Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "Spark" channel.

Money for a production cannot stand against massive evidence of fraud. Apollo is a Swiss cheese, full of holes and palatable for those who wish to believe it.
6
There is fraud apparent during most if not all EVA's where no evidence of pressure is seen. More recently when bubbles are also seen to escape, just as occurs during underwater simulation, the reality becomes apparent. Underwater tanks designed to conduct such training have all of the identical gear necessary to replicate space craft as well as suits used for the EVA's. Only the addition of a colored backdrop is necessary in order to add a background layer providing a view of the Earth from orbit. While it seems clear enough that shuttle flights are a reality, EVA's are another story. The bubbles that escape occasionally are seen to behave precisely as expected when escaping an underwater enclosure (the suit, at the helmet ring and its point of attachment). No explanation is attempted or can be made for these, apparently assuming that no one would bother to notice. Another serious error is found in video aboard the ISS where glitches occur now and then that affect the astronauts alone, proving a layered image and a separate background source. The ability to stream CGI is advanced now for floating objects that they can interact with also. One interesting video has an astronaut reaching handling and placing an invisible object during an apparent glitch that occured so that the layer for the object was not visible to us. Having multiple sources creates a risk that some kind of error or bad connection will eliminate one feed and we will see something unexpected and unexplained.
5
Yes, they lost the technology of shielding? No one can even remember? . . so that Project Orion must be launched, the first step to test methods for protecting astronauts. . The effort failed and the rest of the project was canceled.
4
The astronauts move without restriction or difficulty while walking and working on the moon. This however cannot occur in a vacuum. Suit technology hasn't reached the point where an astronaut can be ambulatory enough to permit walking in a vacuum without very stiff and awkward movements or great effort to strain against suit pressure that is multiplied over several hundred square inches for each limb of the suit. 5 psi becomes hundreds of pounds in the leg of a suit for example, and a substantial part of that pressure is working against any movement away from the shape formed under pressure. The same occurs for the smaller arms of the suit, moved by human arms of proportionately less strength. Fingers also move only with difficulty, whose strength drains quickly under the strain so that useful work would be nearly impossible. An advanced form of suit that incorporates a lightweight exoskeleton might be possible, maintaining suit pressure while permitting movement, perhaps power assisted. Clearly, this is not what we've seen so far, while there is evidence of faking some of the space videography even in low earth orbit. While hammering, we can hear the sound of hammering in the astronaut's microphone though he stands in a vacuum on the moon's surface. We're told the sound traveled through is arm and into his suit having a breathable oxygen mixture. Another astronaut throws an object and we hear the sound clearly as the objects strikes the lunar module -- no arm to conduct the sound into the astronaut's suit. . No other mic was on, other than those worn by both astronauts. . We expect more name-calling, derogatory language and assumptions in place of any legitimate or genuine response. Prove us wrong. .
4
@erc9468 . .How do you lose and forget the technology of shielding when they clearly tell us the command module was of aluminum construction as the only form of shielding. Yet, now they tell us "We must SOLVE these challenges before we send people through this region of space", the Van Allen Belts. . oh, right sorry JP Sears, the Van Halen Belts. . You can't have it both ways now. . Give it another try. We're ready.
2
@Raptus_Gaming . .Good point, proving fraud during most if not all EVA's where no evidence of pressure is seen. More recently when bubbles are also seen to escape, just as occurs during underwater simulation, the reality becomes apparent. Underwater tanks designed to conduct such training have all of the identical gear necessary to replicate space craft as well as suits used for the EVA's. Only the addition of a colored backdrop is necessary in order to add a background layer providing a view of the Earth from orbit. While it seems clear enough that shuttle flights are a reality, EVA's are another story. The bubbles that escape occasionally are seen to behave precisely as expected when escaping an underwater enclosure (the suit, at the helmet ring and its point of attachment). No explanation is attempted or can be made for these, apparently assuming that no one would bother to notice. Another serious error is found in video aboard the ISS where glitches occur now and then that affect the astronauts alone, proving a layered image and a separate background source. The ability to stream CGI is advanced now for floating objects that they can interact with also. One interesting video has an astronaut reaching handling and placing an invisible object during an apparent glitch that occured so that the layer for the object was not visible to us. Having multiple sources creates a risk that some kind of error or bad connection will eliminate one feed and we will see something unexpected and unexplained.
