Comments by "Wh47n0w1517" (@Wh47n0w1517) on "Gay penguins split up" video.

@CJCA915 It’s the same, “Science does not see nature as having a thinking power.” and “ it's not thinking about it, it just is what it is”
3
@CJCA915 Dude, I had already stated “Science does not see nature as having a thinking power.”
2
@CJCA915 There are not "200+ other species" with homosexuality, lol, homosexuality by name is exclusively to people of the same sex.
1
@CJCA915 You're the cretin for thinking other species can be called homo, as in homosexuality...! Look up what homo means and is. It’s from propaganda bullsh!t where they started calling other species homosexual, but other species are not homo.
1
@CJCA915 Stop being such an idiot. There is the unnatural that goes against the natural that’s detrimental to a species. Copulation for reproducing is not detrimental to a species and therefore is the natural. Humans don’t need homosexuality to learn how to copulate for reproducing. It’s you that needs to get a grasp, the natural world of water cycle was not even being commented on, well,…unless you believe the water cycle creates homosexuality?
1
@CJCA915 You’re the turd, you think it’s all created through sexual attraction, nothing more nothing less…! They are being opportunists if the birds have been caught engaging in bisexual relationships. Why don’t you study imprinting, imprinting was something I was withholding until a pick like you came along with stupidity.
1
@CJCA915 It was claimed they recently paired up, propaganda bullsh!t. They were being opportunists until something better comes along. It also does not mean they had no imprinting, Zoos know birds need imprinting otherwise it will create problems. Science does not see nature as having a thinking power, but we are the ones that try to control nature.
1
@CJCA915 The penguins would not of even wanted to be with another penguin if no imprinting. Birds get the imprinting very early in their life, they imprint on their parents and then follow them around.
1