Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "“They Ended My Career To Hide The Truth About 9/11!” - Fmr Congressman Curt Weldon" video.

  1. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    11
  2. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    6
  3. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    3
  4. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    3
  5. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  6. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  7. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  8. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  9. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  10. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  11. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  12. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  13. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  14. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    2
  15. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  16. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  17. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  18. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  19. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  20. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  21. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  22. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  23. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  24. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  25. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  26. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  27. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  28. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1
  29. Which is more extreme -- to accept without question the inexplicable lack of turbulence in the wake of a 500 mph large passenger airliner not evident in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone only seconds later? -- or to recognize the imperfect nature of digital projection as we see a wing disappear in front of a bright blue sky? From another camera angle, the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable.
    1