Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Trump: SHUT UP about egg prices" video.

@user-x4u6l It's the CIVICUS watchlist, true. But it is a "human rights watchlist." We're right alongside Serbia and Congo for "loss of freedoms."
14
@kpm7727 Ya didn't prove anything: just claimed something. But ya gave an example of not accepting accountability. That's the score.
9
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub The person just asked for proof, the burden of which is on the person who made the claim: the OP, who is the one who needs to do better. But then so do you, because ya could've found the proof too. Aren't really interested in proof though, huh? Just celebrating that others are hurting. The absence of empathy is called psychopathy.
6
@Js59083 Don't start that. Ya can't even get the part about the republic correct. Our representatives govern as a Constitutional Federal Republic. We elect people to represent us: That's called Representative Democracy. And we have been electing representatives for the entire history of our nation.
3
@shad0wCh8ser What's the list called? Can't find it.
2
@kpm7727 What a total sellout and apologist ya are. Do they even pay ya to do it? It's sickening. Now way would I stoop that low, as to lie and defend someone, for nothing, without even getting paid. And no way could they pay me enough.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub "Please look it up or you are just a troll. See how that works? Do better." The burden of proof is on the person who made the claim: the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried looking it up. I did find that "farming dependent counties voted overwhelmingly" for him this time, at 78%; and farmers who voted for him are feeling the pain now. But found nothing on how many farmers voted for him, even though that's what I searched for. Personally, I find anyone who celebrates another person's pain and misfortune to be the lowest of the low. And if they can't even prove what they claim, but are talking out of their as...hats, then they're KnowNothingBozos too.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub "look it up." The burden of proof is on the person who made the claim: the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried looking it up. I did find that "farming dependent counties voted overwhelmingly" for him this time, at 78%; and farmers who voted for him are feeling the pain now. But found nothing on how many farmers voted for him, even though that's what I searched for. It's not up to anyone else to do the OP's work for them. Personally, I find anyone who celebrates another person's pain and misfortune to be the lowest of the low. And if they can't even prove what they claim, then they're KnowNothingBozos too.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub "look it up." The burden of proof is on the person who made the claim: the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried looking it up. I did find that "farming dependent counties voted overwhelmingly" for him this time, at 78%; and farmers who voted for him are feeling the pain now. But found nothing on how many farmers voted for him. It's not up to anyone else to do the OP's work for them. Personally, I find anyone who celebrates another person's pain and misfortune to be the lowest of the low. And if they can't even prove what they claim, then they're even lower.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub "look it up." The burden of proof is on the person who made the claim: the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried looking it up. I did find that "farming dependent counties voted overwhelmingly" for him this time, at 78%; and farmers who voted for him are feeling the pain now. But found nothing on how many farmers voted for him. It's not up to anyone else to do the OP's work for them. Personally, I find anyone who celebrates another person's pain and misfortune to be the lowest of the low. And if they can't even prove what they claim, then they're even lower.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub The burden of proof is on the person who made the claim: the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried to verify it. I did find that "farming dependent counties voted overwhelmingly" for him this time, at 78%; and farmers who voted for him are feeling the pain now. But found nothing on how many farmers voted for him. Personally, I find anyone who celebrates another person's misfortune to be empty of empathy, the term for which is psychopathy.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub They asked for proof. The burden of proof is on the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried to verify it, to do the OP's work for them. I did find that "farming dependent counties voted overwhelmingly" for him this time, at 78%; and farmers who voted for him are hurting. But found nothing on how many farmers. Personally, I find anyone who celebrates another person's misfortune to be devoid of empathy, the term for which is psychopathy.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub The burden of proof is on the person who made the claim: the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried to verify it. I did find that "farming dependent counties voted overwhelmingly" for him this time, at 78%; and farmers who voted for him are hurting now. But found nothing on how many farmers voted for him. Far as I can tell, the OP's claim is empty and unverified. And the rest of ya, being w/o empathy, laugh and celebrate, and use ad hominems for anyone asking for proof.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub The burden of proof is on the person who made the claim: the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried, and found that "farming dependent counties overwhelmingly" chose him this time, at 78%; and farmers who chose him are hurting. But found nothing on how many farmers. So I take the OP's claim to be unverified.
1
@DescartesStrollsIntoAPub The burden of proof is on the person who made the claim: the OP @Jesse-v7h. I tried, and found that "farming dependent counties overwhelmingly" chose him this time, at 78%; and farmers who chose him are hurting. But found nothing on how many farmers. In other words, the OP is fulla cowpies.
1
@kpm7727 This is very simple. No rebuttal is possible. He said he would lower the prices on day one. The Dems said he couldn't. But he doubled down, tripled, quadrupled, over and over: claiming he would. Then he posted "shut up about the egg prices." Ya go no leg to stand on. There's no way to twist it.
1