Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "“They Tie Them Up To a Pole” | Developing News" video.

. . if you say so . . 😃. . So Russia removing their central bank has nothing to do with the financial interests that control international central banking -- who also launder the money for the CIA -- and therefore have their hands on the information and activities for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises . . if you say so, Mr. Servo . . Our network activity in Ukraine to install that government by electoral fraud and coercive means -- is not relevant . . nor is our training of their military and providing weapons since at least 2016 -- not relevant . . if you say so -- Eight long years during bombing of Donbass and the murder of thousands of ethnic Russians -- proves Russia's efforts to find any other solution to this . .
2
. . if you say so . . 😃. . So Russia removing their central bank has nothing to do with the financial interests that control international central banking -- who also launder the money for the CIA -- and therefore have their hands on the information and activities for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises . . if you say so, Mr. Servo . . Our network activity in Ukraine to install that government by electoral fraud and coercive means -- is not relevant . . nor is our training of their military and providing weapons since at least 2016 -- not relevant . . if you say so -- Eight long years during bombing of Donbass and the murder of thousands of ethnic Russians -- proves Russia's efforts to find any other solution to this . .
2
@Bobochee . . Right . . when all of the media are in agreement, we know something is wrong . .
2
. . This was a big reason for all of the "Russia collusion" BS in order to distract from activity in Ukraine by our networks and to normalize the idea that Russia is the Bad Guy and Putin is the latest boogyman. A historical perspective serves well -- in that Gadaffi was never a terrorist and was not guilty of shooting at his own people . . while our network involvement created disruption and the excuse for the US and NATO to invade and destroy that country. Why do you think that occurred? -- Gadaffi had established gold-backed currency and a fund to support Nations of Africa -- in direct conflict with the interests who use IMF loansharking schemes in those nations -- as well as launder the money for the logistics of contraband by our networks out of Afghanistan -- while controlling central banking in nearly every other nation including ours in the form of the Fed. . a slight conflict of interest never addressed by corporate media of no journalistic integrity beyond celebrity drama -- whose controlling interests are identical to those of finance as mentioned and the laundering of money involving our networks -- and in contact with information for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises. Naivety will wait for your television to tell you something. When the media are in lock-step -- that should tell you something about the nature of any crisis . . Another example in Assad, a dentist trained in the UK -- did not return to his native country in order to become elected and then "gas his own people" -- after we create disruptions and the excuse to intervene without permission -- while Syria did request the assistance of their ally Russia, who then proceeded to clean up much of what we could not "fix" at the time with our duplicitous command structure and corrupt intel providing the excuse for our intervention in the first place without permission . . what a coincidence that Syria and Libya were 2 of only 3 or 4 nations worldwide who did not have central banking by such international interests of finance and would not allow pipelines to pass through -- with all of the corrupt influence that come with it. Independence of any real kind is risky business for anyone to attempt today.
1
. . This was a big reason for all of the "Russia collusion" BS in order to distract from activity in Ukraine by our networks and to normalize the idea that Russia is the Bad Guy and Putin is the latest boogyman. A historical perspective serves well -- in that Gadaffi was never a terrorist and was not guilty of shooting at his own people . . while our network involvement created disruption and the excuse for the US and NATO to invade and destroy that country. Why do you think that occurred? -- Gadaffi had established gold-backed currency and a fund to support Nations of Africa -- in direct conflict with the interests who use IMF loansharking schemes in those nations -- as well as launder the money for the logistics of contraband by our networks out of Afghanistan -- while controlling central banking in nearly every other nation including ours in the form of the Fed. . a slight conflict of interest never addressed by corporate media of no journalistic integrity beyond celebrity drama -- whose controlling interests are identical to those of finance as mentioned and the laundering of money involving our networks -- and in contact with information for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises. Naivety will wait for your television to tell you something. When the media are in lock-step -- that should tell you something about the nature of any crisis . . Another example in Assad, a dentist trained in the UK -- did not return to his native country in order to become elected and then "gas his own people" -- after we create disruptions and the excuse to intervene without permission -- while Syria did request the assistance of their ally Russia, who then proceeded to clean up much of what we could not "fix" at the time with our duplicitous command structure and corrupt intel providing the excuse for our intervention in the first place without permission . . what a coincidence that Syria and Libya were 2 of only 3 or 4 nations worldwide who did not have central banking by such international interests of finance and would not allow pipelines to pass through -- with all of the corrupt influence that come with it. Independence of any real kind is risky business for anyone to attempt today.
