Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "The Beginning of Everything -- The Big Bang" video.
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm .
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm .
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm .
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm .
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm .
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
1
-
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
The true revelations are concerning a conception of the universe which is not dependent upon 3D time based cosmology requiring a specified starting point a la the "Big Bang", but rather the awareness that the perception and illusion of time as well as space breaks down at the macro as well as the micro level where solidity reveals itself as focused energy, and this projected from another realm or dimension of existence, while space as well as time is a limitless realm in alignment with the unlimited nature of greater reality -- as we travel to the edge of what we see as the visible universe, this opens up new horizons, possibilities and probabilities as the horizon is extended and there exists a potentially unlimited number of galaxies, stars and planets. What is possible is likely to have occurred and does so according to our traverse to engage that reality, whether at our present level of consciousness or a hightened vibratory level incorporating a greater multi-dimensional awareness. We live as multi-dimensional beings and we cannot exist otherwise, for we are more than a projection of energy into this realm.
1
-
1