Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "The Problem With Sabine Hossenfelder" video.
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
Denial . . Science denial . .
Sponsored efforts will never question the nature of security narratives provided in justification, when support is involved, by which institutions of science are also in part corrupted within as a part of the clued-in networking environment in safekeeping and status keeping, in alignment with eugenicist based narratives -- involving extreme agendas that none will question in a one directional exchange that masquerades as the development of ideas and concerns, without the ability to identify where initiative lay in the process -- responsibility for so much concern assumed through repetition in the circulation of information, managed no differently than public narratives in repetition -- figureheads do not serve in that capacity. The more extreme the approach and the more serious the concern as shared in confidentiality, the less need will you find in any skeptic in name to address serious issues responsibly, when support required would be of an individual nature in initiative and one's own individual perspective and integrity.
The ultimate form of delusion and deception is in any form of confidentiality when tied to any concept of security -- the ultimate form in assumed concern for the planet in extreme measures intimated -- while not recognizing beyond ones enthrallment in participation the overwhelmingly influence prevalent today, as though such influence did not previously exist during recent decades and further back for a century and more, under the notion that humanity was out of control, rather than the scourge that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the management of crises that can be developed -:not by conspiracy, but through the same means by which one person here will not question his part in this production. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means through group-oriented behavior and identification - the means of influence and division in human memory . . the art of politics and any form of division -- when you take the individual out of the process.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1