Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Trump asked about Joe Rogan, completely falls apart" video.

  1. "This already didn't age well" Pakman explicitely said, "MY EXPECTATION IS...." He's not a prophet. He guessed. When you guess, you have, at best, a 50% chance of guessing incorrectly. I don't see how a guess can "age." But you aren't really here to display your logical, critical thinking.
    3
  2. "This aged badly" Pakman explicitely said, "MY EXPECTATION IS...." He's not a prophet. He guessed. When you guess, you have, at best, a 50% chance of guessing incorrectly. I don't see how a guess can "age," let alone "age badly."
    3
  3.  @Steve-cf7pz  You can't lie about the future. Seriously, think of what you're asserting. He said what his "expectations" were: That's a fancy word for guessing, in case you don't know. You can't lie about a guess that concerns what hasn't happened yet. There are no facts to lie about.
    3
  4. I didn't know any "independent" voters actually used the "TDS" cliche/conspiracy. How odd that you chose this time post, when there's one TrumpTroll after another. Maybe you can tell me what TDS is? No Trumpist will reply to that question. Let's see if you do.
    2
  5.  @pikengren1  "He gets it wrong most of the time" Gets what wrong? When? How? About what or whom? How can you reply as you did, without asking/answering any of those questions? "if you don't ask too many questions" That's YOU.
    2
  6. What is "Trump derangement syndrome"? I'd love to have one of you m@g@ts explain it. It must be a physical or psychological condition, right? So you must qualified to be able to diagnose it. Please, I'd love to hear your erudite dissertation.
    1
  7. I've been asking for years for one of you ClinicalScientistMagats to explain how you diagnose this syndrome. What is it, exactly? But after years of asking, not a single one of you has ever given an explanation. Surely that can't be because it was made up to dismiss all criticism. Right? All of you must be capable of the erudite dissertation needed to expound on this obviously genuine malady. Please, let's hear it.
    1
  8.  @TheMrboskie  That's what TrumpDerangementSyndrome is? "based on how you talk to people...learn how to be civil and have adult social skills and understanding"? That means every single TrumpSupporter has the syndrome then. That means people who aren't even talking about him have it. That means you have it with your "may not need an explanation of the blatantly obvious" passive-aggressive balderdash. That's obviously not what these people mean.
    1
  9.  @TheMrboskie  But none of that has anything to do with DonDonTheCon. And, if anything, it shows how his own supporters suffer from the so-called syndrome. Why don't you try again, and actually tell the truth.
    1
  10.  @TheMrboskie  "The point just went over your head." Then you didn't do a good job of explaining it. You also didn't distinguish between how his supporters do the things that you claim are evidence of it, and how Democrats do it, and how people who don't vote at all do it. I didn't expect your "syndrome" to actually be medically probable, because then actual doctors would be diagnosing people with it; but I expected something other than that load of cowpies. I'm honestly disappointed you couldn't do better. A 4th grader would have more imagination.
    1
  11.  @TheMrboskie  Now we're getting somewhere! Thank you. So Krauthammer wasn't just a psychiatrist: He was a CONSERVATIVE political columnist and commentator. He didn't coin the term for DonDon though: Esther Goldberg did, and he wrote about it in an op-ed. It's defined as "hatred of [DonDon] so intense that it impairs people's judgment." See how different that is from what you claimed? What you said had nothing to do with him, so therefore couldn't possibly be the syndrome about people's ostensible feelings for him. The reason why you didn't define it as it's actually defined is because it's so obviously illogical and fallacious. It so obviously is meant to dismiss all criticism of him, as being an actual psychological syndrome, which it isn't.
    1
  12.  @TheMrboskie  So Krauthammer wasn't just a psychiatrist: He was a CONSERVATIVE political columnist and commentator. He didn't coin the term for DonDon: Esther Goldberg did, and he wrote about it in an op-ed. It's defined as "hatred of [DonDon] so intense that it impairs people's judgment." See how different that is from what you claimed? What you said had nothing to do with him, so therefore couldn't possibly be the syndrome about people's ostensible feelings for him. The reason why you didn't define it as it's actually defined is because it's so obviously illogical and fallacious. It so obviously is meant to dismiss all criticism of him, as being an actual psychological syndrome, which it isn't.
    1
  13.  @TheMrboskie  "You know you're 100% wrong." Sorry, homey. He was a conservative, doing Op-eds for Fox and the like. He was also a psychiatrist for only 3 years. And Esther did coin it FOR Donny, as I said. He did it for Dubya, as you said, though. But she did it for him, then Krauthammer did a Conservative piece on it. WHY DIDN'T YOU LOOK THIS UP TO VERIFY IT? That's all you had to do.
    1
  14.  @budalicious3201  No he didn't. I don't know what multiple sources you're talking about. But since you already believe they are facts, nothing I can say will change your mind. So good luck with your alternative facts: I hope they're sufficiently euphoric.
    1
  15. And your comment is chock-full of confirmation bias. You aren't honestly, sincerely critiquing anything. What you're doing is a "misleading cry for attention." Poor baby. I hope the attention I gave you made you feel better.
