Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on ""Reverse Racism" Debunked Over Fox News Story" video.

  1. The place discussed in the video is privately owned. It gives a place for (as they termed it) POC--people of color--to live. Those people would need to be immigrants, or from such a situation that they would appreciate not having unaccompanied white people around. That's right, white people can go there. Fox even said that, but then glossed over it. So white people aren't barred from entering. Since it's privately owned, and not run by the university or the government, it can have whatever rules it wants. That's why you don't see a lot immigrants, fresh off the boat, so to speak, living in the suburbs, in gated communities. That's why people who live in ghettos aren't members of elite country clubs--or even why there are elite country clubs. If you went to another country (for whatever reason) to go to school, and found there to be a lot of hostility against you based on the color your skin, then wouldn't you be glad to find a place where you wouldn't be attacked in bed, say, in the middle of the night, because of your skin color?
    9
  2.  @Dante-tk7gb  It's not racist to call out racism, any more than it's criminal to say someone committed a crime.
    1
  3.  @Dante-tk7gb  Derp, indeed, since I have no idea where you're getting this slander/defamation thing from. If you have a point, you should state it. That way someone won't have to ask you what you're talking about. Oh, and my original point (in the post above) still stands.
    1
  4.  @aylbdrmadison1051  "It would only be needed if all white people were racist." It's needed because SOME white people are racist. And they tend to be very vocal about it, and often violent.
    1
  5.  @rasheedjamal9091  Yes. I never thought of it that way. Well said.
    1
  6.  @courtney-rw8ch  No one. Bl4ck Kn1g8t there is a regular troll here.
    1
  7.  @soltier8965  Interesting point. But then again...not really. Those stores refused to serve black people. So black people couldn't enter, even when accompanied by a white person. Here, in this story, white people can enter. They just can't be left unaccompanied by someone who doesn't live there. See? Not at all alike. It was almost a good try, though. I had to stop and think for almost a full second.
    1
  8.  @lesgilbert50  "Left are the most racist people I know of, both black and white." If you believe that, then you're starting with an incorrect assumption. And everything else you think, that requires that assumption, will also be incorrect. First, "The Left" is not a single entity. When this name is referred to, it usually comes with a set of already established, understood personal characteristics, like you'd give to a single person you know. But you aren't talking about a single person. Nor are you talking about people you know. That's why this is wrong, just from the start. Then you claim the person who replied to you is "trying to twist the definition to fit your narrative. Crap this this is going to tear this country apart if it is allowed to continue without being confronted." So you then shrink the whole Left into one person, after you had accepted the Left to be a group with all the same characteristics, none of which you could know, but you somehow automatically know. But instead of group, it's a single person you're responding to for the first time anywhere, online. Yet this person is twisting and tearing the country apart. See how this incorrect assumption was based on a starting incorrect assumption? See how you're assigning singular characteristics to a group, as if you knew the single person, but can't possibly know all the group? And how then you reverse that, and give all the group characteristics to a person, who can't possibly represent the entire group? So, as you said, I'm not buying your definition.
    1
  9. Besides the usual Rebel HQ trolls, videos about race always pull them out of the woodwork.
    1