Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Trump's victory keeps SHRIVELING to TINY 1.4%" video.

  1. You don't know they did. You believe they did. If you knew, you'd know, because you have facts. You don't. You're just being the same as the people we saw in 2020 through even today, who still can't admit that Joe won. Still! Even though they got nothing. Have some dignity.
    13
  2. And the space lasers.
    11
  3.  @ryant2568  You mean taxes? You realize that's what taxes are, and what they do, their purpose. Right? To give to other people? You'll still be paying them, even with him. And they'll still be going to other people. It's just that, with him, the billionaires will get tax breaks.
    10
  4. Well, it doesn't change the fact that he won, but it matters because it wasn't the "mandate" they're claiming it is.
    10
  5.  @youtubestuff683  George Carlin begs to differ.
    9
  6.  @DissectGibberish  They did not. DonaldMcCheese got 1.4% more. That's the subject of this very video. It's in the title! The majority of the votes went to Kam and the other independent candidates, as an aggregate, not just to her.
    5
  7. What "history" are you talking about?
    4
  8.  @ryant2568  We have the freedom to vote for whomever we want, or to not vote. Every single citizen exercised their constitutional rights, then, whether you like their choice or not. And every citizen has the same right to complain about the outcome, as you have the right to complain about their choice.
    4
  9. No. Weren't you listening? The majority did NOT want him back. Some did, yes. But some Americans will always do...let's just saying questionable things. That doesn't mean it's indicative of "America" to do those things; rather, that America isn't a single entity: Everyone is different. And the majority voted against him.
    4
  10. Maybe you're just smelling your own capslock, sprinkled with emojis. He won by teeny tiny amount, not even the majority. Accept reality, until we find out that reality is something else. You aren't Spider-Man with a spider-sense. Have some dignity.
    3
  11.  @Bootmahoy88  They were not being dense. They wanted the OP to spell it out, because the OP was vague on purpose. You're still being vague, but you're almost there. Say it.
    3
  12. Buy what? The sneakers? Facts are facts, until we learn differently. Buying has nothing to do with facts.
    3
  13.  @jacobshort1881  No. The difference is 1.4%. Math is hard.
    3
  14. Well, yeah. That's what David meant by, "He didn't win the majority." Fortunately, we can vote for whomever we want in this country, or not vote at all.
    2
  15.  @ericv7720  No. We have the freedom here to do it or not; and if we do it, we can cast our vote for whomever we want.
    2
  16.  @chriscasperson5927  No, because they're "unalive." So they aren't disappointed. And you're assuming I didn't vote, or something, which I did. People have the freedom to choose. Period. Get it? Exclamation point! The only disappointment is people not respecting the freedom we all have to choose.
    2
  17.  @chriscasperson5927  I do get it. Nothing is flying over my head. What I'm failing to impart to you has to do with the very rights you claim to champion. People have the right to vote for whomever they choose, or to not vote. That is a right. Get it? And you're in favor of rights. They exercised their rights. I'll tell you something else: Speaking ill of how my grandparents and great grandparents see me, for not doing what YOU think I should do, even though I did it, is lower than the lowest thing you're claiming other people are doing. Really low: the complete absence of high ground. Youeff.
    2
  18.  @jacobshort1881  He was more popular than Kam by 1.4%. But those who voted against him were in the majority, just separated into different parties. He still won though. We Dems can admit that, unlike another major party in 2020, who still can't admit it 4 years later.
    2
  19. @klausschwab9828 Certainly had to do with the misinformation about that. Millions of people were misinformed, getting their "news" from memes, podcasts, forums. Never have so many been misinformed by so many.
    2
  20.  @jacobshort1881  I was talking about his win this time, as was the video. You didn't say that's what you were talking about, which is a point incongruent with the topic and title of the video. Sticking to the point is hard.
    2
  21. He did say Dems lost though. So you got nothing.
    1
  22. Depends on what you mean by "have questions." Sounds innocuous, but it likely isn't. I'm not going to believe in conspiracies, or deny that he won, based on nothing. That would make me exactly like those people of questionable intellectual capabilities we've been seeing since 2020. If you want to be Bluemaga, do it. I'm not. Waste of time. Best scenario is, like Mike Pillow, you believe you find some incontrovertible "evidence," with which you will...do what? You don't even have Pillow's money. And you're unlikely to find anything to start with. So it would be a waste. Accept what we know as reality, until we know something different.
    1
  23. The facts don't leave room for questions. Until those facts change, your questions are dubious and superfluous.
    1
  24.  @Jesu-hs8wb  That's just what DonaldMcCheese called her, and you're just parroting it without checking. In a list of the top 18 VPs in modern history, Kam came in at 11. So there were 7 more who were more unpopular than her. Learn to recognize when someone hyperbolizes with "in history," they are almost always factually incorrect.
    1
  25. In this country we have the freedom to vote, or to not vote; to stand for the pledge, or to not stand; to serve in the military or gov't, or to not serve. So you being disgusted by people exercising their freedom is NOT the win you believe it is.
    1
  26.  @ericv7720  I know what you're saying. And I'm saying no. Freedom is freedom. And forcing someone to vote against their will, for a candidate they don't want to vote for, is about as far from American as you can get. Regardless of what either of us think, the constitution is on my side. I think voting is mandatory is Australia. Maybe you should go there.
    1
  27.  @ericv7720  There you go. Have fun.