    1
  16. "Misleading news like this should be punishable" This isn't news. It's a commentary channel. Do you not know how to identify what a fact is? Or how to distinguish it from a guess? He said, "It's my expectation...." That means it's his guess. So it's not him telling you a fact, because he's guessing about the future. Do you have to check your brain at the door, if you're a Trumpist? Certainly seems that way.
    1
  17.  @Steve-cf7pz  Can't really be "right or wrong," since both require a comparison to the facts. And there are no facts for the future, except in science: which this definitely isn't. What he said didn't happen. That's for sure. You got a 50/50 chance, at best, of predicting the future. See, that's why prophecy isn't real. Anything can seem "right or wrong" from hindsight, especially given your obviously high levels of confirmation bias. Sorry, I know you're not trying to be intellectual or logical here. If you were, you'd know all of this obvious stuff, without me having to spell it out. Go read a book. Learn something.
    1
  18.  @Steve-cf7pz  Neither, since both require you to be making a statement based on fact. (Look up the definitions. ALWAYS look up the definitions, especially if you think the definitions are obvious.) There are no facts about the future, except from science, which this definitely is not.
    1
  19.  @Steve-cf7pz  "A prediction doesn't have to be based on facts." I didn't say that. I said being right or wrong has to be based on facts, by definition. So look up the definitions for "right" and "wrong." You asked if Pakman was right or wrong, but fail to understand what those simple words mean. Being that unable to grasp simplicity, no wonder my logical reasoning sounds like a word salad to you.
    1
  20.  @Steve-cf7pz  So you're just going to ignore what I wrote? Maybe if I repeat it while you imagine me dancing to YMCA, you'll get it: I said being right or wrong has to be based on facts, by definition. So look up the definitions for "right" and "wrong." "You asked if Pakman was right or wrong." He was neither, because there are no facts when predicting the future, except from science. And there's no science here. IT'S FUN TO STAY AT THE YMCA!
    1
  21.  @Steve-cf7pz  "The FACT is it was over a hour. That means he was wrong." You can't know the future for a fact. That's the point. Do I need to throw paper towels at hurricane flood victims so you'll understand? Therefore, you can't be wrong about guessing the future, because being right or wrong is based on facts. Maybe you'd like to buy a Bible, or some sneakers, or NFT cards, or Ivermectin; how about a piece of my suit, or some cheaply made coins?
    1
  22.  @Steve-cf7pz  "Not sure what you don't understand." I'm not sure what YOU don't understand. Only so many ways I can say it. You asked if he was right or wrong. The definitions of "right" and "wrong" require you to be right about the facts, or wrong about the facts. There are no facts when a person predicts something. There are facts afterward. So WHEN he predicted what he did, there were no facts to be right or wrong about. I cannot spell it out any better than that. If you still don't get it, then you don't want to, or else you're more obtuse than a 120-degree angle.
    1
  23.  @Steve-cf7pz  "Not going back and forth with someone who can't accept reality." One last projection, huh? I couldn't agree more. Go read some books. Your IQ is obviously in the basement.
    1
  24.  @Steve-cf7pz  "I can admit my prediction was wrong." You still can't admit how "right" and "wrong" works though. I've already explained it. (I've also already muted you.) I think the biggest problem is you don't understand how time works. I could walk you through the Special and General Theories of Relativity, explain how there's no negative direction in time (which would also explain the concept of hindsight I've been laboring to clarify for you), but you wouldn't get it. So, enjoy the cowpie between your ears. I have had enough of you.
    1
  25. "The TDS is strong with this one..." What is TDS? No Trumpist will explain it. I'd love to get your erudite, medical explanation on this obviously (and necessarily) physical and psychological condition.
    1
  26. The TrumpTrolls descended on the comments in force. I'd pay real money to speak to one of them who was actually intellectual, logical, and capable of critical thinking. I've never seen such a unicorn.
    1
  27. He explicitly said, "My expectation is...." He guessed. He's not a prophet. When you guess, you have at least a 50% chance of guess incorrectly. He wasn't "wrong," since there was no facts known when he said it.
    1
  28.  @Indust12349  "most viewed podcast in history. Nice try." You know how long "history" is, what all it encompasses? Hint: ALL OF IT. It absolutely was not the most viewed podcast in history. Look it up. It's not even the most viewed episode for that show. "Nice try."
    1
  29.  @Indust12349  But it isn't the "number 1 podcast episode in history." You can look this up. When I do, I find the top best individual episodes of 2024: "Possible" Trevor Noah on the Future of Entertainment and AI; and Marshawn Lynch With Shannon Sharpe on Club Shay Shay. And beating out Elon with Rogan for views: "Secrets to Thriving Relationships."
    1
  30.  @Indust12349  The most viewed podcast episode ever, beating out Muskyboy (who beat out DonDon), is "Secrets to Thriving Relationships."
    1
  31. Pakman guessed. He explicitly said, "My expectation is...." That's not derangement. It's admitting he doesn't know the future. The derangement, as always, lies with DonDon's supporters, who show up here like a troll tidal wave.
    1
  32. That's because they're an army of TrumpTrolls. So a ton of what you're seeing here aren't from people who are sincere.
    1
  33. You saw all the other TrumpTrolls like you, then. And deduced, what? That they were all sincere, honest watchers of the show? And not one of hundreds of you m@g@ts who came here to spew garbage?
    1