1
. . This was a big reason for all of the "Russia collusion" BS in order to distract from activity in Ukraine by our networks and to normalize the idea that Russia is the Bad Guy and Putin is the latest boogyman. A historical perspective serves well -- in that Gadaffi was never a terrorist and was not guilty of shooting at his own people . . while our network involvement created disruption and the excuse for the US and NATO to invade and destroy that country. Why do you think that occurred? -- Gadaffi had established gold-backed currency and a fund to support Nations of Africa -- in direct conflict with the interests who use IMF loansharking schemes in those nations -- as well as launder the money for the logistics of contraband by our networks out of Afghanistan -- while controlling central banking in nearly every other nation including ours in the form of the Fed. . a slight conflict of interest never addressed by corporate media of no journalistic integrity beyond celebrity drama -- whose controlling interests are identical to those of finance as mentioned and the laundering of money involving our networks -- and in contact with information for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises. Naivety will wait for your television to tell you something. When the media are in lock-step -- that should tell you something about the nature of any crisis . . Another example in Assad, a dentist trained in the UK -- did not return to his native country in order to become elected and then "gas his own people" -- after we create disruptions and the excuse to intervene without permission -- while Syria did request the assistance of their ally Russia, who then proceeded to clean up much of what we could not "fix" at the time with our duplicitous command structure and corrupt intel providing the excuse for our intervention in the first place without permission . . what a coincidence that Syria and Libya were 2 of only 3 or 4 nations worldwide who did not have central banking by such international interests of finance and would not allow pipelines to pass through -- with all of the corrupt influence that come with it. Independence of any real kind is risky business for anyone to attempt today.
1
. . if you say so . . 😃. . if the media doesn't say we were there -- yeah, your right . . we weren't there, when Hillary said, "We came -- We saw -- He died" . . Yeah I guess she lied again . .
1
@factsdontcareaboutyourfeel7204 . . LOL . . 😃-- and what did Hillary say? . . "We came -- We saw -- He died" . . referring to Gadaffi. So you are telling me that we were not there? Our networks and elements of our military were there and relevant to the insurrection caused by our activity. Hillary is taking claim for it . . So Hillary is lying again, you say? . . LOL . . Nice try, Mr. "Facts" . .
1
@factsdontcareaboutyourfeel7204 . . ahh -- so you are selective in what you'll accept from Hillary -- she brags about our involvement -- and no one in the government or media questions her claims -- Ok . . we weren't there then -- LOL . . if you say so . . 😃. .
