Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "I would gleefully watch all progressive media die" video.

  1. This is the same troll who commented earlier that David wasn't intelligent or articulate. Is this a hobby for you, TrollingRightAlong on progressive media? You insincerity is extremely transparent.
    7
  2. That's because you wouldn't read a book about critical thinking. Emojis are more your speed.
    7
  3. Like what? Why didn't you give any examples? Also, whataboutism.
    4
  4.  @OldManYellsAtClouds  The OP is trolling all over these comments.
    4
  5.  @itsjustme373  Spelt is the UK spelling.
    3
  6.  @dpej5167  Good catch! I didn't see that. I was just looking at the reply, not the original post.
    2
  7.  @itsjustme373  Spelt or spelled is acceptable UK spelling.
    1
  8.  @Cristian-g9v6x  He is obviously intelligent AND articulate. You can hear it in his commentary: what he says and how he says it. He wrote a book about teaching logical thinking to children. That's not just about logic, but about teaching logic.
    1
  9. It's basic insecurity on their part. Their world view hangs by the thread of the assumption that they are intelligent, DonaldMcCheese is more honest than Honest Abe, and Dems are wrong about everything. So anyone who threatens to cut that thread, by being a Dem who is correct and/or intelligent must be attacked, since that would decimate their point of view. They could choose to learn facts, so they would actually be as smart as they believe they already, naturally are; but that would require them to admit that they aren't naturally intelligent, and would emphasize just how far behind they are, how wrong they have been for so very long. It's easier to just say, "Nuh uh."
    1
  10. They are insecure about their own lack of intelligence, and so must attack anyone who is actually intelligent. Their whole world view is hinges on them being smart, and the Dems being wrong. Anything that counters that is dangerous to them.
    1
  11.  @DavidLucas-zq8gb  Neither. It has been proven what we are, how the universe happened, all of it. The God hypothesis isn't necessary to explain any of it. With good reason: because the scientific method was devised nearly 2,000 years after the complete compiling of the writings in the Bible. So the Bible isn't science, or history. It isn't meant to be. It doesn't change the importance of having God in your life either. Intelligent people will realize, accept, and admit what they don't know: They'll have humility. And they'll study everything, including both science and the Bible. Peace.
    1
  12. I normally reject claims with "both sides" in it, but this is absolutely true. Those things are not limited to one political party.
    1