Comments by "looseycanon" (@looseycanon) on "Managed VS Unmanaged Switches and Support For InterVLAN Routing / Layer Three Switch Routing" video.
-
Man, that IRL is so damn true! Look at my network, My ER-X is my primary gateway, At first, I thought, that I would go from it to a wireless bridge to get internet in to our garage directly... Well, nope. Dad wouldn't let me run enough cables to the kitchen, which has direct line of sight and is the only such place, plus I needed to add second AP in the kitchen to cover surrounding rooms. Because of this, I had to go with UAP-AC-Pro for coverage (I know, hillarious overkill for five wireless stations at a time max), because it has passthrough port. So now, when I want to go on the Internet from the garage, say for some video tutorial, I have to go ER-X > Zyxel 1900-24E > PoE injector > UAP-AC-Pro > Zyxel 1200-5 > PoE injector > Ubiquiti NanoM5 > Ubiquiti NanoLocoM2 > Ubiquiti NanoLocoM2 > PoE injector > Zyxel 1200-5 > PoE injector > UAP-AC-Lite. That's three switches and five different APs in a row.
1
-
1
-
@michaeljaques77 Well, it depands. If you want to run captive portal for guests, then controller is required 24/7, otherwise, no.
The controller is not just an interface, but APs, switches and gateways from UniFi family can work without it, once they're set up.
I personaly believe that on premisis controller is the best choice, but, controller software has trouble with power outages, so unless you're willing to buy Gen2 cloud key, or go cloud, you would need UPS to make sure, that nothing bad happens to the controller, while it is running. The biggest benefit of controller running 24/7 is that you see your network performance and thus can better handle your network better. Another benefit lies in automated updates of your APs. But, you can run it only when configuring new equipment and then turning it off too, in which case, Raspberry Pi would be the best choice for platform for the controller.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1