2
Kit Canyon . .Derogatory comments are non-stop from those who cannot answer. . So entertaining. . Don't quit now. . We see it over and over again. .
2
It is the compulsive defenders and apologists who must repeatedly name-call and paste assumptions -- as you also have done here. Such behavior enlightens us to the desperation as we see the same kind of responses over and over again.
2
@kmelsha . .5psi is a hell of a lot more pressure than a mylar party balloon. . Pressure simply wouldn't look good all bundled up like the Michelen Man while on the lunar stage. . Let's hear some of YOUR math. .. HA HA Ha. .
2
@DrTWG . .Nice try. . . . a good set of PJ's will carry you a long way. . or is it barebottom today?
2
The shuttle flights are most likely legitimate in launching satellites for example. However, we see glitches in some video aboard the ISS that affect the astronauts alone, indicating a layered image with multiple sources. When they float freely for minutes at a time, there is no drift to one side or rotation. Yet we see slight movement upward and down with no apparent cause to first drift upward, then down again. When the same thing is noticeable over and over again with no other drift, it becomes clear that a method of suspension is being used. These are multi-layered video images with multiple sources and the astronauts recorded in front of a green screen under suspension. This is something that you can easily do today with available software. CGI for separate objects has also greatly advanced and can be manipulated during live streaming.
2
@erc9468 . .Favrelous. . I'll keep that in mind, thanks. . Apollo is a Swiss cheese, full of holes and palatable for those who wish to believe it. .
1
@derekstoike2405 . . IC's or integrated chips at that time were large and pretty much indestructible in comparison to today's microprocessors. . Project Orion proved the vulnerability of people to radiation from the Van Halen Belts (thanks again JP Sears) -- to the point where they had to shut down the project and suspend efforts to "repeat" a moon mission. . You gave it the ol' college try. . score one for the Swiss cheese Apollo.
1
. .I want to be a bootlicker for the mainstream and get paid to sit in my pajamas all day long. . There are no conspiracies. Corruption exists
1
Apollo is a Swiss cheese, full of holes and palatable for those who wish to believe it. Corruption exists, while naivety attempts to hold its own in desperation. Many of us now choose to stand upon our own two feet and think. Individual inquiry is the only true motivator in the learning process.
1
@DrTWG . . desperation can never give a legitimate argument. . You make my case. .
1
@DrTWG 😀
1
J Calhoun . . -- So unhappy and desperate in the forum. . A diver receives pressure in his breathing apparatus. Each time he or she takes a breath, the regulator releases the breathing gases, which may exclude nitrogen for deep divers to avoid the bends. A full suit having air fed through a hose from the surface is constantly releasing air into the sea so that the difference in pressure is negligible and the diver experiences no restriction of movement.
1
J Calhoun . .If you take a diving class, then you may begin to understand. . Ambient pressure is at work in both styles of diving apparatus, whether providing pressure through a breathing device by mouth or to a full suit [I described both -- read again]. Supplied air or other breathing mixture must overcome the ambient pressure at the diver's depth underwater. The diver then takes in air that is equal to the pressure around him, provided by the regulator -- as much air as needed. The regulator is designed to overcome ambient pressure when the diver takes a breath. From the surface and all the way down, our diver is taking in air at the ambient pressure around him -- equalizing the pressure within his lungs with the pressure outside his body. Likewise, we breathe air on the surface at sea level at nearly 15 psi -- but because we take in air at the same pressure, we don't notice the difference. At deep depth, the gases under pressure build in the blood and tissues. Only the accumulation of nitrogen is in significant quantity however and can cause a problem upon ascending as the nitrogen bubbles expand in tissues, if air is used during a deep dive -- if the diver rises too quickly. .
1
J Calhoun . .Your argument was that divers work under pressure, claiming they experience a pressure difference and yet can still move and function. . And so I found it necessary to enlighten you -- a diver always breathes gases that are equal in pressure to that experienced outside the body -- and he or she cannot survive otherwise. . Yet it should be obviously impossible to take in air otherwise, or suffer serious injury if the lungs are exposed to increased pressure. .
