Comments by "Goose" (@goose7574) on "C-SPAN" channel.

@trudyauletta7554 So true! I really hope that they get to the bottom of the REAL COLLUSION & OBSTRUCTION! I still don't understand how she didn't get OBSTRUCTION for what she did with her emails! 🙄
17
This is about them having their 5-10 minutes of "try to smear time."
4
So here's a prime example of the left doing what they do best. The chairman even says the person asking the questions controls the time and can move forward if the they deem the question was answered. This OBVIOUSLY wasn't occurring.
3
@ervadaninhalastrar Do you know that this judge hasn't EVER made a ruling based on her "Religion" ??? All of her rulings have ALWAYS been ruled using the Constitution and Law...
3
2:24 It's a "her" ... Hence the dress and bow, Biden!
2
@ohisee9173 She doesn't have any history of that, and THAT'S why the is so disheartening.
2
@allenwoody8738 Exactly! She's always ruled directly with the law any constitution.
2
This hearing talked about how there weren't sufficient cameras in EPSTEIN's hallway. Now the media is saying that nobody came or went... How is that possible when they're weren't sufficient cameras noted in the beginning? Hmmmm.... A cover-up? Sounds like it!
1
Just because Wells Fargo have funding for a pipeline, doesn't mean that they are held liable if something went wrong. Wells Fargo wasn't the contractor or the company who built the pipeline. Come on AOC, nice reach on that one! 🙄
1
🤮
1
Oh look Nasty Nadler doesn't want Strzokt to answer... SURPRISE SURPRISE!!! 🙄 SHUT THE FUCK UP NADLESS! We are all sick and tired of your voice and bullshit! Oh wait, except the crooked DemonRats, they don't want anybody to wreck what THEY did to set up Trump!
1
@dandybeano3891 Nobody wants to listen to AOC bump her gums. She talks a lot, but a lot of what she says doesn't make a whole lot of sense... Like the green New Deal... Which got ZERO votes! That should tell you something about how they actually feel about her.
1
@ervadaninhalastrar Well... Let me just say that you weren't going to attack her character or whatever verbiage you used, but then you did just that, because she's personally "PRO-LIFE." And also a Catholic, the exact same thing, Joe Biden is. Next, you talk about how you think she might rule, because of a comment she stated (I'm curious where you saw this, as I would like to read it, please provide it). Just because somebody makes a statement about their personal values, doesn't mean they will rule AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION/LAW... She has ZERO track record of EVER doing that, and I think that's extremely important. "ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS." And lastly, in regards to Roe V Wade, I understand. Although I'm personally Pro-Life, I feel that in regards to rape/incest, that this should be available. I'm a victim/survivor of childhood sexual Assault and Rape, and unfortunately, also as an adult. Now, with all that being said, the one thing that's gone out the window with Abortion, is the whole "RARE" part. When there are over a million abortions a year, and they are now extending things to include late term abortions, this ISN'T okay. It's already legal if an abortion is needed because of potential death to the mother, or birth defects noticed later in pregnancy, but being able to terminate, right up until the very end, ISN'T okay. Yes, women need rights, but what about the baby? What about the voice of a child that can't speak or be heard? Should we just disregard that, because "MY BODY MY CHOICE!" ???? If abortion is going to stay legal (not including medical ones that are done and have been done for years), we should NOT be expanding the terms. A baby can already feel pain at at least 15 weeks. Also, do we just euthanize a baby, like we do a cat or dog? Where it's given a combination shot to sedate it, and then stop the heart?? NO! In most cases, we LITERALLY rip apart the baby, limb by limb... If people think a baby doesn't feel it when it's arms and /or legs are ripped off it's body, I've got news for you... It does. There's a reason Doctors use anesthesia when they do surgery on the baby inside the womb. Yes, "human rights," ARE important, but we need to think about ALL the "humans" involved, and NOT just the Mother... https://images.app.goo.gl/A9pCWjGtxrcaxnv98
1
@desertskys1 People always say "actions speak louder than words," and in this VERY situation, Amy Coney Barrett's actions speak louder than her words. Has she spoken about her beliefs? Yes, many people have, but she's never ruled on a case, because of her own personal beliefs. It's like people think that you can't have strong Religious beliefs, but then do your job legally... It happens with people EVERY SINGLE DAY!
1
@desertskys1 I'd rather have a Constitutionalist who's only been a judge for 10 years, than have a Judge, who doesn't follow the Constitution...
1
@ervadaninhalastrar Questions: What are your thoughts about usual birth abortion? Do you think there should be a cut-off? Do you think the Government should pay for them? Do you think people should be able to have an unlimited amount of abortions? Just curious your thoughts. I appreciate having a civil conversation with you. By the way.. Hope you're having a good day!
1
@ervadaninhalastrar I would like the source please, because I'd like to read it. Thank you. I also just find it strange that people are against guns, because they "kill people," but not against the killing of babies. I never thought I'd been a gun owner, but after going through a horrible DV situation, where I still have an active DVPO (nearly 6 years later, and the judge recently renewed it for 5 years instead of the usual 1), I'm not going to just rely on a piece of paper, to protect myself and my daughter. I also got my Concealed weapons permit, an 8 camera surveillance system and a separate home Monitoring system, to help protect myself and my daughter from my ex boyfriend/her father. I include that personal story, so you can understand where I'm coming from. Also, although I'm "ProLife," I understand the "need" for Abortions, like with with rape/incest: but that's only like 1% of them. I think laws should be stricter...How so? I don't think the government should be paying the bill... it's not right or okay, for people who are against them, to be fronting the bill for people who use it as a form of birth control (which does happen). I don't think we should be offering them past the first trimester (3 months), for multiple reasons, but the main one being that some Doctors have said that the baby can start feeling pain by week 15, because of the receptors. Some will say not until week 19, because of the neurons in the spinal cord, but when they've shown an aborted baby that's survived at 15-19 weeks (but passes away), and then poked it on the table, it moves. It definitely is feeling at that point, and without knowing for sure when pain is felt, we should proceed with caution. Having had two miscarriages, before my only child was born (a little girl), I know what it's like to grow a little human in your body, and the different phases the baby goes through. People talk about the Mother not having to suffer, but why can't we think about the baby as well? Is that too much to ask?
1