1
@factsdontcareaboutyourfeel7204 . . LOL . . Mr. Facts -- 😃. . When Hillary brags about doing something evil -- in the destruction of a formerly prosperous nation -- we should take her seriously -- unless you don't care about the destruction of lives and genocide that took place afterward against many black people by those we provoked and supported -- You tell me what the reality is -- Mr. Facts . . We are waiting for your response --
1
. . This was a big reason for all of the "Russia collusion" BS in order to distract from activity in Ukraine by our networks and to normalize the idea that Russia is the Bad Guy and Putin is the latest boogyman. A historical perspective serves well -- in that Gadaffi was never a terrorist and was not guilty of shooting at his own people . . while our network involvement created disruption and the excuse for the US and NATO to invade and destroy that country. Why do you think that occurred? -- Gadaffi had established gold-backed currency and a fund to support Nations of Africa -- in direct conflict with the interests who use IMF loansharking schemes in those nations -- as well as launder the money for the logistics of contraband by our networks out of Afghanistan -- while controlling central banking in nearly every other nation including ours in the form of the Fed. . a slight conflict of interest never addressed by corporate media of no journalistic integrity beyond celebrity drama -- whose controlling interests are identical to those of finance as mentioned and the laundering of money involving our networks -- and in contact with information for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises. Naivety will wait for your television to tell you something. When the media are in lock-step -- that should tell you something about the nature of any crisis . . Another example in Assad, a dentist trained in the UK -- did not return to his native country in order to become elected and then "gas his own people" -- after we create disruptions and the excuse to intervene without permission -- while Syria did request the assistance of their ally Russia, who then proceeded to clean up much of what we could not "fix" at the time with our duplicitous command structure and corrupt intel providing the excuse for our intervention in the first place without permission . . what a coincidence that Syria and Libya were 2 of only 3 or 4 nations worldwide who did not have central banking by such international interests of finance and would not allow pipelines to pass through -- with all of the corrupt influence that come with it. Independence of any real kind is risky business for anyone to attempt today.
1
. . if you say so . . 😃. . So Russia removing their central bank has nothing to do with the financial interests that control international central banking -- who also launder the money for the CIA -- and therefore have their hands on the information and activities for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises . . if you say so, Mr. Servo . . Our network activity in Ukraine to install that government by electoral fraud and coercive means -- is not relevant . . nor is our training of their military and providing weapons since at least 2016 -- not relevant . . if you say so -- Eight long years during bombing of Donbass and the murder of thousands of ethnic Russians -- proves Russia's efforts to find any other solution to this . .
1
@lembergnative7731 . . 😃. . turn off your television -- and gain your own clue . . The individual perspective is the focus of power, by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves . .
1
. . This was a big reason for all of the "Russia collusion" BS in order to distract from activity in Ukraine by our networks and to normalize the idea that Russia is the Bad Guy and Putin is the latest boogyman. A historical perspective serves well -- in that Gadaffi was never a terrorist and was not guilty of shooting at his own people . . while our network involvement created disruption and the excuse for the US and NATO to invade and destroy that country. Why do you think that occurred? -- Gadaffi had established gold-backed currency and a fund to support Nations of Africa -- in direct conflict with the interests who use IMF loansharking schemes in those nations -- as well as launder the money for the logistics of contraband by our networks out of Afghanistan -- while controlling central banking in nearly every other nation including ours in the form of the Fed. . a slight conflict of interest never addressed by corporate media of no journalistic integrity beyond celebrity drama -- whose controlling interests are identical to those of finance as mentioned and the laundering of money involving our networks -- and in contact with information for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises. Naivety will wait for your television to tell you something. When the media are in lock-step -- that should tell you something about the nature of any crisis . . Another example in Assad, a dentist trained in the UK -- did not return to his native country in order to become elected and then "gas his own people" -- after we create disruptions and the excuse to intervene without permission -- while Syria did request the assistance of their ally Russia, who then proceeded to clean up much of what we could not "fix" at the time with our duplicitous command structure and corrupt intel providing the excuse for our intervention in the first place without permission . . what a coincidence that Syria and Libya were 2 of only 3 or 4 nations worldwide who did not have central banking by such international interests of finance and would not allow pipelines to pass through -- with all of the corrupt influence that come with it. Independence of any real kind is risky business for anyone to attempt today.
1
. . if you say so . . 😃. . So Russia removing their central bank has nothing to do with the financial interests that control international central banking -- who also launder the money for the CIA -- and therefore have their hands on the information and activities for which we go to war and engage in activities that lead to war and other crises . . if you say so, Mr. Servo . . Our network activity in Ukraine to install that government by electoral fraud and coercive means -- is not relevant . . nor is our training of their military and providing weapons since at least 2016 -- not relevant . . if you say so -- Eight long years during bombing of Donbass and the murder of thousands of ethnic Russians -- proves Russia's efforts to find any other solution to this . .
1