Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today.
Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification.
The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis.
No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves.
Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
1