Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "MAGA Moron Exposes Herself As A Major Hypocrite" video.

You should probably come up with a better term than "pro crime." Also, I would advise you to not use whataboutism either. But then there wouldn't be anything of substance left to your post. At all. Maybe go read a book, or a couple hundred books, and learn to form and present coherent thoughts.
2
The auto-delete zapped your reply. Maybe try again, without using such mongoloid language? Also, try looking up "whataboutism." Regardless of how factual your original post is, it's still a logical fallacy, and therefore pointless.
2
@kenharrison4704 No one is saying it's untrue. That would be pointless, since it's whataboutism anyway. Can you not speak to the topic in this video at all? Do you have nothing to say about any of it? If you don't, then it would be better for you, me, and all concerned if--from now on--you just typed "Yabba dabba do." That would have more meaning, and would be a pleasure to read.
2
@kenharrison4704 It's whataboutism, which is a logical fallacy. I'll give you a relevant example of whataboutism, to help you understand what you're doing here. Now, say, in response to your first post, I wrote something like: "Oh yeah? Well Republican President Nixon had men break into the Watergate." See how that's a true statement? It's not even a half-truth, with lots of qualifying statements needed to explain it. Do you also see how it has nothing at all to do with your post, even though it was supposedly a response to it? And do you see how I'd be excusing the thing you wrote, even justifying it, and saying it's okay, because Nixon had men break into the Watergate: "Dems are bad; Repubs are bad. So what?" But I wouldn't be trying to say my side is bad. I'd be trying to deflect away from anything bad my side is doing. Regardless, I'd be saying my side is bad for the thing you mentioned, and your side is bad for the thing I mentioned. That's whataboutism, and why it's a logical fallacy. You set out to prove the other guy is hypocrite, but only show yourself to be one.
2
@kenharrison4704 Yeah. See, problem is now, I've seen your trolling posts up and down this video comment section. And you're using whataboutism in them too. So...yeah...it is whataboutism. And you either know it, and are just trolling, or too...shall we say: mentally absent...to understand--same thing really.
2
@kenharrison4704 Wow, Ken Harrison, you're doing whataboutism here, as well as in that other thread I saw of yours? How many times did you post here, and how many were whataboutisms? Do you trolls get paid for every logical fallacy you use?
2
"This is misinformation" I notice how you didn't say how it was misinformation, or even use punctuation.
2
@danialhillmann5374 "says the troll with nothing of value to actually say" Says the troll with nothing of value to actually say. (See what I did there?)
1
@stevecrabtree7091 "what that waist time" I have no idea what this means. Even if I take into account that you misspelled "waste," it still doesn't make sense.
1
I know a good joke: A bear and rabbit were taking a...you know...in the woods. (You know this one?)
1
@bl4ckkn1g8t5 Leftists tend to be educated. They/we can, at the very least, Google the definition of a word in a second. MAGA, on the other hand, gets a lot of words wrong (e.g., gender, communism, socialism). Also, I notice how didn't offer your interpretation of what she meant by "surreal" here.
1
@bl4ckkn1g8t5 Regardless, we know how to use Google. But, please, enlighten me with your interpretation of how "surreal" Mastriano is.
1
@bl4ckkn1g8t5 In your post that was auto-deleted, you said Leftists didn't know the definition of "surreal." That would imply you did know the definition, and that the woman was right. Maybe you didn't mean to imply that? Maybe you just meant to insult leftists at every possible opportunity, whether it made any sense or not. You also obviously have a low estimate of your own intelligence, which you struggle to cover up, by always saying others are stupid: You've done it twice in this thread alone. If I am confused, it's only because trolls like you never allow the conversation to advance. You just spin your wheels. So are you going to say why this guy is surreal or not?
1