Comments by "Regis" (@Timbo5000) on "" video.

  1.  @EpicMRPancake  Saudi Arabia was made into what it is today by the Americans, literally from day one. They have supported the Saudis since the very beginning and collaborated to extract oil. America's foreing policy is NOT based on "spreading democracy". It has enacted more coup d'etats that ended in installing US-friendly dictators than it expelled dictators in favour of democracy. US foreign policy is based on keeping the petrodollar alive (which essentially means the dollar will always be strong currency, which makes the US economy very easy to maintain). If you didn't know, countries across the globe are more or less forced to buy oil with dollars. This keeps demand for dollars perpetually high. This means that the US central bank can get away with printing dollars to a great degree without heavy inflation. The US sometimes even prints free money for their allies in the EU, Japan, etc. After the 2008 crisis the US federal reserve essentially printed money and gave it out through so-called swap lines to the EU and other allies. So you make sure your allies in this petrodollar scheme also benefit every so often. But the petrodollar also means that once the demand for the dollar collapses, the US economy is in for a wild ride as the dollar collapses with the demand. Countries that don't comply with this petrodollar idea and sell their oil for other currency are Russia (rubles), Iran (euros), pre-invasion Syria (euros, I think), pre-invasion Iraq (euros), China (yuan) and pre-invasion Libya (wanted to create a new African currency). If enough countries ditch the petrodollar idea, demand for the dollar will collapse and the US economy would be in serious trouble. Up until now, every country that opposed the petrodollar has either been outright invaded or bombarded with economic and political sanctions. Saudi Arabia is not a target for regime change because they're a US ally in this, simple as that. They're an important ally in the petrodollar scheme and are a huge Western arms buyer. After Kashoggi, the EU decided to not sell any more arms to Saudi Arabia. That means they've given up billions upon billions of euros based on principle. The US not only won't do this, but they'll actively overthrow otherwise stable countries purely for their own political interests. Toppling Gaddafi was "necessary" to protect both the petrodollar and French monetary interests in Africa (the francophone African countries use a French currency), because he wanted to sell oil for another currency and wanted to create a pan-African currency for African economic independence.
    2
  2.  @donaldb.9995  Well said, except I'm sceptical of what you said about Venezuela. America's aversion against them and will to install a new leader there is clear, but the situation they're in right now was largely caused by their own economics. They essentially redirected oil money towards the population (not a bad thing in itself) without reinvesting into the economy. Their entire wealth was based on oil and since the oil price collapsed they've been hit extremely hard. America is using this situation to get a coup d'etat done and probably has a hand in worsening the situation, but I wouldn't say what is happening now in Venezuela truly is due to the US. They failed to diversify their economy. Which is a shame because they did have the opportunity to do so. As for the rest, I agree but don't know about the role of zionists in all this. What exactly their goal is and the degree to which they influence America is unclear to me. If I look at America's foreign policy I mainly see the military industrial complex and petrodollar politics at work, not so much zionism. But perhaps you could elaborate on that.
    1