Comments by "Regis" (@Timbo5000) on "Hitler's Socialism | Destroying the Denialist Counter Arguments" video.

@Bhigr Bond First you research, THEN you doubt. You don't doubt first and go on youtube pestering people to do the research for you. So go on, do your research, come back and present why you think the consensus on this issue is wrong, THEN you may expect a response. That's how science works. The evidence is readily available, go look it up. And insofar you've already read up on the holocaust, still don't agree with the consensus, but come on YT simply saying you think it's wrong without evidence, I have another nice saying for you: That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
3
@Bhigr Bond Evidence is readily available in books, go read them. It's not my job to educate you. Holocaust denial is ONLY allowed when you read the proper evidence and provide a well-researched counter argument to it, with proper sources underlying it. Nothing else is permitted. ONLY scientific criticism. So do that, or go away.
2
@Bhigr Bond You don't understand that Declaration at all. I guess according to you article 3 ("Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.") means the death penalty or even the police shooting criminals is illegal because it takes lives, prison sentences are illegal because they limit liberty, etc..... The UDHR doesn't work like this. Hell, the UDHR doesn't even have legal power in any country. It's exclusively used as a basis to prosecute extreme breaches of human rights without specific laws prohibiting it, to counter the "I just followed orders/the law" arguments of Nazis. The UDHR just indicates the vague existence of universal human rights, floating somewhere above all legal structures. Meaning that following the law under a Nazi system doesn't mean you escape punishment for serious cirme because "well I didn't breach any law in my country". Nobody can derive any specific rights from the UDHR. The UDHR is deliberately vague and without any legal power. America already breached half of it within seconds of signing the thing, with its segregation, torture, the US constitution slavery as "illegal except for prisoners", etc. No such thing as absolute freedom of speech exists. In virtually the entire world, it's limited. In most of the world, hate speech is not allowed. And for good reason. And as a side note, even in countries where holocaust denial is illegal, it's NOT illegal in a scientific context . So if you in good faith want to challenge the views on the holocaust and provide proper evidence to support your views, it's allowed. People like you, who just spout denialist talking points are RIGHTLY BANNED.
1