Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "New Evidence We Are Entering An Ice Age Termination Event - EXPLAINED" video.

  1. An ice age of a global nature is actually an unproven theory and may not be realistic. Inexplicably, areas known to have experienced glacial sheets cannot be shown to maintain low enough summer temperatures by which any accumulation of ice and snow would remain through summer months. If we take New York City as an example, known to have had a glacial sheet of over a mile in height, and we apply an extreme in a reduction of 30 degrees of daytime summer temperatures from the current 80s and 90s experienced today due to any possible differences in the past in ocean and air currents as well as changes of as much as 3 to 4% in solar output, with this reduction we still have summer temperatures in the 50s and 60s during which there would be no accumulation of snow and ice to remain throughout the summer. A polar location prior to a possible shift, placed in the far northern or northwestern Atlantic would create the glacial sheets known to have existed in parts of Europe and North America. No one wants to read another person's rant, but here it is . . Crisis oriented narratives that replace the scientific method exist too often primarily through assumption in repetition of supporting narratives rather than empirical evidence, not to mention fraud in evidence provided and demonstrated intent to commit fraud. CO2 is a vital molecule of life for carbon based life forms upon which we depend to feed all of life through the process of photosynthesis. To believe that it is also an ongoing threat, or the same exaggerated claim made regarding methane is beyond unrealistic and unsupportable. Climate change is managed by repetition in place of the comprehension that is dependent upon individual perspective, even while geoengineering activities continue without attention paid to them as they create regional extremes of temperature and drought that are then attributed to global warming. A doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere would be of great benefit to all as it increases plant growth and agricultural production as well as to increase oxygen respiration for human and animal life. The moderate increase in CO2 to above 0.04% is the delay by which the enormous sink of CO2 that exists in the oceans and fauna will take up the increased CO2 produced by human activity. This activity however creates an increase of the overall quantity of CO2 present in the oceans and life on Earth of such a miniscule amount that it is not measurable or predictable in practical terms. The ability to create a greenhouse warming effect would require CO2 levels in the atmosphere to reach far above the 0.8% level of toxicity for breathing. In spite of great effort to discredit the historical temperature record in the circulated information available by repetition on many sites, global mean temperatures during the medieval period were several degrees higher than at any time in the past 100 years, during which there was no flooding of coastal regions due to rising sea levels that did not occur. NASA's own reports during the 1970s referred to this as they warned of global cooling and the threat of a new ice age, while solar scientists tell us these cycles of temperature changes closely match the various solar cycles for as long as records have been kept. Developments of technologies that can produce energy without the need for fossil fuels have been kept out of public awareness as well as confiscated when developed independently -- even while climate crises are promoted to justify taking away rights and applying new taxes that do nothing to help people or the Earth.
    1