Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Trump FUMBLES Softball Question About His Christianity" video.

  1. As a Springsteen fan, I can understand how, if someone ran for the Presidency talking vaguely about him, it might catch my attention. But when asked what their favorite Springsteen album was, and they said "Born to Come on Home," I'd get more than a little worried. Later when they gassed a crowd, so they could take a picture in Asbury Park, holding a Springsteen poster upside down, I'd be done with them for sure. But even if I stayed, because they promised to replace the National Anthem with "Jungle Park," the very last straw would be when asked to talk about their favorite song, and they said, ""Thunder Drive" was the best song ever: So let's deport everyone from Jersey."
    4
  2. You're assuming all Christians are MAGA. Not true. And you're assuming to know what all Christians are like, personally. That's impossible. You're generalizing with bigotry and prejudice.
    2
  3. Not all Christians support Trump.
    2
  4. "Antichrist" is only mentioned six times in the Bible. Three of those are in a single epistle, 1 John; and one in 2 John: All of those use the term as a plural (antichrists). The other two are in Thessalonians; those have the term as a singular. It is not a proper noun, i.e., a name in the Bible. It means anyone who is against Jesus teachings. The modern Antichrist idea comes from religious dogma in the early church, which Nostradamus later took up. You just substituted the word and rearranged the verses you quoted.
    1
  5. That's not thinking. It's belief.
    1
  6. A fact is something you can prove. And since you can't prove a negative, then you're unable to prove there is no God. Best that can be said is science doesn't need God to explain anything.
    1
  7. @randyt3558 You can't prove that. It would be impossible. That's a meaningless statement.
    1
  8.  @warrensmith8161  I didn't say I could. Nor am I a Christian. So none of that changes your meaningless statement. Try not deflecting next time.
    1
  9.  @randyt3558  Since you were the one to bring up Santa, the burden of proof is on you to prove your statement. And since you can't prove a negative, your statement is meaningless too.
    1
  10.  @randyt3558  See, when you claim something (as you did: "Santa is not real"), it's then up to you to prove it. And since you weren't really talking about Santa, and have to prove a negative (which can't be done), I'd say it's impossible for you to do so.
    1
  11.  @warrensmith8161  Calling Christians (people you've never met) fake is one thing, and that's what I'm arguing against. But I said nothing about Christianity, itself. Are you aware you used the word "fake" four times there? Seem kind of obsessed.
    1
  12. Don't all people are the same as one person.
    1
  13. At best, the Revelation is a vision, not to be taken literally.
    1
  14.  @ItsMeBT23  "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD" (Isaiah 55:8). Don't be so sure you, as a finite being, can understand what an infinite being wants, or thinks. Even the Bible says you can't. Know why? Because that would make you equal to God, which is blasphemy--besides being impossible.
    1
  15.  @ItsMeBT23  I reject Paul. He murdered Christians, didn't teach one thing from the Gospels, and set himself equal to Jesus. So no Timothy letter for me. You still don't get it: YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND GOD; you do not speak for God; and you certainly can't claim God sent the message to you that the Revelation is about Trump. It's absurd. Are you trolling?
    1
  16.  @ItsMeBT23  No. I am not a MAGAt. I see you're not above assuming things about people. Makes me wonder how much you assume about the Bible.
    1
  17.  @ItsMeBT23  Paul is not God. So my rejection of Paul is not a rejection of God. You do a lot of blasphemy. Also, "Satan" is the Hebrew word for "adversary." It was an improper noun (not a name) in the Old Testament. Christian Bishops in the Middle Ages added a mythology to Jesus, giving God an Adversary. So there's no such thing as Satan. Oh, and you don't get to say what offends Jesus, because you aren't Jesus.
    1
  18.  @ItsMeBT23  Here's what Jesus said about your so-called "End times." "But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father" (Matt. 24:36). You claim to know what even Jesus doesn't know.
    1
  19. "Antichrist" is only mentioned six times in the Bible. Three of those are in a single epistle, 1 John; and one in 2 John: All of those use the term as a plural (antichrists). The other two are in Thessalonians; those have the term as a singular. It is not a proper noun, i.e., a name in the Bible. It means anyone who is against Jesus teachings. The modern Antichrist idea comes from religious dogma in the early church, which Nostradamus later took up.
    1
  20. You can't prove a negative. So you're unable to prove there is no God. It's best to just say science has no need of God to explain anything.
    1
  21. I don't know that I'd say he's good. It's just very few people call him on it.
    1
  22. Both of you are speaking about people you don't know. Are you aware of that? @clivejules6175 @remnant1496
    1