1
Origami Mambo Project . .Wow, how can I join your project? Happiness is addictive
1
Origami Mambo Project . . Favrelous
1
Francisco Alfaro . .Suit technology hasn't reached the point where an astronaut can be ambulatory enough to permit walking in a vacuum without very stiff and awkward movements or great effort to strain against suit pressure that is multiplied over several hundred square inches for each limb of the suit. 5 psi becomes hundreds of pounds in the leg of a suit for example, and a substantial part of that pressure is working against any movement away from the shape formed under pressure. The same occurs for the smaller arms of the suit, moved by human arms of proportionately less strength. Fingers also move only with difficulty, whose strength drains quickly under the strain so that useful work would be nearly impossible. An advanced form of suit that incorporates a lightweight exoskeleton might be possible, maintaining suit pressure while permitting movement, perhaps power assisted. Clearly, this is not what we've seen so far, while there is evidence of faking some of the space videography even in low earth orbit.
1
Francisco Alfaro . .Nice try. . According to the official NASA record, the suits maintained 5 psi for reasons of maintaining the health of the astronauts during long EVA's. Even at 3.7 psi, a pressure of much more than an ordinary mylar party balloon, pressurization would be very apparent and the restriction would be substantial, especially during long EVA's.
1
Thanks for making my point. The Russian cosmonaut proved the difficulty of trying to manage a suit under pressure in space. We safely avoided such a debacle by providing no pressurized suits. There was no sign of restriction whatsoever in their movements at any time and not a hint of pressurization. Without a pressurized suit, the astronauts were not in vacuum on the moon's surface. Apollo is a Swiss cheese, full of holes and palatable for those who wish to believe it.
1
We begin to stand upon our own two feet in the thought process and recognize corruption for what it is. Attempts to steer the direction of individual inquiry are becoming less effective and more desperate. We see the same kind of responses on a regular basis.
1
Francisco Alfaro . . There is not a hint of restriction as they -- Run. . Hop like rabbits. . Swing golf clubs. . Sing badly. . [so exhausted] Hammer with sound in vacuum. . . Jump salute [18" height with an effective weight of 60 lbs with backpack]
1
Tag team now because I always destroy them individually. . saves egos PJ's or ?
1
Francisco Alfaro . .I don't mean to be cruel, but you haven't said anything but nonsense. . Give it another try. . We're waiting.
1
Francisco Alfaro . .Nice try. . The astronaut also turned and threw an object against the lunar module and we hear the sound clear and apparent, no arm to pass vibrations. . Like before, you cannot answer. . You should lift yourself up now. . We know you have it in you for a legitimate argument. . The Swiss cheese Apollo soars to legendary status as we contemplate your next thought provoking response . .
1
Francisco Alfaro . .We ask. . . .PJ's or barebottom? . .Score one for the Swiss cheese Apollo. . Work at Home. . No Experience Necessary. .
1
Francisco Alfaro . . Which mission do you claim hammering can be heard through the arm and into the suit. . Ha ha HAHA And you must deny that he threw the object against the LM for all to hear. . Nice try. . .Again Earlier answer if you cannot find it: "Thanks for making my point. The Russian cosmonaut proved the difficulty of trying to manage a suit under pressure in space. We safely avoided such a debacle by providing no pressurized suits. There was no sign of restriction whatsoever in their movements at any time and not a hint of pressurization. Without a pressurized suit, the astronauts were not in vacuum on the moon's surface."
