he made Adam
1