Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "Joe Rogan on the Moon Landing Conspiracy" video.

  1. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    2
  2. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    2
  3. It's interesting how we may accept the oversize design of the F1 engine and its flawless record in spite of the inherent difficulties that cannot be fixed through the use of baffles as stated in revisionist efforts to justify the official record. Near-Earth orbit is a reality while the moon lay over one thousand times further distant so that the original F1 engine would not be necessary to reach orbit with a reduced fuel load and stripped down mission requirement. Did they leave near-Earth orbit? . . As we see Earth from over half the distance to the moon, and we see blue light flooding in through the window -- when only a moment before, the Earth was far distant in what appears to be very low light conditions . . and it was very interesting to see straight line formations of cloud fronts extending for over 6000 miles across the earth -- something that has never occurred in the meteorological record . . framed by the round window of the command module with a much smaller portion of the Earth's surface in view under greatly reduced exposure settings. When those exposure settings return to normal in the unedited version, as the camera continued to roll, we see a large amount of light flooding in through the same window, the only source of which can be the Earth without a change in orientation of the spacecraft while in orbit.
    2
  4. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  5. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  6. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  7. It's interesting how we may accept the oversize design of the F1 engine and its flawless record in spite of the inherent difficulties that cannot be fixed through the use of baffles as stated in revisionist efforts to justify the official record. Near-Earth orbit is a reality while the moon lay over one thousand times further distant so that the original F1 engine would not be necessary to reach orbit with a reduced fuel load and stripped down mission requirement. Did they leave near-Earth orbit? . . As we see Earth from over half the distance to the moon, and we see blue light flooding in through the window -- when only a moment before, the Earth was far distant in what appears to be very low light conditions . . and it was very interesting to see straight line formations of cloud fronts extending for over 6000 miles across the earth -- something that has never occurred in the meteorological record . . framed by the round window of the command module with a much smaller portion of the Earth's surface in view under greatly reduced exposure settings. When those exposure settings return to normal in the unedited version, as the camera continued to roll, we see a large amount of light flooding in through the same window, the only source of which can be the Earth without a change in orientation of the spacecraft while in orbit.
    1
  8. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  9. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  10. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  11. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  12.  @SeanCasey84  . . "unnecessary nonsense" . . 😃. . if you say so . . Here it is again for your enjoyment -- Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review. Normalized human behavior and acceptance are the means -- normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware lest we ever accept responsibility. The elite are that group most easily managed, because they feel too important and they have no other desires. They have never initiated anything outside of their own self-serving culture of interests. Over 90 years ago, eugenics narratives and concepts were introduced and circulated among the elite, without risk, effort or expense on their part to give them a sense of purpose -- and then down the road many more people are brought into a similar fold by various means within the networking environment -- overly enthralled and impressed by these important people involved. Figureheads do not serve as a point of initiative in the networking element on the part of all involved -- where none can identify who is responsible for so much concern beyond repetition in confidentiality managed no differently than narratives given for public consumption, yet with much greater potential in ultimate deception -- unrecognized as such continuity of interests only made things worse at every step and in every possible way under similar supporting narratives in justification, yet none having the courage to look and perceive for themselves beyond that provided without risk and with substantial benefit to themselves in support. The eugenicist's philosophical insider's perspective originates from those influences that have proven time and again that concern is not in existence but for the control and augmentation and stasis of power -- however addictive such perspective may be. To buy any conscientious philosophy at the level from which conscience is disdained and entirely outside of the culture is to buy delusion wholesale, regardless of one's job or social position. Consensus is a powerful motivator that requires no other confirmation or justification .
    1
  13. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  14. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  15. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  16. ​ @yingle6027 ​. . "Biggest word salad" . . Like our other friend, awareness is a threat to some and your approach reveals that you have nothing to offer but disruption. Repeated attempts are from those who don't like the light shown by which all become more focused rather than responding compulsively as a group. Division is only possible when the individual can be taken out of the process in group behavior and identification, a fear-based response. You support a similar approach.
    1
  17.  @yingle6027  . . "Real intelligence is getting to the point quickly" . . 😃. . In other words, you're only willing to engage in any real thought or consideration -- if it's packaged in a perfectly limited sound-bite, so that you won't need any real effort in thought of your own -- or to disrupt the continuity of useless information with limited value as you move on . . comfort is our first priority, and risk aversion to serve that need in group oriented behavior and identification -- repetition to establish a safe zone by which we can function without fear of accusation beyond political preference. This is the means of division by which the individual is removed from the process, that we are not involved on an individual basis in thought and initiative. Initiative equates to responsibility, something that we so much want to avoid today that we no longer require it on the part of anyone. We only require the circulation of information so that we feel safe enough to participate without fear of accusation in group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by any point of division, by which we are not free to think for ourselves as we watch one another and as we accuse the other side of any point of division, and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. Normalization rather than conspiracy is how influence and corruption create and take precedence, so that awareness is hostage to the needs for anything other than ourselves to define what is real and acceptable -- the need for any form of consensus to rule us unaware lest we ever accept responsibility. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves.
    1
  18. It's interesting how we may accept the oversize design of the F1 engine and its flawless record in spite of the inherent difficulties that cannot be fixed through the use of baffles as stated in revisionist efforts to justify the official record. Near-Earth orbit is a reality while the moon lay over one thousand times further distant so that the original F1 engine would not be necessary to reach orbit with a reduced fuel load and stripped down mission requirement. Did they leave near-Earth orbit? . . As we see Earth from over half the distance to the moon, and we see blue light flooding in through the window -- when only a moment before, the Earth was far distant in what appears to be very low light conditions . . and it was very interesting to see straight line formations of cloud fronts extending for over 6000 miles across the earth -- something that has never occurred in the meteorological record . . framed by the round window of the command module with a much smaller portion of the Earth's surface in view under greatly reduced exposure settings. When those exposure settings return to normal in the unedited version, as the camera continued to roll, we see a large amount of light flooding in through the same window, the only source of which can be the Earth without a change in orientation of the spacecraft while in orbit.
    1
  19.  @yingle6027  . . "Be efficient with your words" . . 😃. . Perhaps you can get a different job so that you are able to choose what you wish to read . . Sponsored activity in the forums is very normal today for commercial and political purposes and subjects of controversy -- in the attempt to lead public debate.
    1
  20.  @yingle6027  . . "Another word salad from you. Don't understand" . . if only you were here of your own initiative -- your potential . . Sponsored activity in the forums is very normal today for commercial and political purposes and subjects of controversy -- in the attempt to lead public debate.
    1
  21. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  22. It's interesting how we may accept the oversize design of the F1 engine and its flawless record in spite of the inherent difficulties that cannot be fixed through the use of baffles as stated in revisionist efforts to justify the official record. Near-Earth orbit is a reality while the moon lay over one thousand times further distant so that the original F1 engine would not be necessary to reach orbit with a reduced fuel load and stripped down mission requirement. Did they leave near-Earth orbit? . . As we see Earth from over half the distance to the moon, and we see blue light flooding in through the window -- when only a moment before, the Earth was far distant in what appears to be very low light conditions . . and it was very interesting to see straight line formations of cloud fronts extending for over 6000 miles across the earth -- something that has never occurred in the meteorological record . . framed by the round window of the command module with a much smaller portion of the Earth's surface in view under greatly reduced exposure settings. When those exposure settings return to normal in the unedited version, as the camera continued to roll, we see a large amount of light flooding in through the same window, the only source of which can be the Earth without a change in orientation of the spacecraft while in orbit.
    1
  23. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  24. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1
  25. Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
    1