Comments by "Goose" (@goose7574) on "KJRH -TV | Tulsa | Channel 2" channel.

  1. You must NOT have listened to their police interrogations... The only reason they killed their family, was so they could "start out with a high number," for their killing spree. Their goal was to kill 50 people, in groups of 5 or more... This WASN'T the parents' fault. The fact the Father had an office (was providing for the entire family), and the older boys shared a room, ISN'T reason either... They were 16 & 18 (2 of SIX children), just so you know. Also, the 18 year old, only had his driver's permit, so he wasn't exactly trying to excel! The 16 year old, also hadn't ever driven a car, either. The fact there are people like you, who try to blame the victims, is truly disgusting. At least learn the case, and try to get all the facts.
    17
  2.  @stanfordwillis4841  Well... Most people don't believe that stuff, until they actually witness angry spirits... I didn't used to believe in that stuff, until I witnessed it. And now I've been legit terrified, ever since. I hope you don't EVER experience it.
    5
  3. Michelle Puerner That girl AND HER LITTLE SISTER (who was not an infant, but rather 2 years old), weren't still living in the house this happened in 2016, 2 years after the homicides). Their items were removed, when "they" went to live with another family. Not only that, but both girls, would've been entitled to both their parents social security, home funds (if their was any equity in the house), and life insurance, if there was any. If the home didn't have equity and there was no life insurance (very unlikely since the Father took care of the family financially, and usually when that's the case, at least, the providing parent will have life insurance, if not both, in case something were to ever happen), they still would've been entitled to their parents' social security.
    4