Comments by "Maiden DE" (@maidende8280) on "Women Prefer Submissive Roles in Relationships but Not in The Way You Think" video.

  1.  @Kitkat-986  It’s about giving up control, which shows incredible trust in the man.
    6
  2.  @richardsteiner45  Building is possible later in life, it’s just more difficult and of course you are more developed if you are high-quality people.
    4
  3. You need to move in higher quality circles that have higher quality women.
    3
  4. Please elaborate?
    3
  5.  @erickkisreal9398  Yes, they have to find a way to monetise their interests. And as for the people who lack passion I don’t care about them at all. I realise that’s most people, but they are just NPCs. This is why historically so many men did not reproduce.
    2
  6.  @erickkisreal9398  I was speaking generally, and some money does NOT mean a lot of money. I personally do not care about money beyond the bare minimum necessary. There are plenty of women who are not golddiggers. I value intellect and companionship far more than anything material in a man, though of course there must be physical attraction. There are plenty of non-wealthy men who are married. Most most married men are not wealthy, in fact. Runaway hypergamy is not good, but that is a cultural problem. Some hypergamy is absolutely necessary in order for humanity to improve. Without hypergamy civilisation would not exist.
    2
  7. This is my favourite video from you so far! I could not agree more. I am extremely honest and almost always pursue as a woman & it works SO well, far better than when men pursue me. No doubt it greatly helps that I’ve always known my objective function since early childhood. Self-awareness + constant striving for self-improvement is incredibly overpowered. Sharing this video with everyone. 😍
    2
  8.  @Joe-sg9ll  Maybe in some cases but definitely not all.
    1
  9.  @Joe-sg9ll  I don’t get your point. I’m not talking about men who initiate this. I’m talking about women who enjoy doing this and ask their partners to do it to them.
    1
  10. How old were you both when you met?
    1
  11. You missed the point.
    1
  12.  @erickkisreal9398  They clearly state in the video that it’s about being passionate about your objective function and pursuing it successfully, demonstrating competence which will attract women. That is not equivalent to being Genghis Khan or a billionaire president.
    1
  13.  @erickkisreal9398  Well, men without agency, yes. But that only matters if you are a man without agency and if you’re watching this channel, I assume that you are less likely to be such a man.
    1
  14.  @erickkisreal9398  I’m autistic, & I don’t know how much you’re exaggerating. I’m really anti fast food, but the rest is fine. My late husband was broke when I met him (& actually in major student debt), but very passionate about chemistry & extremely competent. Later I was able to make a good life for us on just above average income. I knew he was going places, though, but it was never about the money but his passion & competence. I have my own money now so I’d be fine with a low earner. The only reason I care about money is bc I want a lot of kids, but I am very good at budgeting and work hard so I can stretch a little money a long way.
    1
  15. No one sane will consider antinatalism or communism.
    1
  16. How old are you?
    1
  17.  @Brent-z2s  I know what he’s talking about. Personally, I have little interest in emotional intelligence relative to IQ.
    1
  18. I’ve had the same issues as a highly opinionated strong willed woman. The man has got to be more disagreeable. But I agree with the above poster that men often don’t have major preferences for what they consider essentially trivial things like food or films.
    1