Viktor\x27 vonthe Rhaefnhyrst, I
PsycHacks
comments
Comments by "Viktor\x27 vonthe Rhaefnhyrst, I" (@Viktor_vonthe_Rhaefnhyrst) on "How to have a FULFILLING SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP, or: in praise of 24-hour diners" video.
7
@abhinavchauhan7864
Ideally, a man is not a partner who compromises with the woman that chose him and his direction in the interdependence and child rearing marriage is for. A partner suggests equality, but women cannot be equal to men because they aren't men.
It is his job to be the provider, protector, and patriarch and by compromising with his wife, he demonstrates that he's not in charge, despite bearing the brunt of responsibility and authority in the family; that's called a slave.
The moment a woman accepts marriage to a man, that is the LAST free choice she gets, save the choice to walk away, because she surrendered all other choices when she chose a man to lead her. This implicit element to male-female relationships is critical to their stability and women will NOT respect you if you cede ground because that shows your inability to lead.
This man is an idiot. Either they're having sex or he's having sex but, unless she's willing to divorce him, she's signed away the right to say "NO". That's all there is to it.
2
2
@rosiemackenzie5976
I have standards in conversing with people with separate approaches for males and females, befitting their distinction as genders. While I often assume maleness in those whom I engage--given that most YouTubers, both content creators and consumers are statistically likely to be male--when it is evident I'm dealing with a FEmale, I'm compelled, by the standards I keep, to interact accordingly.
You are either in a man's charge (in a relationship or, if single, the responsibility of your father) or you're what I term "adrift", an orphan without patriarch or male better. Given you're most likely in a man's charge, beyond my ability to ascertain your relationship and redirect you to him and explain my need to, I cannot continue to hold dialogue.
In essence, you're not mine to fraternize with. I will, from time to time, shame, admonish, or praise females without the presence of their men but, this is ultimately out of respect to those men or a reminder of their need to better train their lessers.
So, until you answer my questions, I am not at liberty to indulge you, child. Far be it from me to tread another man's territory or interfere with his property.
2
2
1
1