Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Trump Bombshell Blows Lid Off January 6th Hearings" video.

  1. For everyone saying "click bait," and/or asking where the bombshell is: She said in the video that Hope Hicks (aka Ho Pics) has testified to the January 6th committee. She said that Ho was one of the few hired by Trump, who stuck with him the whole time. She said that Ho even worked with Faux News, and supervised its coverage of Trump. So Ho is a trusted, reliable source (within the Trump circle) of all things Trump. And now she has testified. That's the bombshell.
    4
  2.  @why1968  "Do your own research clown Google is free" First, I say "whatever" to your MAGA mantra. Secondly, and the reason I'm commenting here: Google is not research. Reading what confirms your bias is not research. I know you MAGA people want to sound smart, to cover up your own intellectual illiteracy, but actual research never ever uses confirmation bias.
    3
  3. What is the speed of smell? Pretty sure that's instantaneous. Right? Once you smell it you smell it; and if you don't, you don't. Either way, I find it weird that you consider this lost time, then proceed to comment on the lost time...which causes you to lose more time. I dunno. Maybe get over it?
    3
  4.  @why1968  "And by the way we both know YouTube and google lean left with fact checkers sooooo" Wait. You earlier suggested people use Google for their "research." And you're on YouTube right now.
    2
  5. I was thinking the same thing, especially with the way Trump pronounces her name in the clips in this video.
    2
  6. Yeah...no, there's no Blue Anon. There's a Q anon though. And they're the one who deal in "idiotic ideas and conspiracies." That's what's called "accusation in a mirror." It's projection, only much worse. Pretty lame too.
    2
  7.  @jpaxonreyes  Thank you. That's the bombshell here, or that's how I interpreted it. Despite the massive turnover in the Trump administration (as the video says), Hope stuck with him. She oversaw all his tweets, was a major player on Fox News--which also supported Trump, and now she's testifying. Was it that hard for these other people to figure out? I guess it wasn't spelled out, with a big flashing arrow pointing to it. But I think they would still troll the comment section, no matter what the video said.
    2
  8. I find it weird that people find it weird we're still talking about what Trump has done (and is being investigated for), is doing (in his rallies and lies about the election being stolen), and will do (in his possible running again for the Presidency, or just endorsing lunatics).
    2
  9. Denial is not just a river in Egypt.
    2
  10.  @why1968  "Better Putin than Pelosi ALL MF DAY LONG!" Then you're a traitor.
    1
  11.  @why1968  "Point being conservatives are scrutinized on both these social platforms." MAGA is scrutinized because they do things worthy of scrutiny. For example: Trump took home (what was it) 11-15 boxes of material that NO PRESIDENT was supposed to take home; Herschel Walker claims to be against abortion, but paid for one of the mothers of his children to have an abortion; Ron DeSantis pulled a political stunt, in which he tricked legal immigrants onto a plane, and flew them to Martha's Vineyard...oh, and he wore pristine, white go-go boots to a flood aftermath, to make it look like he was wading through flood water, when all he really did was stop emergency flood recovery for his photo op. The list goes on and on. MAGA does awful stuff every.single.day. That's why they're in the news--which you call being scrutinized. Pretty sure you're the one who needs to "keep up."
    1
  12. Pretty sure there's a line...behind me, I might add. :)
    1
  13. The blowing the lid off part probably referred to Hope testifying before the January 6th committee. Just that: her testifying. There was nothing really philosophical in this. And if you only got halfway through, then that's kinda on you. I watched the entire thing.
    1