Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Why Are the Right Wing Terrorists Being Called "Militia?"" video.

  1.  @patmahinie5728  "Hi Laurajean Wullson, I come here to try and mitigate the damage. Mr. Pakman is intentionally trying to anger you so you will fight his battle. We need to treat others fairly and Mr. Pakman is dehumanizing people in order to provoke civil unrest." May be a troll. But this is too rich. I have to comment. So Pakman is trying to rile up, and anger his base, so they'll fight? He's dehumanizing, and provoking civil unrest. Okay.... First, you're thinking of Trump, and the other right-wing mouthpieces, who have been blamed by the January 6 insurrectionists, for their crimes. Has anyone ever, will anyone ever blame Pakman for any such thing? Secondly, this is an independent program, not MSM. People who listen to Pakman are intelligent, most likely well read. They use critical thinking. Pakman encourages critical thinking, not violence. Finally, so I very much doubt you're here to "mitigate." You saw something that spoke of right-wing "militia" as terrorist. Yes? So you came here to...what? Troll? Maybe, or just defending your tribe with projection.
    5
  2. There's the explanation I was looking for. Good job.
    2
  3.  @kimberly8695  You make a good point. So, they aren't really vigilantes, because they're committing crimes (potentially), and they aren't militia, since no government backs them. What are they? The commenter Ripper suggested "grown men playing GI Joe with their guns." And he pointed out her many (most/all?) of these groups want "to start a Civil War and over throw the Government." If that is true, then why does our government allow them? And could there be any other explanations? I mean, really, we can't get a clear understanding of these people. They won't tell us the truth, and no one else can tell us about them. So what's up with them?
    2