Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "5 Major Problems With The Big Bang Theory | Answers With Joe" video.

Molecular Hydrogen The invisible matter has been found, yet all but ignored by mainstream science. Massive quantities of molecular hydrogen were more recently discovered to exist in galactic space, greater than the mass of all stars in the galaxy and extending outward many times the diameter of the visible component. This extended mass of the galaxy causes the visible anomaly where the galactic arms are seen to rotate at nearly the same rate as the galactic center. To maintain support for the "Big Bang", molecular hydrogen cannot be addressed, as this is the more likely cause for the red shift of distant objects, as well as the gravitational anomaly just mentioned. In fact, a paper written by Canadian scientist Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the Big Bang back in 1990 but has been largely ignored. He also theorized the probable existence of interstellar and intergalactic matter as the cause of the red shift, before molecular hydrogen had been discovered in quantity -- rather than the doppler effect due to expansion. To be in consensual agreement seems to be the prime directive in science today in place of an objective point of view and evidence. This functions in the same manner as a political ideology.
1
The Big Bang (a theory?) Distant galaxies more recently discovered highlight serious problems for the Big Bang theory. This theory requires a period of 13.8 billion years for the age of the universe since the Big Bang is said to have occurred. A galaxy has been found to be 13.5 billion light years from Earth.. The light from this galaxy began traveling toward us 13.5 billion years ago. Therefore, at that time when the universe was only 300 million years old, the distance between the galaxy and Earth was already 13.5 billion light years, the light traversing this distance during that time period to reach us. Assuming that expansion exists, this distance would now be greater. This means that expansion had already occurred of at least 13.5 billion light years when the universe was assumed to be only 300 million years old. There are also galaxies found to exist billions of light years distant in the opposite direction from Earth and even further from the first galaxy. Moreover, the universe itself cannot be expanding at the speed of light, or no stars and galaxies would be visible to us. As a result, to reach our current state of expansion as theory dictates, this would require the age of the universe to be many times greater than what is possible according to the given theory. If there is a simple explanation for the obvious as stated above, we've yet to see it. There are many who would rather create all kinds of theoretical speculation over unproven invisible matter called “dark matter”, whose existence needs the Big Bang theory – which also requires dark matter to prove it's own existence. Science, as in politics, is an exercise in consensus building and the suppression of information that does not serve – while it becomes dependent upon money, politics and career building – so that true and accurate information often will take a back seat to other concerns and agendas. Regarding dark matter -- it's predicated upon the existence of a space faring variant male of the bovine species
1
Big Bang illusions As mentioned in the above comment, a galaxy has been found to be 13.5 billion light years away from Earth. If the light left the galaxy 13.5 billion years ago, the universe must then be far older than the 13.8 billion years that we are told as dictated by theory. If we try to say however that 13.5 billion light years is the current distance that exists today from Earth to the galaxy in question so far far away -- a galaxy that existed only 300 million years after the occurrence of the big bang event -- the combined expansion rate of the Earth and the galaxy from one another must then be nearly 98% of the speed of light. The reason for this is that expansion began only 300 million years earlier as required by the prevalent theory and mathematics of a universe that is 13.8 billion years old. The combined speed of Earth and the galaxy as they move away from one another is then 13.5 divided by 13.8 or 97.83% of the speed of light. However, light would not be visible from an object that is moving away from us at nearly 98% of the speed of light. Even at nearly half the speed of light if only our speed is taken into account, a 49% increase in wave length would shift the light from the galaxy entirely outside of the visible spectrum. Such evidence has been increasingly apparent for decades now as objects are regularly found at ever greater distances. As is sometimes the case, when data doesn't match the prevailing theory, the evidence is ignored while people look elsewhere for fanciful concepts to engage in for support. Politics and corruption require the suppression and limitation of information. Changes are happening today as we begin to recognize for ourselves. Take on your own obligation and personal initiative in the thought process.
1
Our galaxy in it's beauty and complexity cannot be created in the few dozen revolutions that were possible since the occurrence of the theorized big bang event. However, when a fully formed galaxy is found to exist in a universe only 300,000 years old -- this allows a period of time of between 2 and 4 revolutions at most for the formation of a galaxy that cannot be explained by any stretch of celestial mechanics. This is another case where evidence does not need to fit the theory if it can be ignored. The process of consensus and career building can be so strong even among learned professionals, that no ability remains in the individual to consider until it passes muster in a feel good form of assumed and group oriented awareness in the place of any individual perspective.
1