Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "Candace Owens"
channel.
-
3
-
How is JFK related to the current crisis in Ukraine? . . The character of an individual or nation is measured by their works . . development of gold-backed currency and a legitimate trading network is one of the most dangerous activities that any elected leader can attempt. JFK is the last president to have the courage to do the same in this country -- issuing silver-backed certificates that would retain their value and replace the dollar over time . . effectively eliminating the Fed and restoring a free and independent US economy with real currency. Very few other nations have had control over their money supply . . These are -- Libya and Gaddafi the "terrorist" had created gold-backed currency and a legitimate fund and trading network on that basis to support African nations and replace World Bank IMF loan sharking schemes that bankrupt these nations to maintain the status quo . . Syria, a formerly free and peaceful nation in control of it's own economy and money supply . . and Russia -- also in the process of creating gold-backed currency and a trading network with other BRIC nations -- real currency and a free economy as the true litmus test of freedom -- something that we haven't had the courage to attempt since JFK . . as any means must be found to create crisis and war in the region as US/Western networks installed the current Ukrainian regime in 2014 and have provided military training and weapons since at least 2016. Eight long years during the bombing of the Donbass region and the murder of thousands of ethnic Russians -- proves Russia's efforts to find any other solution to this . .
. . And that's about it -- all others enjoy as we do the benefits of legalized counterfeit "fiat" currencies that funnel the wealth of human exchange out of our economies so that we don't retain what we produce -- in the greatest of resources -- the human resource. Let's get comfortable now and turn on our television . .
Suppression and Attacks
After severe suppression of human rights for ethnic Russian people who are a majority in the Donbass area, as in most of eastern Ukraine, they and their local government desired to function as an autotominous state in order to lift this suppression against them. This began to occur after the installation of a new Ukranian government by corrupt means with the help of US and other western network involvement. The new Ukrainian government initiated attacks against them in response. False information will frequently state this is a result of warmaking from both sides, while Russian forces did not enter until the year 2022. Supporting narratives require repetition rather than comprehension in the context of preceding events in order to create a western consensus in favor of support for this illegitimate government placed into power by corrupt means.
US Support and Attacks
The local government had no military force to speak of, even while the US has provided military training and weapons to the Ukrainian government during most of this period. Any action at all on the part of eastern Ukraine regions under attack has been through provocation and attempts to defend and thwart further attacks against their people.
No Conspiracy is Necessary to Support Corruption
What a coincidence that those interests intimately involved in the laundering of drug money in hundreds of billions of dollars yearly -- and the logistics of contraband in hand with intel networks (now pretty much public knowledge) -- are the same interests controlling fiat currencies and finance in most nations . . and those few exceptions having a free economy under their own currency being where crisis and intervention by any means become necessary -- including network activity in Libya, Syria and now Russia by proxy to create war and intervention by any means. Security narratives for the compartmentalized function of government activity remain in support by which the most substantial form of freedom in those nations developing a legitimate free economy with real currency must be attacked -- and it's no surprise that the dollar and other fiat currency prevail once again in the aftermath, no conspiracy necessary in the normalized conduct of war and supporting narratives in the name of security. Russia now is involved with dozens of other nations who want to conduct finance and trade similarly outside of the dollar and other fiat debt instruments to maintain and increase national GDP and a growing economy -- freedom of a real kind beyond the assumptions we claim out of ignorance. Not since JFK have we even made the attempt.
Normalized Human Behavior and Acceptance
Normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware lest we ever accept responsibility. There is a literal flood of disinformation in western media reports and online sources circulating similar information -- yet the motives are clear for all who retain the ability to look at our recent history elsewhere and what corrupt interests have to gain in support of another war with potential for dangerous escalation that Russia has done everything possible to avoid. Imagine in reverse if a rogue government were installed in Mexico by Russia that proceeds to eliminate all normal human rights for American relatives and expats living there, who object, try to organize and then are attacked over a period of 8 years with thousands dying not far from our border -- how long would we accept those circumstances? . . 8 years? Not likely. What excuse or blame on ethnic Americans would justify the attacks against them and their murder by the thousands?
