Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Trump should have run as a Democrat in order to pull the rug out from under the current left-right divide with the media on one side of it and sponsored SJW activity and social media platforms. Tulsi Gabbard is an excellent example as was JFK. She focuses on issues and holding people accountable and she may have instinctively or knowledgeably chosen to run as a democrat to diffuse the unending divide that party and ideology create. We can accomplish much more by truly being free to think for ourselves, than anything an ideology and political party can offer. Joining the "better side", regardless which one can maintain the divide permanently through useless identification and compulsive group behavior to accuse and defend, engaging the "other side" to do the same. The compulsive need to agree is the source of conflict by any point of division, by which those who have no preference beyond their own desires can take advantage in supporting both sides for a longer term outcome to their liking. This is how a corrupt world had always functioned, while most of us play right into it. Agreement based upon compulsion is an illusion that requires cult-like responses, unrecognized in shared behavior and by which we are not free then to think for ourselves beyond watching and defending one another and accusing the other side. Wars are managed into being through this process and provides support for any point of division available in class, gender, political and cultural, and religion, an original ideology to displace the center of focus and true identity and divinity . . to replace it with schizophrenic needs of focus outside of ourselves to replace in every manner of speaking, the individual perspective that is the focus of power -- by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today.
Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification.
The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis.
No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves .
There is a continuity in the evolution of human affairs and events where little of an arbitrary nature takes place. No thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means -- normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware lest we ever accept responsibility.
The elite are that group most easily managed, because they feel too important and they have no other desires. They have never initiated anything outside of their own self-serving culture of interests. Over 90 years ago, eugenics narratives and concepts were introduced and circulated among the elite, without risk, effort or expense on their part -- and then down the road many more people are brought into a similar fold by various means -- overly enthralled and impressed by these important people involved. Figureheads do not serve as a point of initiative in the networking element on the part of all involved -- where none can identify who is responsible for so much concern beyond repetition in confidentiality managed no differently than narratives given for public consumption, yet with much greater potential in ultimate deception -- unrecognized as such continuity of interests only made things worse at every step and in every possible way under similar supporting narratives in justification, yet none having the courage to look and perceive for themselves beyond that provided without risk and with substantial benefit to themselves in support.
The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of one's job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1