1
Francisco Alfaro . .we notice the dust next to the landing gear in which we see footprints. No crater, no problem. . . heavy dust only a few feet from the exhaust during landing?. . Yes, all have seen the video from within the lunar module of Apollo 11 just before touchdown as the dust is violently blown outward and away from the lander with no atmosphere to send it upward and back again. Yet the video is impossible to transmit in the necessary strength and bandwidth from a descending craft where no parabolic dish can focus a signal toward Earth. A unidirectional antenna would not be remotely capable of this challenge at 20 times the available power onboard the LM. Someone mentioned that the astronauts were very tired and exhausted from the restriction in pressurized suits, though we see no evidence of it. . Let's see, astronauts under great restriction from pressurization as they -- Run. . Hop like rabbits. . Swing golf clubs. . Sing badly. . [so exhausted] Hammer with sound in vacuum. . . Jump salute [18" height with an effective weight of 60 lbs with backpack] All without a hint of pressurization. . By the way, you can test pressurization for yourself as others have by constructing a small vacuum chamber using a small vacuum pump and a heavy industrial glove and drawing 10 Hg of partial vacuum, a difference of 5 psi, having one third atmospheric pressure inside the glove. Insert your hand and try moving the fingers and closing them. For safety include a release valve to quickly equalize the pressure. If the finger of the glove has only 6 square inches of area, this multiplies to 30 pounds, causing restriction against movement away from the shape formed under pressure. You can run and you can hide. . from a real answer. . We wait
1
Francisco Alfaro . . Yeah I was right, that's the old run rather than confront the issue. Many of us have seen that video but you have to convince others that it doesn't exist. Maybe when I'm not working I'll find it. well you could easily find it since you're here all day everyday desperately trying to support a false narrative that cannot hold up. Lro images don't match according to pixel resolution. And the craft has been shown to be the wrong size in the image. it is also overexposed with no apparent reason why it should be so because there are no upward facing panels that should create that effect and the sun is not overhead. A reflection from the sun at an oblique angle would not occur in the center of the craft it would be on one side of the craft or another. Now it's time for you to take a little time off, or are you paid to work through the night to? There are no conspiracies. Just corruption..
1
Francisco Alfaro . . You're desperate and resort to name calling in place of any knowledge concerning radio telemetry. They lacked the ability to relay video during which the command module was traversing the backside of the moon. Similarly the command module also did not have provision for a parabolic dish antenna to be oriented and focused toward the Earth so that no video signal of sufficient strength and bandwidth could be broadcast back to Houston or anywhere on Earth. However we look forward to your next entertaining response. Apollo is a Swiss cheese, full of holes and palatable for those who wish to believe it. . Gotta love it. .
1
Francisco Alfaro . .Since you don't understand, I'll repeat. . A parabolic dish would be necessary in order to focus a signal toward Earth having sufficient strength and bandwidth for video, something the command module was not provided. A unidirectional antenna cannot focus the signal in a particular direction so that the power requirement would be far beyond the capacity of battery and transmission equipment aboard either craft. Keep them coming. . don't leave us in suspense. .
1
Francisco Alfaro . .There was no parabolic dish aboard the command module or descending lunar module. The command module was oriented to follow the moon's surface as shown in video which renders the command module in a constant changing orientation relative to Earth. Even if it had a dish, it could not maintain a directional link to Earth reception having no computer controlled tracking capability at that time. First we'll wait for your photo of a dish -- . .and then we'll wait for your explanation of how they were able to focus that dish toward Earth while oriented to face the curvature as it passes on around the moon -- and even traversing behind the moon during the touchdown of Apollo 11 -- We sympathize with your dilemma in trying to overcome these uncomfortable facts for you. . Entertain us. .
1
Francisco Alfaro . .Your efforts to appear credible are childish and you didn't ask any questions that are relevant to the questionable aspects of this program for which you can't answer. . This is getting too good. . don't stop now --
1
Suit technology hasn't reached the point where an astronaut can be ambulatory enough to permit walking in a vacuum without very stiff and awkward movements or great effort to strain against suit pressure that is multiplied over several hundred square inches for each limb of the suit. 5 psi becomes hundreds of pounds in the leg of a suit for example, and a substantial part of that pressure is working against any movement away from the shape formed under pressure. The same occurs for the smaller arms of the suit, moved by human arms of proportionately less strength. Fingers also move only with difficulty, whose strength drains quickly under the strain so that useful work would be nearly impossible. An advanced form of suit that incorporates a lightweight exoskeleton might be possible, maintaining suit pressure while permitting movement, perhaps power assisted. Clearly, this is not what we've seen so far, while there is evidence of faking some of the space videography even in low earth orbit.
1
If you take a Tom Brady football having only 5 psi, it will still be difficult to depress one's fingers into the ball very far, although Tom will have a better grip (seriously, I like the Patriots -- amazing record). It will still be very hard to change the shape of the football. This effect of pressure would be very noticeable in the suits of the astronauts. Yet we see no hint of pressurization and their movement is a easy as if on Earth in ordinary clothes, whether in a spacewalk during repairs or walking on the moon's surface.
1