Risk of Escalation and Nuclear Warfare
How much example do we need for the kind of information we have received from the US government and our media for our involvement -- and the horrible result by which Russia exercised great restraint in trying to find any other possible means than war during all of that time? -- knowing how they would be presented in western media and to the world, giving justification for those who may want to initiate a wider conflict if enough people can be led in support. Will we support even more involvement and enter into war with Russia with heavy risk of escalation using nuclear weapons?
Fascism by Definition Exists Today
Sites such as Wikipedia and similar sources have never been an accurate and unbiased source for controversial issues and events, nor has corporate media retained a culture of true journalistic enterprise. In support of security narratives, a fascist environment has been present with collusion of government involvement and corporate interests by which we don't retain freedom for journalism in this country -- even as independent firms and journalists are frequently threatened and do get censored and canceled from corporate social media platforms as well as payment platforms, making it difficult to function freely in a country that claims to be a democracy. This is the definition of fascism in support of crisis and war that can be inflicted outside of our borders -- even leading to the threat of World War 3 and nuclear warfare.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Repetition is needed to establish a safe space where we cannot be accused -- the one true extreme that lay at the feet of all of us -- an extreme lack of initiative by which so much corruption is possible and prevalent through nothing more than normalized human behavior and acceptance in group oriented behavior and identification -- the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Politics as all forms of division is the classic art of removing the individual from the process in the manner of risk aversion through group oriented behavior and identification. Individuals are very difficult to control -- until you condition into them that shared compulsion of fear by which we function only by risk aversion -- and shared compulsion never needs to be acknowledged. Division is in reality only possible when you remove the individual from the process.
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based shared response by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today.
Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification.
The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight by which we cannot be divided. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves .
There is a continuity in the evolution of human affairs and events where little of an arbitrary nature takes place. No thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means -- normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware lest we ever accept responsibility. The elite are that group most easily managed, because they feel too important and they have no other desires -- and they have never initiated anything outside of their own self-serving culture of interests. Over 90 years ago, eugenics narratives and concepts were introduced and circulated among the elite, without risk, effort or expense on their part to give them a sense of purpose -- and then down the road many more people are brought into a similar fold by various means within the networking environment -- overly enthralled and impressed by these important people involved. Figureheads do not serve as a point of initiative in the networking element on the part of all involved -- where none can identify who is responsible for so much concern beyond repetition in confidentiality managed no differently than narratives given for public consumption, yet with much greater potential in ultimate deception -- unrecognized as such continuity of interests only made things worse at every step and in every possible way under similar supporting narratives in justification, yet none having the courage to look and perceive for themselves beyond that provided without risk and with substantial benefit to themselves in support.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of one's job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
1
-
You can take it as a sign of respect that some people took the time to more cleverly address the threat that you present and mainstream you, separating you from the potential of influence that you represented as a completely independent personality in the new media and growing paradigm of thought provoking and original concepts and content outside of accepted ideologies and protected and limiting status. The strength of your work is also in how you communicate without compulsively pushing one ideology but instead show the value of a conservative point of view in light of the suppression labeled as liberal today (fake liberal). I do believe that you can do good things within the mainstream media and help it to change perhaps, but I also believe that the potential is much greater elsewhere in the long run and the attempt is to stifle it at every turn.
I personally believe in no ideology because of its great capacity to handicap and limit people, territorialize them and prevent them from communicating on a real level and even prevent individual thought rather than self identification, proving and accusing in the process. Nothing of value that is energetically held with run away -- and without a handicap, the ability to think can be retained on an individual basis, the only place where it can truly live. People who invest in ideologies can become defensive and the energy is engaged in the zero sum mentality where to gain one must take from another politically,, emotionally and also economically for many. It literally removes or greatly reduces a person's ability to think or consider new information, with so many filters taking first priority. The inner connection comes last, our original and true birthright and the only place where we truly learn and understand when something resonates. Bla blah. . my thoughts ha ha
If you've been convinced to look at Infowars with a jaundiced eye for any reason, please reconsider. What I value most from their work is its genuine nature, unscripted. Alex seems very worried at times about what people think, but yet he does a bare minimum to none in terms of scripting their productions. Over time it's this more than anything else that has led me to value what they provide and what they represent.
1