General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Ronald Greene
New York Post
comments
Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "New York Post" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Sponsored efforts to discredit inquiry fail to provide an answer.
5
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. In place of an answer, we expect more derogatory responses.
3
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Sponsored efforts to discredit inquiry fail to provide an answer.
3
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Sponsored efforts to discredit inquiry fail to provide an answer.
3
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Sponsored efforts to discredit inquiry fail to provide an answer.
2
โย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . "that doesn't happen in all conditions" . . ๐ . . Thank you for your sponsored reply, Mark. Tell us then, what conditions will eliminate the turbulence behind a 500 mph aircraft? You have a desperate need to create doubt. I believe you succeeded, because all will seriously doubt that you can demonstrate any condition that will eliminate the tornado-like winds and vortex air currents behind a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . We'll wait for your educated response.
2
โย @markh1011ย . . A 500 mph large passenger airliner and zero wake turbulence in the smoke and fire, Mark -- Where is it? . . ๐
2
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Sponsored efforts to discredit inquiry fail to provide an answer.
2
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. In place of an answer, we expect more derogatory responses.
2
โย @Onecommentableย . . "you people " . . ๐ . . Versus individual perspective and our capacity to think and consider. Where is the turbulent wake of a 500 MPH large passenger airliner that would entirely disrupt and disperse the smoke and fire seconds after passing? We see the indications of the imperfect nature of the projection technology used as the wing of an aircraft disappears against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle the same aircraft is seen passing behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Upon close inspection, no debris in the breakup of thin aluminum structures are seen upon impact with steel columns of the building. Conspiracy is not a word that has relevance to any inquiry as it remains to the prosecutor in any case whether he include such charges. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court, where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no consideration may remain on an individual basis.
2
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Sponsored efforts to discredit inquiry fail to provide an answer.
2
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Sponsored efforts to discredit inquiry fail to provide an answer.
1
โย @MikeM275ย . . "there is no wake turbulence unless a plane is actually flying" . . ๐ . . Experienced pilots don't agree with you, Mike as they tell us these vortex air currents can last for up to several minutes and must be avoided by other aircraft. Yet we see no turbulence whatsoever in the path of a 500 mph large passenger airliner just seconds later in the smoke and fire covering the impact zone . . something impossible to avoid, as the laws of physics remain in effect with even much greater turbulence at 500 mph, more than double the normal speed at low altitude.
1
โย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . Since you cannot offer an explanation of the inexplicable lack of turbulence behind a 500 mph large passenger airliner -- We'll wait while you desperately avoid an answer.
1
โย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . And we'll wait forever as you avoid the original question. If you explain the lack of turbulence behind a 500 mph large passenger airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later -- I'll then provide the name of the video that shows indications of errors in the projection technology used. I see that I'll have no need to search as you avoid an explanation, while many have already seen the video described.
1
โย @markh1011ย . . Wake turbulence in the smoke and fire, Mark -- Where is it? . . ๐
1
โโย @markh1011ย . . "You're making the claim that something is missing. I'm waiting for you to back this up" . . LOL . . ๐ . . Thank you for your sponsored reply. You are hoping that no one decides to look for themselves -- and see the complete lack of any turbulence in the smoke and fire seconds later -- in any video showing either tower? . . "Backed up" and checkmate, Mark. Give us another diversion. We'll wait .
1
โย @markh1011ย . . " I'm waiting for you to back them up" . . ๐ . . Thank you again for your sponsored reply, Mark . . LOL. You are a desperate rehash as everyone has seen the smoke and fire only seconds after the passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner. Everyone has seen the complete lack of turbulence and can go back and confirm for themselves. "back it up" . . "back it up" LOL, You have lost, Mark. You can only continue to cry, " Back it up!" as you have no real answer. All have eyes to see. We can continue this forever, Mark . . I'm willing, and as long as you're getting a paycheck . . We'll wait and we'll continue. If there is a delay, well I have a real job . .
1
โย @markh1011ย . . Yes, we'll wait Mark. True desperation in your great efforts here. However, you lost Mark, and it's only a game of repetition and to get the last word . . Did you get the last word, Mark? . . Smoke and fire seconds later at both towers -- zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Repetition is in my favor when I return to repeat word for word what all eyes can see . . scored, Mark. Go for the last word -- for now We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โ@markh1011 . . "Troll logic" . . ๐ . . In the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers -- zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Repetition is in my favor to repeat word for word what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โ@markh1011 . . ๐ . . Thank you for your sponsored reply. Desperation speaks, Mark. So -- In the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers -- zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Repetition is in my favor to repeat word for word what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โย @markh1011ย . . ๐ . . Yes -- In the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers -- Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Repetition is in my favor to repeat word for word what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โย @markh1011ย . . "another dodge" . . ๐ . . Thank you for your sponsored reply, Mark. Yes -- In the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers -- Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Repetition is in my favor to repeat word for word what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โ@MarkH-cu9zi . . " trolling at evading" . . ๐ . . Thank you for your sponsored reply, Mark. So -- In the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers -- Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Repetition is in my favor -- to repeat word for word what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark . .
1
โ@MarkH-cu9zi . . ๐ . . In case I failed to mention it -- Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Yes -- in the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers . . Repetition is in my favor -- to repeat word for word -- what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โ@MarkH-cu9zi . . ๐ . . Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Yes -- in the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers . . Repetition is in my favor -- to repeat word for word -- what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . Take notice of the desperation in meaningless arguments against the obvious lack of turbulence -- It really is entertaining, Mark . . Dude . . if only you were here of your own initiative . .
1
โย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . Oh -- and by the way -- ๐ . . Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Yes -- in the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers . . Repetition is in my favor -- to repeat word for word -- what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . "By this point it seems you may be a bot" . . If you say so, Mark . . ๐ . . Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Yes -- in the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers . . Repetition is in my favor -- to repeat word for word -- what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . " you've already lost bot" . . ๐ . . Thank you for your sponsored reply, Mark. Yes -- In the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers -- Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Repetition is in my favor -- to repeat word for word -- what all eyes can see . . Take notice of the desperation in meaningless arguments against the obvious lack of turbulence -- that would entirely disperse the smoke and flame after the passing of a very fast large passenger airliner. We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
โย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . "you've yet to make an argument " . . ๐ . . Thank you for your sponsored reply, Mark . . Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Yes -- in the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers . . Repetition is in my favor -- to repeat word for word -- what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark. If only you were here of your own initiative . .
1
ย @MarkH-cu9ziย . . And -- in case I failed to mention it . . ๐ . . Zero turbulence after passage of a 500 mph large passenger airliner . . Yes -- in the smoke and fire seconds later at both towers . . Repetition is in my favor -- to repeat word for word -- what all eyes can see . . We appreciate your sponsored activity here, Mark.
1
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. Sponsored efforts to discredit inquiry fail to provide an answer.
1
Where is the wake turbulence behind a 500 mph large airliner in the smoke and fire only seconds later? Even the wake of a small Cessna aircraft would be very noticeable -- yet there is nothing. Experienced pilots and flight enthusiasts are well aware of wake turbulence and the need for other aircraft to avoid it when it can break the wing off of small aircraft or send it diving toward the ground. Such turbulence can last for up to several minutes, even at normal speeds of 200+ mph -- yet there is nothing. We see the indications of imperfect projection technology as a wing disappears on camera against the bright blue sky. From another camera angle, we see the same aircraft pass behind a crane in the foreground, yet in front of the heavy crane cable. In place of an answer, we expect more derogatory responses.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All