Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "The Faux Documentary That 'Proves' Kubrick Faked the Moon Landing" video.

  1. Americanism without forethought will defend the indefensible. . The technology displayed fails at every turn. . Even suit technology cannot hold up under scrutiny. Near Earth orbit is a reality, but much has been done to cover for advanced technology that has nothing to do with a backyard overgrown mousetrap masquerading as 6 billion dollar hardware [1960's valuation that translates to 30-40 billion dollars today] for the lunar module -- with such high tech as double strength aluminum foil over aluminum framework. If this was legitimate, titanium would have been used to create a true pressure vessel for one third atmosphere pressurization with a degree of safety and no inherent stress points in thin foil sheet over angular framework that would have bulged like a mylar party balloon that has much less pressure. At 5 psi, hundreds of square inches across aluminum sheeting create literally thousands of pounds of accumulated force, much of which will concentrate at stress points in flat sheet. The same problem occurs for suit pressurization as cumulative force in all directions at 5 psi is exerted against hundreds of square inches of suit material for each limb, and will seek to maintain shape under pressure and restrict movement to a great degree. For these potential difficulties -- we instead see errant bubbles occasionally escape from the neck ring where the helmet is attached when astronauts are working outside the ISS, using the identical equipment provided for them in the training pools designed to replicate gravity -- while suit pressure need only maintain equal or slightly greater pressure than the water around them as a diver underwater who experiences no restriction in a full body suit while water pressure at any depth is essentially equal to suit pressure. Light control and green screen background are all that is necessary when everything else has been replicated for training purposes. For those who would deny that multiple sources are used in layered video, more than once we have the astronauts experience a glitch while aboard the ISS with distortion over their entire image while the background remains unaffected. This can only occur when using multiple sources. There is a risk when using layered video and multiple sources, that something unexpected can occur -- allowing us to see something that has no legitimate explanation according to what we've been led to believe. In a world of corruption, there are no conspiracies.
    1