Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Watch How Quickly This Conservative BS Get Destroyed" video.

  1. Maybe an adjective? As in, a MAGA person--modifies a noun. But, yes, MAGA is how they identify themselves. It's plural, but singular, since they're all the same, and have an orange Papa Smurf messiah.
    3
  2. @Kracken Agate, I get what you're saying, and you have a point. However, you're not fixing the problem that you acknowledged is there. In fact, you're making it worse. When approximately half the country doesn't vote, then the people's will isn't heard; and, therefore, isn't reflected in government. And that means we get "white dudes in their 80's." You can't fix a problem by doing nothing.
    2
  3. What kind of hat did you pull that whataboutism from?
    2
  4. You mean Nazi soldiers? There were a lot of citizens who weren't soldiers, who went to the rallies, and ratted out their neighbors. I Googled your claim, but didn't find anything. So, yeah, need your source. You should really provide that kind of thing when you claim something.
    2
  5.  @starflakey  Ah yes, I see your meaning. Yes, they identify themselves as MAGA. :)
    2
  6. Yep. "Love one another." That's Christianity, or it should be. Pretty simple, really.
    1
  7. That doesn't really change anything.
    1
  8. You know-nothing bozo! That work for ya? :P
    1
  9. Whataboutism should be a crime.
    1
  10.  @hisokamorow3756  Then aren't you sneezing all the time when you're alone?
    1
  11. Language evolves. And people who use such pronouns aren't changing anything...for you, at least. Matter of fact, your life shouldn't be altered in the slightest.
    1
  12. Another whataboutism from you, @Ken Harrison. Posted at about the same time too.
    1
  13. *Dyed. You know people dye their hair, right? It's a thing.
    1
  14. @Teri Rea. You know you're looking at only the literal interpretation of the Bible, which I bet you don't agree with, but still use like it's the only way. Maybe there's another interpretation? For example: The Bible says God is everything, having made everything in his own image. So, then, God wouldn't be a singular entity, but everything. Right? That would explain what loving God means: loving everything. That would explain God's will: whatever happens. And humanity's free will: whatever we contribute to whatever happens. So the "deaf ear" from prayer (which you can't possibly know is deaf, even from a literal interpretation), would be the incorporation of our contribution to whatever happens--which doesn't always work out the way we want. And diseases and suffering would just be part of the natural order of things, i.e., science--which doesn't really care what you believe. In fact, beliefs are superfluous, in this interpretation.
    1