Comments by "Ronald Greene" (@ronaldgreene5733) on "Big Think" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11.  @ruthc382  . . Funds for research and other projects must follow the accepted current created by continued efforts to push points of view that are given mainstream attention in the press and supported by those scientists who are elevated in this process of ongoing crisis management [ongoing crises serve through division by any means, something that is increasingly apparent as corporate funds are involved in Antifa and BLM groups as well as the few "white supremacist" groups created for this purpose -- These are in reality less extreme today, or no one would join them]. This kind of influence also serves in other institutions of science, such as when human remains are found in burial sites that lay in or below geological strata that is demonstrated to be several million years older than what current theory dictates. Rather than accept the new evidence according to its merits, the scientists involved are often discredited and ignored, or excuses are created in an attempt to discredit the evidence. For this subject, look for the book by Michael Cremo called Forbidden Archeology. The subject matter of global warming AKA climate change is no different. The underlying agenda is eugenics based so that most or all scientists in support of the global warming agenda in fact know that it is not viable but believe in "saving the planet" by drastic means of toxification through various methods in order to bring about a severe population reduction. This philosophy has been in effect for 90+ years and began to be implemented in a big way in the 40's using the war in order to justify the introduction and normalization of toxic preservatives for example [after the banning of non-toxic preservatives like boric acid] and heavy use of pesticides, nitrates and other agricultural chemicals. This process continued as the chemical industry was used to provide toxic solutions to many other industries in a process of normalization so that we grew to accept many things without questioning their effect upon our lives and the environment. Now those in the know [some scientists for example] are led to believe that these developments are part of the human scourge that must be eliminated, when in fact this toxification and normalization process has been occurring in a scourge as such that has been perpetrated upon people. Such corrupt influence for many decades could very well promote the benign development of chemical and biological solutions, such as some who have taken the initiative in that regard in recent decades. When the most powerful interests in terms of money and influence play both sides of this game of environmental morality for their benefit alone, this is clearly not a sign of sincerity for anyone who can look beyond their immediate role in whether they get funding, or whether one accepts the latest media report. Even worse is being perpetrated now in the form of geoengineering as a real threat to the Earth and environment through the massive aerosol spraying of toxic nano aluminum, barium compounds and other toxic substances that fill the air downwind as well as accumulate in the soil over time. This also involves the use of convergent frequencies in a corruption of technologies developed by Nikola Tesla in order to manipulate the weather and geology of the Earth. Those who control portions of our government in this process are also those who use global warming / climate change as a cover for these activities with the nominal intent of distributing such material in the atmosphere in order to reflect sunlight back out into space. NASA data conflicts with such efforts as it demonstrates no increase in mean global temperatures since the 1990's. When covering the global warming agenda, the great amount of corruption involved is also ignored by the media, involving cherry picked data and the email scandal revealing this intent and the suppression of a much warmer period [by several degrees] several hundred years ago, during which no flooding occurred in coastal cities from rising sea levels that did not take place.
    1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1