Comments by "ncwordman" (@ncwordman) on "Gun-toting neo-Nazis are against drag shows" video.

It should be the same in the United States.
133
@CHARLES_H_DOLAN_Jr If the parents choose to bring them, and if that ever does even happen, then yes, really.
25
@Valicroix "Could we change the Constitution to make hate speech illegal? In theory but I think that would be a very dangerous thing to do." Maybe. But it would definitely be dangerous to allow hate groups to show up armed where there are children present. It would definitely be dangerous if they were armed, screaming, wearing masks. So with a maybe on the one hand, and a definitely on the other, I'm thinking the definitely should definitely be removed.
10
@CHARLES_H_DOLAN_Jr Edit: After reading again the person you replied to, I think I understand. For future reference, if you write less than even one complete sentence, it can be difficult to understand what you're even talking about, or what your point is. And we can all see and reply to your post.
8
@calvinsaxon5822 "Yes, we should implement fascist laws in order to forbid fascist symbols. Brilliant." You need any more straw to build that man? I got some. Here.
6
@fractalign "5 years for doing the Hitler salute ? Of course, that’s not at all draconian 🤣🤣🤣🤣" Take it up with Germany. Seems a lot less harsh and severe than having armed hate groups show up, screaming and chanting, to events where there are children; not to mention far less severe than the man with the funny mustache. Right? As an aside, do you get paid a ruble for every emoji?
6
Because that's what they're told to be concerned about.
5
@Valicroix I sympathize with your position. Truly. And you may be right, in the end, in the future, which we can't know at this point. However, in the present, we have armed hate groups showing up to children's events. So I think the 1st amendment was made for our nation's citizens, and not that our citizens were made for the 1st amendment. Given the rise in hate group activity, this is a clear and present danger, and not some "maybe in the distant, unknown future" situation.
5
@Valicroix "Censoring speech, even disgusting speech like this, can be a slippery slope. Who gets to decide what speech should be allowed and what speech should be outlawed?" I guess we can let Republicans decide: Don't Say Gay, Pride Flags, Drag time story hour, whatever they're calling CRT, not to mention the books they're trying to ban. None of those things bring guns within proximity of children. None of those things wave the flag of an insane government that once declared war on our country. Intolerant people like to hide behind the protections of tolerance.
2
@CHARLES_H_DOLAN_Jr "You can't answer for someone else. Move on." I don't think I will move on. I like it here! It's nice. I can answer anyone I want. This is a public forum. I tried to be deferential to you, homecheese, even edited my post. But you can suck it. Now, how are you doing today? How's the weather? How'd you get all that sand in your vajayjay?
1
@CHARLES_H_DOLAN_Jr "So kids CHILDREN should be allowed to go to a RATED R drag show????" Now I see where you're coming from. I gave you the benefit of the doubt before, when you don't deserve it. First, it's not rated R. Secondly, their parents are with them. Third, these things happen in libraries, public parks, hardly the homes of debauchery. Finally, it's not your call to make. Nor does that call fall to the freaking Nazis. You think the Nazis are concerned about children? You think they're the bastion of morality, and the morality police? They are obviously villains. So since they are the antagonists, then the protagonists would be the drag queens. And who is more concerned about the children then their parents? Certainly not you.
1
@lobola956 "Government teaching kids how to act is a great idea." I'm not seeing where the government is teaching kids how to act. Anywhere. At all. You even went so far as to make this hyperbolic statement: "democrats: we have to teach your kids how to be caring and compassionate from here in Washington. Shut up, sit down. Those are our kids not yours." Your straw man is sad and obvious, as is your reasoning. See, if you can claim the democrats (and them alone) are doing that to kids, then it's okay for the goose steppers to show up with their flags and guns---at children events. That's what you're really defending, in this pathetic attempt at deflection and projection.
1
While armed, and waving the flag of a government that once declared war on the United States...in front of children.
1
@josephmayfield945 "no it shouldn't." What a concise rebuttal. Thanks for your input.
1
@Gomd6996 "nope we have freedom of speech suck it leave if u don’t like it" Wow. This was from months ago. Don't know what I wrote that triggered you. And I'm certainly not going to look through 146 replies for it. Next time, copy/paste it as I did here. As for you reply: Freedom of speech refers to the government not interfering in your right to peaceably assemble. I'm not the government, and I can condemn any Nutzie I want. So YOU can leave if you don't like it. Though why in the world anyone would feel the need to defend these bottom-feeding ultra maroons is beyond me: unless of course you're one of them. Oh, but you're defending your misconception of freedumb of being armed against civilians. Actual freedom is wasted on you lowlifes.
1