Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "Kim Iversen: Joe Rogan Warns Against DISARMING Population, Gov't Are NOT The Good Guys" video.
-
. . it's time that we begin to take a little personal responsibility. While most of these incidents have serious questions regarding the narrative and legitimacy in at least some respects -- people today have a shared compulsive fear of being labeled today or called a name, considered to be extreme, "alt" or any kind of label -- so that we can no longer address any issue objectively. Let's look at Vegas as an example. There were thousands of rounds of heavy caliber gunfire heard on audio, fired from above in the hotel and targeting people on the ground -- yet there was not a single strike upon pavement or walls to be seen or heard in any of the audio or video. This is evidence that cannot be avoided -- yet it is not present in any of the video and audio available. Heavy caliber strikes upon pavement cannot be avoided, yet they are not present -- not a single example in thousands of rounds fired. This isn't possible if targeting people on the ground.
One person standing nearby in video mentioned that the gunfire sounded like it was coming from the concert sound system. No one was running . . no one was screaming or panicking. No victim was seen in video to be hit by gunfire. Victims later were seen on the ground as part of the crowd moved away, yet none of the expected panic was seen at any time even after victims are apparent. When and where were they hit? These are obvious questions that people are afraid to even ask themselves. This isn't the first time that crisis actors have been used. The recent event in Buffalo shows evidence of another security exercise also.
I've had a chance to look at the video taken by the shooter in Buffalo. It appears very questionable. He has the camera in his hat and a man is shot in the head only about 2 ½ meters away as he lay on the floor. There is no blood and no sign of any wound and the man did not move or flinch. Only the gases escaping from the weapon are seen to reach the man's head as he lay there on his back. The weapon appears to be loaded with blank rounds. Before entering the supermarket, he shot 4 or 5 rounds at the window and bullet holes appeared. I saw no debris coming from the glass and today bullet holes in glass are very easy to replicate with software. He shot a lady in the parking lot and she also showed no sign of a wound as she fell down. It was a Saturday and it should be a busy day, yet there were only 4 or 5 people in the supermarket. I would be horrified by it, but it didn't seem real.
Some of these events are conducted as security exercises with a narrative provided to participants, in order to judge public response so that they can better prepare for a real event in the future. The greater overall intent is to create the perception that these events are normal today. One goal is to try and generate enough public support to make guns illegal. This will be difficult to achieve in this country. If they can create enough support from the some of the public however, then they could engage in a form of civil war if there is a big enough crisis as justification by which the entire population can be locked down by various means. War with Russia can be one way to do this, under the threat of nuclear warfare. Great efforts to defraud the election were needed in order to remove Trump, since he would likely try to avoid any war.
I realize today that we need to believe with what we can agree on with the people around us. I responded the same way about many things. It was years after 9/11 before I began to integrate my own thoughts. Learning about the corrupt nature of the medical system presented a great example of how something can be openly corrupt, easily proven, yet normalized and accepted on that basis alone -- yet cancer cures exist and other methods of fighting disease that don't require toxic and life threatening drugs with little real positive value in many cases. Normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence, so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware, lest we ever accept responsibility.
2
-
Most of these incidents have serious questions regarding the narrative and legitimacy in at least some respects -- However, people today have a shared compulsive fear of being labeled today or called a name, considered to be extreme, "alt" or any kind of label -- so that we can no longer address any issue objectively . . Let's look at Vegas as an example. There were thousands of rounds of heavy caliber fire heard on audio, fired from above in the hotel and targeting people on the ground -- yet there was not a single strike upon pavement or walls to be seen or heard in any of the video or audio. This is evidence that cannot be avoided -- yet it is not present in any of the video and audio available. Heavy caliber strikes upon pavement cannot be avoided, yet they are not present -- not a single example in thousands of rounds fired. This isn't possible if targeting people on the ground. One person standing nearby in video mentioned that the gunfire sounded like it was coming from the audio system. No one was running . . no one was screaming or panicking. No victim was seen in video to be hit by gunfire. Victims later were seen on the ground as part of the crowd moved away, yet none of the expected panic was seen at any time even after victims are apparent. When and where were they hit? These are obvious questions that people are afraid to even see for themselves. This isn't the first time that crisis actors have been used. The recent event in Buffalo shows evidence of another security exercise also.
I've had a chance to look at the video taken by the shooter in Buffalo. It appears very questionable. He has the camera in his hat and a man is shot in the head only about 2 ½ meters away as he lay on the floor. There is no blood and no sign of any wound and the man did not move or flinch. Only the gases escaping from the weapon are seen to reach the man's head as he lay there on his back. The weapon appears to be loaded with blank rounds. Before entering the supermarket, he shot 4 or 5 rounds at the window and bullet holes appeared. I saw no debris coming from the glass and today bullet holes in glass are very easy to replicate with software. He shot a lady in the parking lot and she also showed no sign of a wound as she fell down. It was a Saturday and it should be a busy day, yet there were only 4 or 5 people in the supermarket. I would be horrified by it, but it didn't seem real.
Some of these events are conducted as security exercises with a narrative provided to participants, in order to judge public response so that they can better prepare for a real event in the future. The greater overall intent is to create the perception that these events are normal today. One goal is to try and generate enough public support to make guns illegal. This will be difficult to achieve in this country. If they can create enough support from the some of the public however, then they could engage in a form of civil war if there is a big enough crisis as justification by which the entire population can be locked down by various means. War with Russia can be one way to do this, under the threat of nuclear warfare.
Great efforts to defraud the election were needed in order to remove Trump, since he would likely try to avoid any war.
I realize today that we need to believe with what we can agree on with the people around us. I responded the same way about many things. It was years after 9/11 before I began to integrate my own thoughts.
Normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence, so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware, lest we ever accept responsibility.
2
-
1
-
1