Comments by "Wh47n0w1517" (@Wh47n0w1517) on "BBC" channel.

@Violka1987 You have not answered my question, you’ve just avoided. You’re saying what he was doing is OK, you’re really saying it’s OK if the whole of society was doing the same. You were the one that started with the ifs, “if the sex he's having is safe and both parties agreed to it.” The BBC were not saying anything against the Dude’s attitude and that’s promoting the Dude’s attitude. I don’t hate, I would not be against people messing up their lives if I hated them.
1
@Violka1987 You knew what people would be like because you made a judgment on his character. I would suggest he never goes for being a politician, he would not last long with that behaviour and stance on morality. I sure have explained enough why he is wrong, it’s not rocket science. Your real beef is about freedom of choice, he has got that, but it does not mean people should not speak out against impaired morality and try to change things for the better in societies.
1
@Violka1987 Could you imagine if everyone in the whole of the society had his attitude and went around acting like him? And here is the BBC somewhat pumping this out as if this is the way society should be because of sexual desires, but it’s the BBC that should be f-cked if they continue. …!
1
@Violka1987 You harass people that speak out against impaired morality. Even before anybody called him names you stated “I don't see why we should call him names” and therefore you knew what was coming because of his behaviour.
1
Qu'ils mangent de la brioche. Let them eat cake.......=)-
1
@Violka1987 People with his stance on morality, sexual behaviour, corrupts societies and drags them into depravity and something you would not want your own children to grow up to be like. There is always a price in everything that is done under the Sun, Western societies have become worse over the years and will probably end up being purged.
1
@Violka1987 It’s relevant to reality, unsavoury behaviour spreads like a disease and can corrupt societies and drag them into depravity. Rainbow unicorns don’t exist, stupid people exist and why some even need unfavourable behaviours explained to them. What makes something wrong is the repercussions, the price to be paid because of unsavoury behaviours. Even in societies with freedom of choice the line is still drawn, that Dude crosses the line in the eyes of many.
1