Comments by "Muhammad Muhammad" (@groundhight7446) on "TaiwanPlus Docs" channel.

  1. Even Philippine Igorot have much Austronesia -gene than Taiwan Aboriginal Taiwan aboriginal are not as pure as you think.
    5
  2. ​ @AngryKittens oldest Austronesia -related has been found in Kalimantan whose name is Punan Batu They are even older than 7000 years ago Liandao men/Nowadays Taiwan aboriginal/Philippine Igorot. Austronesia -gene out of Taiwan has been debunked
    3
  3. Mentawei have much Austronesia blood than Taiwan Aboriginal Punan-Batu have oldest Austronesia -gene on the world You are very ignorant about Austronesia -gene .
    3
  4.  @ge7sur3nka34  Science Evidence have proof that Punan Batu is Austronesia -related but predates Taiwan Aboriginal Textbook is not as accurate as Science research
    3
  5. Even Philippine Igorot have much Austronesia -gene than Taiwan Aboriginal Taiwan aboriginal are not as pure as you think.
    2
  6. If Austronesia -gene really origined in Taiwan or South China. Please tell me .Why the oldest Austronesia -gene is found in Kalimantan rather than China or Taiwan? More and more genetic scientist have begun to question about out of Taiwan theory Many of them think Austronesia -related had been living in Insular South East Asia before Taiwan Aboriginal spreaded Austronesia language into ISEA 5000-4000 years ago.😂
    2
  7.  @AngryKittens  I am pretty sure your knowledge about Austronesia -gene is out of time 1 . Punan batu is Austronesia-related but don't have any DNA from Taiwan aboriginal 2.Punan batu is Austronesia related but predates proto-austronesian. 3 .Punan Batu is Hunter gather. Genetic Science don't support They are descendants of Austronesia agriculture In conclusion.All this information points out an important truth. Austronesia -related had been living in Insular South East Asia before Taiwan Austronesia came to ISEA .
    2
  8.  @AngryKittens  last one point Taiwan aboriginal Immigrated to ISEA 4000 years ago and mixed with local older Austronesia related except for Punan batu
    2
  9.  @ge7sur3nka34  I don't think many Indonesia embrace out of Taiwan model. Many of them think Austronesia got their blood from ancient Sundaland Even some Taiwan Aboriginal such as Amis believe their ancestors came from North Philippine
    2
  10.  @ge7sur3nka34  Science Research don't support Indonesia came from Yunnan or Taiwan In contrast. Science support ancestors of Indonesia came from 30000-10000 years ago MSEA even Sundaland If you have read some newer research papers you will know it
    2
  11.  @ge7sur3nka34  The paper which I provide dont suggest Punan batu origined from China but support they are austronesian-related but predates proto austronesian
    2
  12.  @ge7sur3nka34  If you think Punan Batu is Austronesian related but came from China then you should provide English International Genentic Research to prove that rather than judge like an ignorant outsider
    2
  13.  @ge7sur3nka34  If you really think textbook is as accurate as Science research then you are too native and ignorant.
    1
  14.  @ge7sur3nka34  By the way .I am a Taiwanese not an Indonesian
    1
  15.  @ge7sur3nka34  Google Punan Batu 2023 genetic DNA
    1
  16.  @ge7sur3nka34  Google Punan Batu 2023 dna research
    1
  17.  @ge7sur3nka34  source : A multistage colonization model for Indonesia. /Deep ancestry of Bornean hunter-gatherers supports long-term local ancestry dynamics
    1
  18.  @AngryKittens  There is a statement in this paper Punan batu is Austronesia -related but predates proto-austronesian Source : Deep ancestry of Bornean hunter-gatherers supports long-term local ancestry dynamics
    1
  19.  @ge7sur3nka34  search ---Punan ancestry is Austronesian related but predates “Proto-Austronesian” in paper
    1
  20.  @ge7sur3nka34  you miss the statement Punan ancestry is Austronesian related but predates “Proto-Austronesian”
    1
  21.  @ge7sur3nka34  Seriously. You should improve your English reading. the paper which I provide didnt suggest Punan-Batu came from china via MSEA
    1
  22.  @ge7sur3nka34  The paper which I provide only suggest Punan-batu is Austronesian related but predates proto Austronesian without any DNA from Taiwan aboriginal The papre never mentioned Punan-Batu came from China
    1
  23.  @ge7sur3nka34  "People that predates austronesian but related, must come from southern china via MSEA" The paper what I provide never suggested what you said.I dont know how you got that think from this paper. But I am pretty sure You are a man who is too subjective to read Science paper You said there is no theory is absolute but said People that predates austronesian but related, "must" come from southern china via MSEA. Dont you figure out you are contradictory?🤣
    1
  24. ​ @ge7sur3nka34  "that paper doesn't dismiss austronesian expansion out of taiwan model at all, but rather proposed 3 waves migration of punan ancestry: (1st)melanesian aboriginal, (2nd)MSEA and (3)austronesian from taiwan via the Philipphines" Jesue.the paper never said punan ancestry came from melanesian aboriginal/MSEA/austronesian from taiwan Your Interpretation is totally wrong
    1
  25.  @ge7sur3nka34  Look at my comment.I have never deny Austronesia language origined in Taiwan.I just said Austronesia may get their blood from Sundaland since oldest Austronesia gene is found in Kalimantan
    1