Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "Sad excess deaths" video.

  1. 2
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. It's a shame that he really has to mince his words and still try to make his point in a round about way to avoid censorship on this platform . . "But we are a private company" . . and so is the telephone company. Social media platforms that serve millions of people function as a utility similar to telephone and are equally as important today for communication as most would agree -- and should be regulated in a similar fashion by an agency such as the FCC that is subject to the provisions of the constitution. Soviet style censorship -- and that is what we see here -- makes no difference other than labels of perception which form of tyranny takes place under the networking of similar long term interests -- a network of internationalists linked to oligarchs necessary to make the Soviet economy function such as it was and by which Stalin was subject to that only increased his paranoia having to give credence to someone at a point that remained beyond his control if the country were not to collapse into chaos by which he could no longer reign for long no matter how many he might murder. Terrorizing his people would bring his own demise when they have nothing else left to believe in. A semblance of democracy in a democratic republic must be maintained for public perception as we swing further away with each change of leadership and each crisis to justify more need to restrict activity in the name of security of every imaginable kind -- without a clue where responsibility lay for so much concern. The one true extreme lay at the feet of every single one of us -- an extreme lack of initiative by which so much corruption is possible through nothing more than a normalized process in group oriented behavior in all manner of activity regarding the public and in any other role of government and corporate related function and privileged communication and activity in perception by which much greater deception is possible and prevalent -- requiring no need to identify initiative in the process, lest we take a risk ourselves. Initiative equates to responsibility, something that we so much want to avoid today in real terms, that we no longer require it on the part of anyone involved. We only require the circulation of information so that we feel safe enough to participate without fear of accusation. Exceptions become targets to be labeled and packaged, when they are too few or have too few in support.
    1
  9. ​ @simonpaine2347  . . "if you consider stopping the spreading of misleading information" . . 😃. . as sponsored activity in the forum -- if you were here of your own initiative, you would engage with your greater potential here with all of us -- your true value and unlimited potential. The individual perspective is the focus of power, by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. The individual -- rather than group oriented activity by which we remain divided is the saving grace of humanity. Communication of any real kind requires initiative that can only exist at the individual level, leading to compromise and resolution. When you take the individual out of the process through the fear of disagreement, you make division possible and permanent through nothing more than group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by any point of division, by which we are not free to think for ourselves, as we watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division in group oriented behavior, and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other social, cultural and political crises that can be created and maintained. The ultimate form of division is the concept in any form of security, including its final form -- saving the planet, yet without a clue where responsibility lay for so much concern, without which nothing is possible on any legitimate basis -- rather than merely the circulation of information and concepts . . the elite are that group most easily managed, because they have never initiated anything outside of their own self-serving culture of interests. To introduce eugenics concepts among them over 90 years ago cost them nothing in money or effort let alone initiative. Down the road, many others are brought into a similar fold by various means, overly enthralled and impressed by these important people involved . . nothing can be simpler, involving people no differently than the public who only require the circulation of information and nothing more -- repetition to feel safe as well as in the much greater potential for deception in the form of privileged communication of any kind, under the notion someone knows something that another does not -- so addictive, and yet no one would ever use such effective means to their advantage . . You tell me -- if you can find it within yourself to come up with an answer of your own . . or fearful of being packaged and wrapped up outside any safe area of agreement -- an illusion without one's own initiative in the thought process or a clue as to who functions differently than you do. Figureheads do not serve as a point of initiative in any real sense of the term. Fear of recognizing responsibility must then accuse rather than look inward to what has been missing. The one true extreme lay at our feet, lest we ever take a risk. Group oriented behavior throughout human history as we know it has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember. Normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence, so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware, lest we ever accept responsibility. The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence, but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of ones job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
    1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1