Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Caller: Why Are You Still Talking About Trump?" video.

Joe Maleski You know you can look this up, yourself. And If you believe there are none, it's probably a good idea to do some Google searches. Edit: So after a simple Google search, I found this gem: "Some are civil suits stemming from his pre-presidential business dealings. Others are defamation claims from women he allegedly assaulted. More still are criminal probes and civil actions that scrutinize his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The Chart below tracks all these cases. It will be continually updated as major legal developments occur." https://www.justsecurity.org/75032/litigation-tracker-pending-criminal-and-civil-cases-against-donald-trump/ So you can read everything about each of the claims against Trump. They're organized, with helpful links. And you get continuous updates, as they occur. Enjoy.
1
Joe Maleski " lmao, if it’s there, why can’t you present what it is??? Nice deflection of responsibility. Very gen z of you" I'm Gen X, punk. I've also already anticipated that you would be too lazy to do a simple Google search, and did one for you. You're welcome. You can find it in the edited post above, which I posted 3 minutes before your post.
1
Joe Maleski Oh but you could project your lack of responsibility, for informing yourself (which isn't my responsibility) onto me? Have you looked at it yet? Are you going to be so lazy that, not only is Google too hard, but clicking on the link is too much to ask?
1
Joe Maleski You asked what his crimes are, I showed you a link that lists everything he's being investigated on. But that doesn't count, because he hasn't been convicted? You really don't care, at all, what he has done. Do you? We aren't talking about Facebook conspiracies here, but actual trials. Yeah, you're a lazy punk troll. Good luck with that. Should make your life interesting.
1
Joe Maleski "And it’s your responsibility to provide information when you confronted an issue you disagree with dude..." It's not my responsibility to inform you. That's on you. But I did it anyway. And you brushed it aside. The burden of proof was, indeed, on me. I claimed something. And then I backed it up. Has he been convicted of anything yet? No. But you asked about his criminal acts. You didn't ask for convictions. I gave you, therefore, a complete list of all the criminal acts he's being investigated for. You then replied, after about a minute, that you weren't satisfied. Sorry, but that's all there is. Dismiss it if you want. But if the man I elected President was under such investigations (that weren't just Facebook conspiracies), I'd want to know. I guess you can now say you didn't vote for Trump, any other garbage to do the deflection you claim others do. Pathetic.
1
Joe Maleski No, what I'm saying is that I've had enough of you, troll. Better things to do with my life than continue wasting effort on you.
1