    1
  28.  @chriscasperson5927  No. We have the constitution right, the freedom to choose who we vote for, or to not vote. Every single citizen exercised their rights. It doesn't matter what YOU think of their choice. And they can complain, just as you have the freedom to complain about them. So, you give that up, and we can talk about them giving it up. Ready when you are.
    1
  29. We have the freedom to vote for whomever we want, or to not vote. Therefore, everyone...every single citizen of voting age, exercised their constitutional rights. It doesn't matter if you like their choice or not.
    1
  30.  @dominicdeshazo2285  The people who voted for someone else, besides the person you wanted, or who just abstained, were exercising their freedom, as guaranteed by the constitution. Their freedom is equal to yours, not beneath or above. You don't have to care, or like it: That's beside the point.
    1
  31.  @dominicdeshazo2285  True, you never actually said they couldn't. You just said they were foolish, and their decisions were bad. But their decisions are protected the constitution. You're saying that's bad? Foolish? Sounds like a deficiency of clear, logical thinking on your part. If you're against the constitution, and the freedoms it supports, then maybe that's on you.
    1
  32.  @jacobshort1881  Still TrollingRightAlong with that, huh? See, that number you gave has nothing with the supposed mandate, which was only a 1.4% PopVote victory margin. The supposed mandate was about how much of the PopVote he won THIS TIME. And that is 1.4%. So it is not a mandate.
    1
  33. First, the "yays" (or do you mean "nays") didn't go to a single party, but to different candidates. Secondly, it would be a lot closer than 7:3, because that's a 4% difference. The difference between him and Kam was 1.4%; but in terms of all parties, with the majority being against him, we'd need like 4 factors, instead of 2; and you'd need to take into account what percentage those other parties got. That's why the people who were against him still lost. Right? You simplified it too much, and made a StrawMan.
    1
  34. He did win the popular vote, because "all others combined" were not from a single candidate. He didn't win the majority. That's the correct terminology.
    1
  35.  @jdm2102  He did, actually. Unless you're utilizing some philosophical definition of "winning."
    1
  36.  @konradd.4023  The turnout for Joe's 2020 was rare, an outlier. The turnout for 2024 was normal. Can't blame it on that. It's normal for over one-third of the pop to abstain. Your metaphors, while intriguing, especially the quote from Rocky 2, don't really matter. Whatever the reason(s), he won. We have to face that reality, or make excuses and let our minds run in conspiratorial-theory mode, just like them in 2020. Have some dignity.
    1
  37.  @konradd.4023  He did not win that way. As far as anyone can tell, he won fair and square. I don't like it either. But it's reality. Face it. Have some dignity.
    1
  38.  @MikeHarvey-ol7xr  No one knows the future, Nostradumas. We hope for the outcome we want. Welcome to the human race.
    1
  39.  @jacobshort1881  1.4%, non MathNerd.
    1
  40.  @jacobshort1881  Except the difference between '20 and '24 is not the subject at hand. And you didn't mention it. We were talking about what the video was talking about. So I didn't even know what math you were referring to, genius. You went off-topic, without saying so.
    1
  41.  @kenwhite6449  Multiple copies of the same emoji shows you are an intellectual, logical giant. Such hyper-intelligent supermen should already know what the house has accomplished. How odd. And even if they don't, they could easily look it up. Very odd. Also, the person you're talking to isn't house representative.
    1
  42. David, you have been appealing to people with logic. Please continue doing this, and ramp it up even. There are a lot of Dems in the comments who are in denial.
    1
  43.  @bambesfresser  The "pretending he was sharp" thing is really just more misinformation. I hesitate to say that, as I'm betting a conversation about it will go nowhere. He bombed the debate, but did awesome the very next day at a speech and the Q&A afterward. Part of the misinformation is undermining the so-called MSM.
    1
  44.  @bambesfresser  I never heard any pretending, from anyone, about his state, especially in the news. They went on and on about it. But the misinformation campaign would have you believe that didn't happen. That's my point. Everyone was living in an alternate reality, separate from the facts, and voted accordingly.
    1
  45.  @bambesfresser  The press did not pretend that. That's more misinformation. In fact, they went on and on about it. They hardly talked about anything concerning him.
    1
  46.  @bambesfresser  People were misinformed about what the press said about Joe. The press did NOT pretend he was sharp. They went on and on about it, hardly discussing anything else concerning him. Then, suddenly, everyone believes the opposite about the press. That's my point.
    1
  47.  @bambesfresser  Wow. I've tried writing like 5 replies. All deleted. Youtube has really gone to the dogs.
    1
  48.  @AmericanPulse69  "We knew yall would say that after 4 years of crying about Trump saying the exact same thing" The difference is, the politicians and the presidential candidate aren't saying it, just a bunch negativeIQ people in the comments. So that's all the difference in the world, making that a false equivalence.
    1
  49. What's the point? I have to ask because you didn't say.
    1
  50.  @ericv7720  And the quality of food will go down, thanks to what they want to do with the FDA. And people will lose health insurance. So the OP could get sick from the bad food, and have to pay out-of-pocket for medicine, while having less money. Cope, indeed.
    1
  51. Because the popVote has to be less than 0.6% for a recount, unless she pays for it with her own money, like DonaldMcCheese did; that or she sells sneakers and Bibles to pay for it. And it's "Kamala."
    1
  52.  @archivey-h8e  Yes, by a narrow amount. The mandate would happen if there was a landslide, and there wasn't one. He didn't even win the majority. The point isn't the winning, but the lack of a mandate, when Repubs claimed there was one: Of course, they also claimed DonaldMcCheese didn't lose in 2020, and still refuse to face that fact...to this day!
    1