Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Obese caller identifies as thin" video.

Okay, that's pretty funny. Good job.
3
@Luke-kv6qf "Transracial" (one word) refers to adoptions, and means placing a child who is of one race or ethnic group with adoptive parents of another race or ethnic group. So yes, I support it.
2
@pinkroses Wow. You just did a copy and paste on two consecutive replies. "This man (in his example) wants to identify as a thin man, not just physically, but he wants to be treated the way thin muscular men are treated in society." He didn't say that. Nor did he imply it. That's you trying to turn a cow pie into an apple pie. It also still misses the point: His example was to belittle transgenders. He said he used it to show how both his example and transgender (which he didn't say exactly, didn't use the word, but it was obvious) don't make sense. What you have there is a false equivalence, an attempt at reduction to absurdity, meant to belittle transgenders, which is the new kind of prejudice and persecution. It is an attempt to use the language of acceptance to actually demonize people, instead of accepting them. No one is fooled.
2
@Luke-kv6qf "you're giving one definition." I looked it up before replying to you. It's the only actual definition. What you're referring to are bad-faith arguments, trying to belittle transgender people. What's worse, such bad-faith people use a word that already has a definition. It would be like naming your newly established city New York, and calling the new state New York. So stop. That's not what "identify as/with" means. It's not what transracial means.
1
@Luke-kv6qf "Are you against transracial rights??" This illustrates your bad faith argument, and your reason for doing it. You're equating things that aren't connected. And you're saying they are, then saying anyone against it is equivalent to people being against transgender. You're being obvious. Definitions are not just social constructs. They are established. You can't say a baseball bat is an atom. And you can't say a highway is a tree. What's more, you can't say it just because you don't know the definition, or want to make up your own, to further some prejudicial point.
1
@Luke-kv6qf "What do you have against transracial people?? What's with the hate??" You keep doing that. In so doing, you show that you aren't really against hate, but are mocking those who are. "if definitions aren't social constructs, then how can we say transwomen are women??" I didn't say definitions aren't social constructs. I said, "Definitions are not just social constructs." But I see now you have no sincere interest in this, and just want to troll. Sad and pathetic.
1
@goodlookingman4489 "let’s make this simple for you Can a full blood blond Swede identify as as a black man?" Oh, YOU are going to make it simple for ME? You who asked that question, after I've already explained this premise, are going to just start the whole dumb, obviously bad-faith process again? You wrote this on another thread: "So which prison should a biological male who identifies as a woman be sent to ?" So you obviously want to make this an indirect belittling of transgender people.
1
Why do these people sound like they're on their 39th beer in a row? Or that they've been up for five days straight? Yeah, by saying "identify as" and "see no difference," he's talking about transgender. He has obviously done no reading at all on it, has zero empathy, and is galvanized by right wing talking points. And he's yet another conservative who suffers from the Dunning-Kruger Effect: He believes he nailed that point, and dropped the mic.
1
@pinkroses "His point wasn’t just about bodies. If he feels deep down he was supposed to be a thin man and is in the wrong body...." Read that until you see it.
1
@pinkroses "People just want to interpret things in whatever way reinforces their own beliefs and have no interest in anything else so I don’t really care." Thank you for admitting you think that way. Now back to the underside of the troll bridge with you.
1