Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "How Trump WON young men in 2024" video.

@tesladrew2608 And how many of those negative voices said that? Who did, exactly? Joe didn't, and neither did Harris, Obama, or any Dem President. Liberals, by definition, accept behavior that's different from their own. So whoever those people are, they weren't liberals.
5
He didn't cry. And he gained most of them back. You're just wanting to dismiss him without thinking.
5
If you're toxic, you're toxic; if you're not, you're not. And if you are, then such young men ALREADY RESENT the people, without them calling the young men toxic. Your cause and effect is all messed up.
4
Agreed. A good while back, a researcher into wolves defined the "Alpha wolf" as being aggressive, cruel, with constant displays of such. Years later, they admitted their research was flawed. A pack is really a family unit, similar to a tribe. And the leader (the Alpha) of the family unit is the father. And the father isn't any of those things. So you are the Alpha in your family. It's really the Omega wolf, the lowest on the totem pole, the crazy one who gets rejected by the tribe, and becomes "the lone wolf." That's what toxic masculinity is.
4
No one is calling all men that, only those who are. If they don't want to be called that, then they need to pick themselves up by their bootstraps, man-up, and stop being so angry that the rest of us aren't in the Stone Age.
3
If that's what they are, then that's what they are; if not, then they aren't. If they don't want to be called that, then they should be something else.
3
Caring about them? You think anyone gets cared about? What country do you think this is? We fight for rights: That's true. But the only caring is for the unborn or people living in other countries; so no one has to really care, actually put time into them. If you cared, then you'd care for others, no matter how you perceive them treating you or your "issues."
2
@IntensePeppers They didn't say it was mentioned in the video. And it obviously is real. There can be a toxic (or negative) side of everything, including masculinity. Didn't really think this through, huh?
2
@jjrbarnett "no amount of pondering" Said the person who obviously doesn't ponder anything. And I do NOT agree that she was a "poor candidate." You're projecting again.
2
Yeah, I stopped watching his movie reviews. He has really gone off the deep end. He was always teetering on the edge.
2
@cinemapigeon4898 Yeah, that "the message" thing got really old. You're right: It got to where it wasn't about movies, but about his "message," which is really just the message of the right.
2
Let's hear you say something intelligent. I'm not picky. Anything intelligent at all!
2
@LutherusPXCs "a lot of it is culture." How is it the culture? What culture?
1
@youcef4593 You already responded to me with this same thing. And I replied back. I'm not going to have multiple back and forths here.
1
@ Thanks for responding two months later. I do get to decide what I think toxic means. Just as you do. If you didn't get to decide, then I'd possibly concede that I lack that power as well. But since you do, then I do.
1
"Mostly just sneers about how "toxic" and "privileged" they are." No one is calling anyone that who isn't that. It's not "all men" who are called that. You're way off base here. Time to stop assuming you know what's going on.
1
The left doesn't hate men. I'm a man: a lot of us are. And we aren't afraid of anyone for anything. So that doesn't help at all. Sounds like an excuse to dismiss something without thinking.
1
@tesladrew2608 He does talk about it all the time. Delbert is just trolling, with his Trump profile picture.
1
Not all young men, only 56%. The other 44% weren't repelled. So the Dems did appeal to them.
1
@SteveJ-o3o So using emojis is considered "strong"? That's sad. I can't imagine Seal team 6 posting multiple laughing emojis, or an MMA fighter, or people who aren't just physically strong, but mentally, emotionally, spiritually.
1
@SadGuy321 "only 30-40% of American men actually" Yes, but you can have a percentage of another percent. If you look for 50% of a starting value, then you can still find 50% of that new value...which is what I did there.
1
@SadGuy321 44% of male voters voted Harris. That's almost half, just a few percent behind DonaldMcCheese. That rock in the dark is yours.
1
@SadGuy321 44% of the male vote went to Harris. That's not a rock in the dark. That's a fact.
1
@SadGuy321 44% of the male vote went to the Dems. I'd call that good.
1
@SadGuy321 44% of the males went to the Dems. That's not as big a shift as some would like you to believe.
1
@SadGuy321 Sorry, but 56% is not a "cultural shift," especially when young voters overall went blue with 52%.
1
@ImCaptainCabbage Literally? How'd they do that? Who did it? "They" doesn't specify. I guarantee you Harris didn't, or Walz, or any Dem senator or house representative.
1
She lost because she didn't go on Rogan? It, alone, would allow "her to connect with this demographic"? Really? The 56% of young men who voted for DonaldMcCheese would never vote for any Dem. They are already "all in" to their side, and they aren't switching. Nothing she could have said on his show would change that.
1
@jjrbarnett That's not at all true. You're projecting onto him what YOU are actually doing. You did it right there when you referred to him. I don't think anyone misread your post. You're clear and obvious.
1
@jjrbarnett Oh really? "David does not know how men think outside of political entertainment." And, "Packman doesn't associate with decision-making men or hard labor. He prefers an academic type of company. He'll never know why." And, "Kamala was a poor candidate." And, to me, "type whatever you want." ALL you have done is insult people. If your "opinion" is insulting, it's an insult. And yeah, you don't come across as a deep thinker. That's not my fault.
1
@jjrbarnett They're insults. An insult by any other name is still an insult. Besides, only 56% of young men voted for DonaldMcCheese. That means 44% didn't. That means your initial statement of "young men identifying" with him is wrong. Barely half do.
1
@jjrbarnett Also, I'm tired of you. It's like talking to a troglodyte. Muting you now.
1
If 56% voted for DonaldMcCheese, then 44% didn't. So that latter group DID find their needs met by the culture, or at least not rejected by it, or were able to deal with it without sacrificing their morality. That 56% group cannot be reached, at least at this point; and perhaps they never could. Their masculinity isn't being threatened, just what they believe is masculinity: 44% don't agree with them. They are really looking to lash out, and need an excuse. Why are they wanting to lash out? Because society advanced and left them behind. While we aren't all that advanced, they're in the Stone Age. And they're mad because we aren't. I don't see how to change the fact that they're "a couple cans short of a six-pack, truly gone fishing, Alpo between their ears," except for medication maybe and shock treatment.
1
Fewer emojis, more thinking. The "code" has nothing to do with what you said. You just did a straw man. And you probably know that. Just need some attention? Poor thing!
1
@jethrotool4828 Or maybe just analyze something without bias? Think you can do that? Try it.
1
@jethrotool4828 Is this your first analysis? Because that's not one. To analyze something, you have to examine it without bias. You clearly have nothing but bias. To examine something, follow the scientific method. You probably don't know what that means. Look it up. Also, answer all 5 basic journalism questions. Again, look it up.
1
@jethrotool4828 What am I supposed to give you my opinion on? I've told you every time the ways you're wrong. So, I don't know or think you're right. The "code" was defined in the video. You're just trolling, aren't you? Just going to mute you. Tired of wasting my time.
1
Being intelligent requires intellectual exercise, just as being strong and vigorous requires physical exercise. A whole lot of people, maybe 100 million Americans, can barely walk, metaphorically speaking. It's not just the lack of exercise, i.e., reading, learning, thinking; rather they are metaphorically lying in bed for decades.
1