Comments by "Astrum" (@astrumspace) on "Black Holes Might Not Be Objects | Black Holes Part 1" video.

  1. I definitely will! I enjoy it a lot!
    39
  2. It's a great analogy, but just about your second to last paragraph, I thought that this is considered an oversimplified explanation, because actually it's also about time and not just about space, and it's about parts of the quantum field not able to fully vibrate or vibrate in sync which separates the particles. I'm doing more research at the moment for the next part in the series so I'm trying to wrap my head around this concept.
    30
  3. That's a really cool way of thinking of it. Thanks!
    25
  4. @Richard Conway yes, I realise it is unproven, and I will emphasize that in the video. I did find it interesting though that hawking radiation was detected in an artificial "sonic" black hole - which I will also mention. It just shows the math is right, but whether sonic and normal black holes are analogous is the next debate. However I will check out what you just mentioned! Thanks
    7
  5. I covered myself by starting the section by saying "For high mass stars..." :P
    3
  6. I think it's like mass trying to get to the speed of light, it can keep getting faster but never quite get there. The matter falling towards the black hole does keep moving closer and closer, but it gets to the point where its movement becomes unnoticeable to the observer, even if it really is still moving.
    2
  7. I've already made a rough draft of it... Just going through it to make sure it's both correct and as understandable as possible (it is a really tricky concept to wrap one's head around so it's really important to get this right)
    2
  8. Forwards
    2
  9. A sphere is a 3D object, so if there is no space then there can be no 3D object
    2
  10. Hey, nothing wrong with pondering the mysteries of the universe! It leads to discoveries and learning! :)
    1